Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (1993–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $200M | $228M | $67M | $117M | $43M | $132M | $49M | $25M | $959867 | $6M | $432863 |
| Enterprise Value | $479M | $507M | $184M | $224M | $76M | $160M | $52M | $22M | $-7197133 | $1M | $-4475137 |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 40.72 | 46.41 | 12.93 | 25.81 | 7.72 | 29.52 | 59.53 | — | — | 56.10 | 1.66 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | 1.18 | 5.20 | 2.60 | 1.74 | 0.11 | 0.83 | 0.04 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 103.37 | 35.59 | 49.40 | 13.89 | 35.72 | 63.79 | — | — | 11.47 | -17.21 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 68.8% | -565.4% | 78.5% | -535.7% | -347.4% | -1655.0% | — | — | -225.2% | -41.9% |
| Operating Margin | -636.7% | -636.7% | -820.2% | -902.8% | -670.8% | -532.5% | -2623.0% | — | — | -14048.7% | -8991.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -3544.0% | -3544.0% | -365.6% | -1524.5% | -670.2% | -517.5% | -2695.1% | — | — | -11163.5% | -7245.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | -3439.4% | -120.1% | -104.6% | -132.6% | -168.9% | -149.5% | -147.1% | -167.9% |
| ROA | -212.8% | -212.8% | -20.5% | -67.0% | -41.6% | -42.4% | -68.3% | -104.3% | -105.2% | -87.5% | -75.8% |
| ROIC | -36.0% | -36.0% | -44.2% | -42.4% | -45.0% | -47.4% | -95.9% | -243.9% | -644.2% | -326.9% | -429.8% |
| ROCE | -58.8% | -58.8% | -70.7% | -49.6% | -49.9% | -48.7% | -80.9% | -127.7% | -135.5% | -135.9% | -106.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | 1.35 | 1.50 | 0.70 | 0.20 | — | — | 0.08 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | 0.94 | 1.09 | 0.19 | -0.22 | -0.96 | -0.66 | -0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1.88 | -1.88 | -3.95 | -25.29 | -1274.00 | -360.80 | -34.32 | -19.92 | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.23 | 1.16 | 1.09 | 3.11 | 1.62 | 1.36 | 3.27 | 2.74 | 1.78 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.23 | 1.16 | 1.09 | 3.11 | 1.62 | 1.36 | 3.27 | 2.74 | 1.95 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.19 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 2.14 | 1.44 | 1.24 | 3.17 | 2.61 | 1.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.02 | — | — | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 35.13 | 52.49 | 271.03 | 128.29 | 243.85 | 248.80 | — | — | — | 35.10 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.5% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 18.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $36M | $36M | $36M | $34M | $24M | $16M | $8M | $332341 | $456244 | $7027 |
Imminent liquidity and dilution
Based on reported figures, Armata’s P/S ratio of 53.87 suggests that the market is pricing the firm as a speculative call option on its phage platform rather than on current revenue, which remains highly volatile and dependent on non-recurring milestone payments from strategic partners.
The extreme P/S multiple reflects a significant disconnect between current financial performance and investor expectations for the company's proprietary technology. Investors should monitor whether this valuation can be sustained as the company approaches critical clinical milestones, as the lack of a meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA ratio underscores the absence of a commercialized product foundation.
As reported in financial statements, Armata’s gross margin of 68.78% appears structurally high due to the nature of collaboration revenue, yet this is entirely offset by an operating margin of -636.66%, indicating that the firm's core earning power remains deeply negative at this stage.
The divergence between gross and operating margins highlights the heavy fixed-cost burden required to maintain specialized GMP manufacturing facilities. This suggests that the company is currently in a phase where operational scale is insufficient to absorb the high R&D overhead, rendering traditional profitability metrics largely irrelevant until a commercial inflection point is reached.
According to recent SEC filings, Armata’s asset turnover remains negligible at 0.01, reflecting a business model that has yet to generate meaningful commercial volume, while the erratic nature of its cash conversion cycle suggests significant reliance on the timing of milestone-based inflows.
The low asset turnover is typical for a clinical-stage biotech, but it underscores the inefficiency of holding specialized manufacturing assets that are not yet producing revenue-generating products. The variability in DSO and DPO metrics further suggests that working capital management is secondary to the primary objective of extending the cash runway through clinical development.
Based on the provided quarterly data, Armata’s current ratio of 0.64 in 2026Q1 indicates a precarious liquidity position, where current assets are insufficient to cover short-term obligations, leaving the company highly vulnerable to any delays in milestone payments or external capital market volatility.
The rapid decline in the current ratio over the last ten quarters suggests that the company is consuming its liquid reserves at an unsustainable pace. This warrants further investigation into the company's ability to secure additional financing, as the current liquidity profile appears inadequate to support the ongoing high-burn clinical trial schedule.
The P/S ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for Armata, as it obscures the fact that current revenue is milestone-driven and non-recurring, failing to account for the underlying clinical progress or the potential value of the company's proprietary phage library.
Investors should instead focus on the 'Cash Runway-to-Milestone Ratio' or the 'Clinical Enrollment Velocity,' as these metrics provide a more accurate assessment of the company's survival and potential for future value creation. Relying on revenue multiples in a pre-commercial biotech context may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the firm's true risk-adjusted value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ARMP stock.
Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has 68.8% gross margin and -636.7% operating margin.