Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -9.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -18.4%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15M | $20M | $17M | $10M | $12M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $14M | $19M | $16M | $9M | $11M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -9.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.76 | 2.41 | 1.79 | 0.87 | 0.82 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -18.4% | -18.4% | -29.9% | -30.6% | -12.3% | -12.9% | -84.1% |
| ROA | -18.0% | -18.0% | -28.6% | -29.8% | -12.2% | -12.7% | -83.2% |
| ROIC | -16.0% | -16.0% | -26.5% | -13.7% | -16.5% | -16.0% | — |
| ROCE | -20.2% | -20.2% | -33.1% | -17.1% | -19.8% | -9.3% | -78.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.07 | -0.04 | -0.08 | -0.04 | -0.43 | -0.66 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | -6.98 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($572691) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 25.02 | 25.02 | 23.67 | 14.36 | 127.69 | 18.22 | 63.93 |
| Quick Ratio | 25.02 | 25.02 | 23.67 | 14.36 | 127.69 | 18.22 | 63.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 24.39 | 24.39 | 23.16 | 14.08 | 125.53 | 18.01 | 63.83 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $13M | $13M | $13M | $13M | $13M | $13M |
Imminent liquidity and dilution
According to recent market data, Austin Gold trades at a P/B ratio of 1.84, which appears disconnected from the firm's lack of revenue and persistent negative earnings, suggesting that investors are pricing the stock based on speculative geological potential rather than any tangible underlying financial performance metrics.
The absence of positive P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples renders traditional valuation models ineffective for this entity. Investors should monitor the P/B ratio closely, as any further erosion of the equity base through continued losses could lead to a rapid re-rating of the stock's market capitalization.
Based on reported figures, Austin Gold's ROIC has consistently remained in negative territory, reaching -5.9% in 2026Q1, which underscores the firm's inability to generate returns on invested capital while it remains in a pre-revenue phase focused entirely on high-risk, discretionary mineral exploration activities.
The negative ROIC trend is a direct consequence of the company's business model, where capital is deployed into exploration assets that have yet to demonstrate economic viability. This persistent decay in returns on capital warrants further investigation into whether management can optimize drilling efficiency to preserve remaining shareholder value.
As reported in financial statements, the company's current ratio has fluctuated significantly, dropping to 15.29 in 2026Q1 from a peak of 84.80 in 2024Q2, which indicates a rapidly tightening liquidity position that may soon limit the firm's ability to fund essential property maintenance and exploration programs.
While the current ratio remains numerically high, it is misleading due to the company's lack of revenue and reliance on cash reserves to cover fixed administrative costs. Investors should interpret this decline as a signal that the company is approaching a point where external financing will be required to avoid operational paralysis.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Austin Gold is the current ratio, which, as indicated by historical filings, obscures the firm's true liquidity risk by failing to account for the high, non-discretionary burn rate required to maintain its Nevada land claims and administrative overhead.
Analysts should instead focus on the 'burn rate' relative to cash on hand, as the current ratio provides a false sense of security in a pre-revenue context. Relying on standard liquidity ratios in this business model may lead to an underestimation of the imminent risk of dilutive equity financing.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AUST stock.
Austin Gold Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -9.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -18.4%. The historical average is -31.4%.
Based on historical data, Austin Gold Corp. is trading at a P/E of -9.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.