Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -95.2%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $428M | $530M | $600M | $1.1B | $180M | $374M | $461M | $568M | $968M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $676M | $777M | $425M | $934M | $-177692540 | $132M | $361M | $383M | $779M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.67 | 7.01 | 59.25 | 659.71 | 29.14 | 248.25 | 268.76 | 195.48 | 925.87 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.41 | 2.97 | 1.40 | 10.05 | 0.60 | 1.19 | 2.19 | 2.23 | 4.72 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.28 | 41.98 | 549.82 | -28.69 | 87.45 | 210.50 | 131.79 | 745.00 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -27.8% | -27.8% | -1293.5% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | -7765.2% | -3525.1% | -4520.4% | 40.4% | 60.6% |
| Operating Margin | -372.4% | -372.4% | -2385.6% | -10583.1% | -2307.0% | -9314.8% | -17675.4% | -8513.8% | -5503.7% | -1383.2% | -1186.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -381.4% | -381.4% | -2180.5% | -12272.3% | -2403.0% | -9429.1% | -8285.4% | -4258.9% | -2976.5% | -1165.2% | -1035.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -95.2% | -95.2% | -81.9% | -101.6% | -48.6% | -54.3% | -61.1% | -53.8% | -17.9% | -22.8% | -48.8% |
| ROA | -42.0% | -42.0% | -38.1% | -48.1% | -33.2% | -40.6% | -47.5% | -47.5% | -17.0% | -21.6% | -44.2% |
| ROIC | -62.3% | -62.3% | -204.1% | — | -1865.4% | -116.3% | -253.0% | -433.4% | -394.8% | -407.9% | -161.7% |
| ROCE | -45.5% | -45.5% | -45.9% | -46.4% | -34.8% | -44.0% | -112.4% | -102.4% | -33.0% | -26.8% | -55.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.97 | 1.97 | 0.12 | 0.48 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.39 | -0.41 | -1.67 | -1.20 | -0.77 | -0.48 | -0.73 | -0.92 | -0.96 | -0.91 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.66 | -7.66 | -25.91 | -3.62 | -15.68 | -127.54 | — | — | -4107.60 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.94 | 5.94 | 10.88 | 6.15 | 9.18 | 12.15 | 5.77 | 9.98 | 15.91 | 28.31 | 11.31 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.48 | 5.48 | 10.81 | 6.15 | 9.18 | 12.15 | 5.77 | 9.98 | 15.73 | 28.31 | 11.31 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.09 | 4.09 | 9.68 | 5.35 | 8.25 | 10.87 | 4.58 | 8.46 | 15.12 | 27.23 | 10.26 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.91 | 2.91 | 34.08 | — | — | — | — | — | 21.87 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 363.53 | 1739.88 | 225.06 | 1707.50 | 16.47 | 6317.80 | 3831.24 | 3234.69 | 1019.97 | 656.22 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $266M | $255M | $174M | $95M | $72M | $52M | $43M | $32M | $14M | $14M |
Clinical and commercial execution
Based on reported figures, Autolus trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 5.67, a multiple that appears to reflect high market expectations for the commercial success of obe-cel rather than current fundamental performance, which remains characterized by significant net losses and a lack of recurring product revenue.
The current valuation multiple suggests that investors are pricing in a high probability of regulatory approval and successful market penetration in the adult ALL segment. However, given the absence of commercial-stage earnings, this valuation remains highly sensitive to clinical trial outcomes and the potential for further equity dilution to fund ongoing operations.
As reported in financial statements, Autolus's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -18.5% in 2026Q1, which underscores the company's current inability to generate productive returns on its substantial capital investments in the Stevenage manufacturing facility while still in the pre-commercial clinical development stage.
The persistent negative ROIC is a structural feature of the company's current business model, where heavy R&D and infrastructure spending precede any meaningful revenue generation. Investors should monitor whether the company can achieve a positive inflection in capital returns once commercial manufacturing scales and the cost of clinical trials begins to moderate.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash conversion cycle remains highly erratic, reaching 289 days in 2026Q1, which suggests that the firm's operational efficiency is currently hampered by the lumpy nature of milestone-based receivables and the complexities of managing specialized cell-therapy supply chains.
The extreme fluctuations in the cash conversion cycle, including periods of massive spikes in days sales outstanding, indicate that Autolus lacks the predictable working capital management typical of mature industrial firms. This volatility warrants further investigation into the company's ability to manage its supplier and partner relationships as it transitions toward a commercial model.
Based on reported figures, the company's debt-to-equity ratio has shown significant volatility, peaking at 1.97 in 2025Q4 before retreating to 0.73 in 2026Q1, which indicates a reliance on non-traditional financing arrangements that may introduce future royalty obligations or restrictive covenants that are not immediately apparent.
The rapid shifts in leverage suggest that management is actively utilizing complex capital structures to bridge the funding gap between clinical development and commercialization. Investors should be cautious, as these financing arrangements may prioritize short-term liquidity at the expense of long-term equity value and operational flexibility.
As indicated by the company's financial profile, the price-to-sales ratio is a frequently misapplied metric for Autolus, as it obscures the fact that current revenue is derived from non-recurring milestone payments rather than sustainable product sales, potentially misleading investors regarding the company's true commercial trajectory.
Using standard revenue multiples for a pre-commercial biotech firm like Autolus ignores the lumpy, non-operational nature of its current income streams. A more appropriate analytical approach would involve evaluating the company based on its cash runway and the net present value of its clinical pipeline, rather than relying on traditional valuation multiples that assume a stable, recurring revenue base.
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AUTL stock.
Autolus Therapeutics plc's current P/E ratio is -1.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Autolus Therapeutics plc's return on equity (ROE) is -95.2%. The historical average is -56.6%.
Based on historical data, Autolus Therapeutics plc is trading at a P/E of -1.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Autolus Therapeutics plc has -27.8% gross margin and -372.4% operating margin.