Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -177.2%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $291262 | $7M | $255M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-5621695 | $640437 | $249M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.19 | 4.19 | 101.83 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.01 | 0.22 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.41 | 99.67 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 10.8% | -12.5% | 18.3% | -33.6% | -114.9% |
| Operating Margin | -730.3% | -730.3% | -739.0% | -1390.0% | -306.5% | -622.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1631.0% | -1631.0% | -909.6% | -1405.3% | -306.5% | -622.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -177.2% | -177.2% | -322.7% | -189.0% | -65.7% | -55.1% |
| ROA | -133.7% | -133.7% | -206.6% | -177.7% | -58.5% | -53.5% |
| ROIC | -97.9% | -97.9% | -1669.5% | -243.4% | -61.7% | — |
| ROCE | -79.2% | -79.2% | -262.1% | -187.0% | -65.7% | -55.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.20 | — | -0.48 | -0.00 | -0.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | -91.09 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($6M) exceeds total debt ($62451)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 8.60 | 8.60 | 0.78 | 32.09 | 0.93 | 12.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 8.60 | 8.60 | 0.78 | 32.09 | 0.93 | 12.85 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.21 | 3.21 | 0.72 | 15.04 | 0.01 | 10.75 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.36 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.09 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 611.28 | 25.91 | 56.18 | 327.55 | 252.77 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $7M | $5M | $5M | $4M | $4M |
Unsustainable cash burn rate
According to recent market data, LQR House trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 4.79, a valuation that appears disconnected from the company's negative margins and contracting revenue base, suggesting investors are pricing in speculative optionality rather than current operational performance or fundamental earnings power.
The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio and the reliance on P/S multiples indicate that the market is struggling to find a valuation anchor for a business that has yet to demonstrate a path to profitability. Investors should monitor whether this premium valuation is supported by tangible asset growth or if it remains a byproduct of low liquidity and speculative interest in the digital spirits space.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has consistently trended in negative territory, reaching -9.2% in 2026Q1, which indicates that management is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its investments in digital infrastructure and premium brand development.
The persistent inability to generate a positive return on invested capital suggests that the firm's cost structure is fundamentally misaligned with its revenue-generating capacity. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's capital allocation strategy can be pivoted to prioritize high-margin activities over the current high-burn growth model.
Based on the company's reported figures, the Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) has shown extreme volatility, spiking to 531 days in 2026Q1, which suggests significant friction in the firm's ability to convert its e-commerce and wholesale transactions into actual cash inflows.
Such elevated DSO levels relative to historical norms imply that the company may be facing structural challenges in its collection process or that its revenue recognition practices are not translating into timely liquidity. This inefficiency exacerbates the firm's cash burn, as it must fund operations while waiting for extended payment cycles to resolve.
As evidenced by the provided balance sheet data, the current ratio has plummeted from 32.09 in 2023Q4 to 9.47 in 2026Q1, signaling that while the firm maintains a nominal liquidity cushion, its ability to cover short-term obligations is deteriorating rapidly as cash reserves are consumed.
The rapid decline in the current ratio reflects the ongoing depletion of cash to fund operating losses, leaving the company increasingly vulnerable to liquidity shocks. Investors should monitor the company's cash runway closely, as the current burn rate may necessitate further capital raises that could dilute existing shareholders.
The most commonly misapplied metric for LQR House is the Price-to-Sales ratio, which obscures the company's underlying lack of profitability and high fulfillment costs, leading to an overestimation of the firm's value as a growth-stage entity rather than a distressed retailer.
Analysts should instead focus on the ratio of Customer Acquisition Cost to Lifetime Value or Gross Margin per unit, as these metrics better reflect the sustainability of the business model. Relying on top-line revenue multiples ignores the reality that each additional dollar of sales currently appears to be generated at a net loss.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying YHC stock.
LQR House Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
LQR House Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -177.2%. The historical average is -161.9%.
Based on historical data, LQR House Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
LQR House Inc. has 10.8% gross margin and -730.3% operating margin.