Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -78.6%. (2016–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8M | $113M | $20M | — | $66M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $15M | $120M | $26M | — | $66M | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.69 | 9.70 | 1.16 | — | 2.04 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.16 | 2.26 | 0.14 | — | 0.79 | — | 166940.10 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.32 | 1.57 | — | 2.05 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.8% | 39.8% | 20.3% | 35.9% | 33.4% | 35.2% | 30.2% | 33.8% | 37.4% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | -718.3% | -718.3% | -318.4% | -191.7% | -25.3% | -12.3% | -56.0% | 4.4% | 17.8% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -656.6% | -656.6% | -651.4% | -205.2% | -29.1% | -68.5% | -53.7% | 6.7% | 18.4% | 16.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -78.6% | -78.6% | -88.9% | -23.2% | -12.0% | -46.4% | -174.7% | 26.5% | 127.6% | 337.4% |
| ROA | -58.1% | -58.1% | -71.5% | -17.5% | -8.5% | -26.7% | -36.9% | 6.2% | 22.9% | 26.4% |
| ROIC | -60.1% | -60.1% | -31.4% | -16.0% | -8.0% | -7.0% | -335.3% | 25.7% | 116.0% | — |
| ROCE | -85.1% | -85.1% | -43.4% | -21.7% | -10.4% | -8.4% | -182.2% | 17.4% | 123.6% | 365.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.04 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.20 | 0.06 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.00 | -0.05 | -0.73 | -0.47 | -0.52 | -4.20 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.83 | -0.65 | -1.11 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -3.94 | — | -1.11 |
| Interest Coverage | -126.91 | -126.91 | -149.94 | -98.82 | — | — | — | 47.22 | — | 205.49 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.98 | 3.13 | 1.21 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 1.04 | 1.06 | 0.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.98 | 3.13 | 1.21 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 1.04 | 1.06 | 0.85 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.36 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 0.99 | 1.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 224.43 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 613.93 | 518.87 | 2666.45 | 335.86 | 278.34 | 231.53 | 248.92 | 220.59 | 88.52 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $672860 | $76858 | $0 | $3079 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Liquidity and operational viability
Based on reported figures, XTKG trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.69, which suggests that the market assigns a significant discount to the company's diversified business model compared to traditional software peers, likely reflecting deep skepticism regarding the sustainability of its recent pivot into crypto and agriculture.
The negative P/E ratio and lack of meaningful EV/EBITDA metrics underscore the company's inability to generate consistent earnings, rendering traditional valuation multiples largely ineffective for assessing intrinsic value. Investors should monitor whether the current P/S multiple represents a value opportunity or a value trap, given the persistent revenue contraction and the absence of a clear path to profitability.
As reported in financial statements, XTKG's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -25.3% in 2025Q2, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder capital rather than compounding it through its various operational initiatives in trade software, cryptocurrency mining, and agricultural technology.
The persistent decay in return on invested capital suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy has failed to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the recent pivot to capital-intensive sectors is merely masking the structural decline of the legacy software business.
According to recent SEC filings, XTKG's asset turnover ratio has stagnated at 0.04 in 2025Q2, a figure that highlights the company's inability to efficiently utilize its asset base to generate revenue compared to historical levels and broader industry standards for software-centric business models.
The extremely high DSO and DPO figures suggest significant friction in the company's cash conversion cycle, indicating that XTKG may be struggling to collect receivables from its trade-zone clients while simultaneously managing supplier obligations. This inefficiency appears to be a structural drag on liquidity, further complicating the firm's ability to fund its ongoing operational burn.
Based on the latest quarterly data, XTKG's current ratio has compressed to 0.95, indicating that the company's short-term assets are no longer sufficient to cover its immediate liabilities, a precarious position that leaves the firm highly vulnerable to any further deterioration in operational cash flow.
The reliance on a thin liquidity buffer suggests that the company may face imminent financing risks if it cannot rapidly improve its cash position. Investors should monitor the company's ability to maintain operations without resorting to dilutive equity raises, as the current balance sheet appears ill-equipped to absorb prolonged periods of negative cash flow.
As indicated by the company's financial history, the P/S ratio is frequently misapplied to XTKG, as it obscures the fundamental shift in revenue quality from high-margin software services to volatile, low-margin cryptocurrency mining and capital-intensive agricultural projects that carry entirely different risk profiles.
Analysts should instead focus on cash-flow-based metrics or segment-specific margins to evaluate the company's true earning power. Relying on aggregate revenue multiples fails to account for the fact that a significant portion of the company's top-line may be non-recurring or highly sensitive to external commodity and token price fluctuations.
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying XTKG stock.
X3 Holdings Co., Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -0.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
X3 Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -78.6%. The historical average is 7.5%.
Based on historical data, X3 Holdings Co., Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
X3 Holdings Co., Ltd. has 39.8% gross margin and -718.3% operating margin.