Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 36.8x · EV/EBITDA 3.2x · ROE 6.0%. (1998–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $115M | $1.2B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.3B | $3.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 36.76 | 34.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.02 | 0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.23 | 2.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 0.56 | 5.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.25 | 2.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.23 | 4.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 9.53 | 13.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 16.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.1% | 12.1% | 10.3% | 12.1% | 14.0% | 12.4% | 13.8% | 15.7% | 17.9% | 18.4% | 16.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 3.9% | 2.4% | 4.2% | 4.7% | -8.4% | 6.5% | 1.5% | 8.7% | 9.6% | 9.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.6% | 0.6% | -0.6% | 1.1% | 0.1% | -11.9% | -7.4% | -0.8% | 5.4% | 6.1% | 6.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.0% | 6.0% | -5.5% | 11.9% | 1.4% | -82.9% | -39.3% | -3.8% | 32.5% | 57.9% | 113.6% |
| ROA | 0.7% | 0.7% | -0.6% | 1.2% | 0.1% | -8.9% | -6.8% | -0.7% | 6.0% | 7.2% | 7.3% |
| ROIC | 5.3% | 5.3% | 3.0% | 4.9% | 4.7% | -6.8% | 6.4% | 1.5% | 10.9% | 15.8% | 16.1% |
| ROCE | 6.0% | 6.0% | 3.5% | 5.5% | 5.0% | -7.5% | 7.2% | 1.7% | 11.5% | 14.4% | 14.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.86 | 4.86 | 4.93 | 4.98 | 7.23 | 9.57 | 3.84 | 2.56 | 2.57 | 2.65 | 4.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.85 | 3.85 | 4.71 | 4.24 | 4.22 | 28.37 | 3.91 | 6.65 | 4.32 | 2.57 | 2.48 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.88 | 4.07 | 4.16 | 6.08 | 8.08 | 3.30 | 2.24 | 2.33 | 1.74 | 3.64 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.89 | 3.55 | 3.54 | 23.95 | 3.36 | 5.82 | 3.91 | 1.69 | 1.97 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 10.69 | 12.23 | 9.41 | 7.79 | 12.62 | 25.61 | 13.50 | 21.25 | 5.00 | 5.96 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.88 | 1.38 | 1.51 | -1.94 | -1.45 | 0.58 | 2.74 | 4.20 | 3.61 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.67 | 1.66 | 1.78 | 1.92 | 1.81 | 1.50 | 1.60 | 2.05 | 1.61 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.67 | 1.66 | 1.78 | 1.92 | 1.81 | 1.50 | 1.60 | 2.05 | 1.61 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.74 | 0.40 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.21 | 1.14 | 1.06 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.79 | 1.14 | 1.22 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.7% | 2.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 17.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $118M | $117M | $116M | $114M | $113M | $112M | $112M | $103M | $77M | $76M |
Extreme debt-to-equity leverage
According to recent market data, the company trades at a P/S ratio of 0.02 and an EV/EBITDA of 3.23, which, based on reported figures, suggests that investors are pricing in significant terminal value risk rather than near-term growth potential compared to broader industrial sector benchmarks.
The extremely low P/S multiple indicates that the market assigns minimal value to the company's top-line revenue, likely due to concerns regarding the long-term viability of its legacy product portfolio. This valuation profile appears consistent with a distressed asset where the market is skeptical of the company's ability to successfully transition its manufacturing base toward electric vehicle components.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has trended toward zero, with a 2025Q3 figure of -0.0%, suggesting that the firm is currently failing to generate returns that exceed its cost of capital, a trend that warrants further investigation into its asset efficiency.
The inability to maintain a positive ROIC suggests that the capital-intensive nature of the business is not being offset by sufficient operating margins. This decay in returns appears to be driven by both the high fixed-cost burden of its forging operations and the lack of pricing power in a highly competitive automotive supply market.
Based on reported figures, the company's debt-to-equity ratio reached 4.86 in 2024Q4, which, when compared to historical levels, indicates that the firm remains highly leveraged and exceptionally sensitive to interest rate volatility and potential credit market tightening in the current fiscal environment.
The high leverage ratio suggests that a significant portion of the company's cash flow is likely diverted toward interest payments, leaving little room for the R&D investment required for the EV transition. Investors should monitor the interest coverage ratio closely, as any further decline in operating income could jeopardize the company's ability to service its existing debt obligations.
According to the latest quarterly data, the current ratio has deteriorated to 0.60 as of 2025Q3, which, based on reported figures, suggests that the company may face significant challenges in meeting its short-term obligations without relying on external financing or further asset liquidations to maintain operations.
A current ratio below 1.0 is particularly concerning for a capital-intensive manufacturer that requires significant working capital to manage inventory and production cycles. This liquidity position appears to leave the company with virtually no margin for error in the event of a supply chain disruption or a sudden decline in OEM production volumes.
As evidenced by the company's financial records, the net margin of 0.57% is frequently misapplied by analysts as a proxy for operational health, when in reality, it is heavily distorted by non-recurring restructuring charges and pension accounting adjustments that obscure the underlying cash-generating capacity of the business.
Investors should instead focus on EBITDA or free cash flow metrics to better understand the company's core operational performance. Relying on net margin in this specific business model risks misinterpreting accounting noise as a fundamental trend, potentially leading to an incorrect assessment of the firm's true earning power.
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AAM stock.
AA Mission Acquisition Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 36.8x. The historical average is 34.8x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
AA Mission Acquisition Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 3.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 4.7x.
AA Mission Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 6.0%. The historical average is 35.1%.
Based on historical data, AA Mission Acquisition Corp. is trading at a P/E of 36.8x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AA Mission Acquisition Corp. has 12.1% gross margin and 3.9% operating margin.
AA Mission Acquisition Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.