Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -88.3%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $44M | $45M | $493M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $17M | $19M | $490M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 177.11 | 183.86 | 474.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.23 | 0.38 | 73.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 77.36 | 470.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -1159.5% | -1159.5% | -46.7% | -144.6% | — | — | -7.6% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -21510.5% | -21510.5% | -1012.1% | -1598.3% | — | — | -1195.3% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -22505.7% | -22505.7% | -1055.7% | -1538.6% | — | — | -1200.5% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -88.3% | -88.3% | -138.2% | -77.2% | -58.4% | -217.5% | -94.9% | -74.9% | -614.8% |
| ROA | -82.1% | -82.1% | -83.5% | -60.4% | -45.1% | -145.3% | -83.6% | -65.0% | -293.5% |
| ROIC | -83.0% | -83.0% | -225.7% | -298.9% | -339.2% | -1392.6% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -83.5% | -83.5% | -117.9% | -74.6% | -55.4% | -188.0% | -94.4% | -74.4% | -656.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.59 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.28 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.22 | -0.53 | -0.58 | -0.89 | -0.75 | -1.06 | -1.04 | -1.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -346.43 | -346.43 | -63.27 | -771.58 | -41.98 | -116.65 | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($27M) exceeds total debt ($724000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 9.85 | 9.85 | 2.05 | 3.16 | 7.85 | 3.12 | 5.09 | 13.28 | 1.75 |
| Quick Ratio | 9.85 | 9.85 | 1.61 | 2.28 | 7.25 | 2.66 | 5.09 | 13.28 | 1.75 |
| Cash Ratio | 9.22 | 9.22 | 1.45 | 2.05 | 7.04 | 2.57 | 4.50 | 12.99 | 1.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.06 | — | — | 0.09 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.10 | 0.10 | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | 161.58 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $5M | $10M | $6M | $5M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M |
Commercialization and liquidity risk
Based on reported figures, ZOOZ trades at a P/S ratio of 171.53, a valuation multiple that appears disconnected from the company's -76.27% revenue growth and suggests investors are pricing the firm as a speculative R&D venture rather than a functioning industrial equipment provider.
The extreme P/S multiple indicates that the market is assigning value to the company's patent portfolio and cash reserves rather than its current commercial output. Investors should monitor whether this premium can be sustained as the company continues to burn through its capital without demonstrating a clear path to revenue scale.
As reported in financial statements, ZOOZ's gross margin of -1159.51% highlights a business model where the cost of manufacturing specialized flywheel units significantly exceeds current market pricing, suggesting that the company is currently unable to achieve the economies of scale necessary for industrial viability.
The deeply negative operating margins suggest that the company's fixed cost base is far too large for its current revenue level. This implies that any future profitability is contingent on a massive, non-linear increase in production volume that has yet to materialize in the company's historical performance.
According to recent SEC filings, ZOOZ's ROIC has trended into deeply negative territory, reaching -26.4% in 2025Q4, which underscores the company's inability to generate a return on the capital invested in its kinetic energy storage technology and specialized manufacturing infrastructure.
The persistent decay in return on capital suggests that the company is consuming shareholder equity to fund ongoing R&D rather than compounding value. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's core technology can ever achieve the margins required to justify its historical capital expenditure.
Based on ZOOZ's reported figures, the company's inventory turnover and cash conversion cycle metrics have been highly volatile, with DIO reaching as high as 522 days in past periods, indicating significant challenges in managing the production and sale of its complex flywheel storage units.
The inability to maintain a consistent cash conversion cycle suggests that the company's operational processes are not yet optimized for commercial scale. Investors should monitor whether the company can shorten these cycles as it attempts to move beyond pilot-stage deployments.
The most commonly misapplied metric for ZOOZ is the P/S ratio, which obscures the fact that the company is currently in a pre-commercial phase where revenue is non-recurring and highly volatile, making traditional valuation multiples largely irrelevant for assessing the firm's true long-term potential.
Instead of relying on P/S or P/E multiples, analysts should focus on the 'cash runway' and the 'cost-per-cycle' of the flywheel technology relative to lithium-ion alternatives. Using standard industrial valuation metrics for a company with negligible revenue and negative gross margins may lead to a fundamental misunderstanding of the firm's risk profile.
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ZOOZ stock.
ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -0.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -88.3%. The historical average is -107.0%.
Based on historical data, ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -0.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. has -1159.5% gross margin and -21510.5% operating margin.