Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 3.9x · EV/EBITDA 3.9x · ROE 10.1%. (2009–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $164M | $185M | $238M | $231M | $337M | $118M | $49M | $194M | $158M | $346M | $431M |
| Enterprise Value | $107M | $128M | $370M | $332M | $535M | $332M | $302M | $483M | $170M | $405M | $482M |
| P/E Ratio → | 3.86 | 4.44 | 19.35 | 0.62 | 6.10 | — | — | — | 3.18 | — | 3.68 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 1.54 | 0.54 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.58 | 0.59 | — | — | — | 0.45 | 0.29 | 0.71 | 0.77 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 2.10 | 11.36 | 3.56 | 1.28 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 3.34 | 3.75 | 4.64 | 1.63 | 5.23 | 1.87 | 0.66 | 4.10 | 1.47 | 2.89 | 5.03 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.48 | 1.26 | 1.08 | 1.17 | 0.97 | 1.49 | 1.75 | 0.83 | 1.80 | 0.61 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.91 | 4.65 | 5.88 | 2.96 | 5.58 | 135.03 | — | 11.01 | 1.45 | — | 1.43 |
| EV / EBIT | — | 1.67 | 12.36 | 2.06 | 7.42 | — | — | — | 3.13 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 3.01 | 18.04 | 10.02 | 7.86 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.2% | 27.2% | 93.7% | 38.8% | 59.7% | 50.3% | 10.2% | 28.1% | 43.2% | 36.2% | 78.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | -1.9% | 10.3% | 24.8% | 15.7% | -7.5% | -218.6% | -4.3% | 26.5% | -35.3% | 32.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 16.7% | 16.7% | 4.4% | 127.7% | 12.6% | -9.4% | -229.6% | -12.8% | 24.3% | -37.8% | 14.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.1% | 10.1% | 3.2% | 203.2% | — | — | -231.7% | -7.2% | 9.7% | -16.2% | 20.8% |
| ROA | 6.5% | 6.5% | 1.7% | 65.6% | 12.7% | -7.6% | -73.5% | -4.7% | 7.7% | -11.7% | 16.2% |
| ROIC | -0.8% | -0.8% | 4.4% | 16.7% | 31.5% | -10.4% | -70.3% | -1.4% | 7.4% | -10.3% | 35.3% |
| ROCE | -0.8% | -0.8% | 4.6% | 15.9% | 23.6% | -8.3% | -77.2% | -1.7% | 9.0% | -11.9% | 37.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.31 | — | — | — | 0.67 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.23 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.14 | 0.14 | 2.10 | 1.09 | 2.06 | 94.67 | — | 6.60 | 0.20 | — | 0.38 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.12 | 0.32 | 0.26 | — | — | — | 0.67 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.07 | -2.07 | 2.10 | 0.90 | 2.06 | 87.03 | — | 6.60 | 0.10 | — | 0.15 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | 0.92 | 6.67 | 6.46 | 6.57 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 4.91 | 4.91 | 2.05 | 9.11 | 5.11 | -1.65 | -21.61 | -1.09 | 12.06 | -14.21 | -3.00 |
Net cash position: cash ($61M) exceeds total debt ($4M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 1.44 | 1.85 | 2.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 1.22 | 1.83 | 2.20 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | — | 0.22 | — | 0.11 | 0.18 | — | 0.35 | 1.18 | 1.37 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.53 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 1.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.78 | 188.49 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 41.77 | 49.19 | 46.39 | 64.05 | 97.89 | 55.80 | 43.90 | 46.30 | 58.24 | 20.10 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.7% | 8.2% | — | — | 3.1% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 25.9% | 22.5% | 5.2% | 162.4% | 16.4% | — | — | — | 31.4% | — | 27.2% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 47.7% | 8.8% | 28.1% | 78.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 15.3% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 7.8% | 23.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 3.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $40M | $40M | $39M | $38M | $38M | $38M | $29M | $25M | $25M | $25M |
Regulatory and decommissioning liabilities
According to current market data, AMPY trades at a trailing P/E of 3.83 and an EV/EBITDA of 3.85, suggesting that investors are applying a significant regulatory discount to the company's valuation compared to broader energy sector peers that lack similar offshore operational risks.
The low valuation multiples appear to reflect market skepticism regarding the long-term viability of the Beta Field rather than a fundamental mispricing of cash flows. Investors should monitor whether the forward EV/EBITDA of 2.03 indicates an expectation of earnings recovery or merely a reflection of the market's lack of confidence in sustained production levels.
Based on reported financial statements, AMPY's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive territory, oscillating between -3.7% and 8.7% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the company is failing to consistently compound capital due to the high costs of maintaining aging offshore infrastructure.
The erratic ROIC trends suggest that the company's capital allocation is primarily defensive, focused on sustaining existing production rather than generating incremental returns. This performance warrants further investigation into whether the current asset base can ever achieve a sustainable return on capital above the cost of equity given the heavy regulatory burden.
As reported in recent filings, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant at approximately 0.06 to 0.11, highlighting a structural inability to generate meaningful revenue growth from its existing asset base despite the recent return to full operational status at the Beta Field.
The lack of improvement in asset turnover suggests that the company's production profile is in a state of terminal decline that is not being offset by operational efficiencies. Investors should note that the high DSO and volatile DPO figures indicate potential friction in the company's supply chain and customer payment cycles.
Based on the most recent quarterly data, the current ratio of 1.16 indicates a narrow liquidity buffer, which may leave the company vulnerable to sudden operational disruptions or unexpected increases in regulatory compliance costs, as seen in the company's historical exposure to offshore safety-related shut-ins.
While the company maintains a clean balance sheet with minimal debt, the tight liquidity position suggests that any significant, unforeseen capital expenditure could quickly strain cash reserves. This liquidity profile appears inadequate for an operator managing high-risk, mature offshore assets that require constant, non-discretionary maintenance spending.
The commonly cited debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01% is a misleading metric for this business model, as it obscures the massive, off-balance-sheet decommissioning liabilities associated with the company's offshore platforms, which represent a significant long-term financial obligation not captured by traditional leverage ratios.
Investors should instead focus on the ratio of total liabilities to cash flow, which would provide a more accurate picture of the company's true financial burden. Relying on the debt-to-equity ratio alone may lead to an overestimation of the company's financial health and an underestimation of the capital required for future asset retirement.
Includes 30+ ratios · 17 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AMPY stock.
Amplify Energy Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 3.9x. The historical average is 5.5x. This places it at the 57th percentile of its historical range.
Amplify Energy Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 3.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 4.8x.
Amplify Energy Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 10.1%. The historical average is -6.1%.
Based on historical data, Amplify Energy Corp. is trading at a P/E of 3.9x. This is at the 57th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Amplify Energy Corp. has 27.2% gross margin and -1.9% operating margin.
Amplify Energy Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.