Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -178.1%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $20M | $11M | $61M | $58M | $14M | $299M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $15M | $7M | $53M | $48M | $19M | $294M | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 9.57 | 5.58 | 69.28 | 305.94 | 26.91 | 487.73 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.82 | 1.32 | 5.33 | 4.41 | 50.05 | 27.46 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.32 | 60.00 | 253.64 | 35.64 | 479.54 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 69.1% | 73.8% | 67.2% | 74.4% | 74.5% |
| Operating Margin | -889.6% | -889.6% | -1656.5% | -5648.3% | -4222.6% | -2784.9% | -420.9% | -395.2% | -243.5% | -521.2% | -703.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -878.8% | -878.8% | -1610.6% | -10195.2% | -4594.1% | -2879.4% | -527.8% | -411.4% | -261.9% | -758.8% | -510.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -178.1% | -178.1% | -115.6% | -287.8% | -433.5% | -228.3% | -175.8% | -91.8% | -72.8% | -135.1% | — |
| ROA | -146.7% | -146.7% | -95.6% | -156.5% | -208.8% | -127.5% | -82.4% | -66.3% | -57.0% | -118.2% | -123.0% |
| ROIC | -373.0% | -373.0% | -337.3% | -198.2% | -310.5% | -194.9% | -76.3% | -68.7% | -61.8% | -652.3% | — |
| ROCE | -180.3% | -180.3% | -116.3% | -98.3% | -234.2% | -156.6% | -82.7% | -73.7% | -58.3% | -140.1% | -791.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.02 | 0.02 | 27.66 | 0.07 | 1.41 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.19 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.53 | -0.71 | -0.75 | 16.24 | -0.46 | 0.59 | 0.26 | -0.21 | -0.15 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1156.41 | -1156.41 | -290.80 | -16.70 | -15.57 | -27.70 | -10.62 | -26.79 | -12.19 | -12.05 | -1.72 |
Net cash position: cash ($5M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.16 | 4.16 | 3.41 | 6.55 | 3.48 | 2.36 | 1.49 | 0.63 | 3.57 | 3.35 | 0.11 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.16 | 4.16 | 3.41 | 6.55 | 3.48 | 2.31 | 1.41 | 0.56 | 3.49 | 3.04 | 0.10 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.39 | 3.39 | 2.87 | 6.11 | 2.59 | 1.97 | 1.30 | 0.24 | 3.12 | 2.80 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.60 | 3.86 | 9.41 | 1.20 | 3.27 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 42.71 | 216.06 | 175.08 | 181.19 | 15.97 | 12.44 | 18.00 | 12.48 | 26.29 | 26.17 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $13M | $10M | $6M | $3M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $1M | $906544 |
Imminent liquidity shortfall risk
As reported in recent financial filings, authID trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 8.70, a valuation that appears to price in aggressive future growth expectations rather than the company's current reality of persistent net losses and a highly uncertain path toward achieving sustainable profitability.
The current P/S ratio suggests that investors are valuing the firm as a high-growth venture rather than a mature software entity. This valuation warrants caution, as the lack of positive earnings or free cash flow makes traditional P/E or EV/EBITDA metrics inapplicable, leaving the stock highly sensitive to any deceleration in revenue growth.
Based on historical financial data, authID's ROIC has remained deeply negative, frequently hovering around -80% to -90%, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its ongoing investments in biometric technology and enterprise sales infrastructure.
The consistent failure to generate a positive return on invested capital suggests that the company's current business model is not yet optimized for efficiency. Investors should monitor whether future capital allocation can shift these returns toward breakeven, as the current trend indicates a structural inability to convert R&D spending into profitable growth.
According to quarterly reports, the company's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at approximately 0.06, reflecting a significant disconnect between the firm's asset base and its ability to generate meaningful revenue from its proprietary biometric identity verification platform.
The erratic nature of the company's DSO and working capital cycles suggests that revenue recognition is highly dependent on lumpy, non-recurring enterprise contracts. This inefficiency in converting assets into revenue highlights the operational challenges inherent in scaling a niche security solution within a competitive identity management landscape.
As indicated by the most recent balance sheet data, the company's current ratio has declined significantly from its historical peaks, leaving the firm with a tightening liquidity buffer that appears insufficient to support its ongoing cash-burn velocity without immediate external financing or capital market intervention.
The rapid depletion of cash reserves relative to operating expenses suggests that the company is in a precarious liquidity position. This vulnerability implies that the firm may be forced to pursue dilutive equity offerings, which would further impact the value of existing shares and increase the cost of capital.
Based on reported figures, the 100% gross margin metric is frequently misapplied by market participants, as it likely obscures the true variable costs of cloud hosting and third-party verification services that are currently being misclassified within operating expenses rather than cost of goods sold.
Analysts should adjust these margins to reflect a more accurate cost of service delivery, as the current reporting likely inflates the perceived profitability of the IDaaS model. Relying on the headline gross margin without this adjustment risks underestimating the true operational costs required to sustain the company's biometric platform.
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AUID stock.
authID Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
authID Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -178.1%. The historical average is -185.1%.
Based on historical data, authID Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
authID Inc. has 100.0% gross margin and -889.6% operating margin.