Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 8.3x · EV/EBITDA 9.5x · ROE 13.3%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.0B | $4.5B | $4.9B | $4.7B | $4.0B | $3.5B | $2.8B | $2.2B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $10.3B | $10.8B | $10.1B | $10.2B | $7.5B | $7.9B | $5.2B | $4.0B | $3.3B | $3.0B | $3.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 8.31 | 9.25 | 11.30 | 7.84 | 4.03 | 6.52 | 11.06 | 11.71 | 8.05 | 9.67 | 8.34 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.05 | 1.17 | 1.39 | 1.46 | 1.38 | 1.64 | 3.11 | 3.34 | 2.86 | 3.41 | 4.99 |
| P/FCF | 6.99 | 7.86 | 13.39 | 27.68 | 6.83 | 3.21 | 4.66 | 7.62 | — | 6.16 | 27.61 |
| P/OCF | 5.15 | 5.80 | 7.24 | 15.09 | 5.77 | 2.98 | 4.31 | 6.17 | 133.98 | 5.05 | 9.79 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.51 | 9.98 | 11.06 | 9.95 | 5.57 | 9.42 | 12.65 | 11.17 | 9.59 | 9.49 | 9.68 |
| EV / EBIT | 10.29 | 11.50 | 11.93 | 10.50 | 5.05 | 9.82 | 12.55 | 11.98 | 10.63 | 10.54 | 9.26 |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.76 | 27.74 | 59.51 | 12.70 | 7.26 | 8.57 | 14.26 | — | 13.90 | 62.98 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 16.6% | 16.6% | 17.2% | 18.6% | 20.1% | 19.3% | 17.2% | 16.2% | 16.0% | 16.4% | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 5.6% | 4.9% | 6.4% | 8.2% | 8.0% | 5.2% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 4.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 4.1% | 6.5% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.3% | 13.3% | 12.8% | 19.6% | 39.7% | 35.2% | 32.8% | 32.9% | 38.7% | 41.3% | 56.3% |
| ROA | 4.5% | 4.5% | 4.2% | 6.6% | 12.4% | 9.1% | 7.7% | 6.6% | 6.7% | 5.9% | 7.2% |
| ROIC | 8.0% | 8.0% | 7.2% | 9.5% | 14.8% | 12.2% | 9.6% | 9.9% | 10.3% | 10.4% | 10.8% |
| ROCE | 12.8% | 12.8% | 11.3% | 13.4% | 19.0% | 17.9% | 18.0% | 21.3% | 23.1% | 22.7% | 23.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.51 | 1.69 | 1.27 | 2.16 | 2.61 | 2.91 | 4.14 | 4.30 | 6.40 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.83 | 5.83 | 5.80 | 5.37 | 2.75 | 5.47 | 5.78 | 5.21 | 5.68 | 5.30 | 5.45 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.61 | 1.49 | 1.67 | 1.19 | 2.07 | 2.61 | 2.90 | 4.12 | 4.29 | 6.39 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.80 | 5.80 | 5.72 | 5.32 | 2.57 | 5.26 | 5.78 | 5.20 | 5.66 | 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 10.90 | 14.35 | 31.83 | 5.87 | 4.05 | 3.92 | 6.63 | — | 7.74 | 35.37 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.38 | 3.38 | 3.14 | 5.84 | 9.21 | 7.83 | 5.54 | 3.63 | 3.61 | 3.66 | 4.55 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.11 | 1.06 | 1.85 | 1.21 | 1.15 | 1.29 | 1.19 | 1.23 | 1.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.40 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.53 | 1.66 | 1.46 | 1.92 | 1.23 | 1.94 | 2.48 | 2.55 | 2.74 | 2.79 |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.03 | 7.03 | 7.20 | 6.81 | 12.86 | 11.05 | 6.75 | 6.13 | 5.41 | 6.54 | 6.11 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 12.42 | 12.93 | 13.92 | 10.55 | 17.42 | 17.27 | 17.62 | 17.45 | 18.19 | 17.95 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 12.0% | 10.8% | 8.8% | 12.8% | 24.8% | 15.3% | 9.0% | 8.5% | 12.4% | 10.3% | 12.0% |
| FCF Yield | 14.3% | 12.7% | 7.5% | 3.6% | 14.6% | 31.2% | 21.5% | 13.1% | — | 16.2% | 3.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.8% | 2.5% | 4.0% | 5.9% | 7.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 15.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.8% | 2.5% | 4.0% | 5.9% | 7.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 15.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $20M | $20M | $21M | $22M | $20M | $19M | $19M | $20M | $21M | $23M |
Inventory financing cost sensitivity
According to current market data, ABG trades at a forward P/E of 7.92, which suggests that investors are pricing in significant earnings contraction rather than growth, a valuation discount that appears consistent with the broader auto retail sector's struggle to maintain pandemic-era profitability levels.
The low P/E multiple relative to historical averages indicates that the market remains skeptical of the company's ability to sustain margins as vehicle pricing normalizes. This valuation suggests that investors are prioritizing immediate cash flow yields over the long-term potential of the Clicklane digital platform.
Based on reported financial figures, ABG's ROIC has trended downward to 4.8% in 2026Q1, a decline that highlights the difficulty of integrating large-scale acquisitions like Larry H. Miller while simultaneously managing the rising cost of capital in a high-interest rate environment.
The compression in returns on invested capital suggests that recent capital deployment has not yet generated sufficient incremental earnings to offset the dilution of the asset base. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's aggressive M&A strategy is creating long-term shareholder value or merely expanding the revenue footprint at the expense of efficiency.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's days inventory outstanding (DIO) has fluctuated around 50 days, a metric that indicates potential challenges in balancing inventory levels with cooling consumer demand across the Sunbelt dealership network during the most recent reporting periods.
The variability in the cash conversion cycle suggests that ABG is struggling to optimize its working capital as the market shifts from a supply-constrained environment to one defined by inventory accumulation. Investors should monitor whether rising inventory levels lead to increased floorplan interest expenses and subsequent margin erosion.
Based on the provided quarterly data, ABG maintains a current ratio of 0.94 as of 2026Q1, a level that appears tight for a capital-intensive dealership model and suggests limited room for error should the company face a sudden, severe downturn in vehicle sales volume.
The reliance on short-term financing to manage inventory leaves the company vulnerable to interest rate volatility and credit market tightening. This liquidity profile implies that the firm may be forced to prioritize debt service over strategic investments if cash flow generation remains as erratic as observed in recent quarters.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to ABG because it fails to account for the massive non-operating interest expenses associated with floorplan financing, which can artificially depress net income and distort the company's true operational earning power compared to less capital-intensive retail peers.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or F&I gross profit per retail unit to better capture the underlying profitability of the service and finance segments. Relying solely on P/E ignores the structural reality that dealership earnings are highly sensitive to accounting noise and cyclical inventory financing costs.
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ABG stock.
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 8.3x. The historical average is 12.3x. This places it at the 22th percentile of its historical range.
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.2x.
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 13.3%. The historical average is 18.5%.
Based on historical data, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 8.3x. This is at the 22th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has 16.6% gross margin and 5.6% operating margin.
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.