Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 25.7x · EV/EBITDA 15.6x · ROE 5.7%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $193M | $153M | $124M | $102M | $87M | $134M | $116M | $251M | $291M | $556M | $490M |
| Enterprise Value | $177M | $137M | $108M | $91M | $70M | $125M | $111M | $210M | $249M | $502M | $456M |
| P/E Ratio → | 25.75 | 21.78 | 55.81 | 10.74 | — | 13.77 | — | 42.31 | 10.86 | 27.82 | 21.66 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.97 | 1.56 | 1.30 | 1.14 | 1.27 | 1.84 | 1.78 | 2.98 | 2.38 | 4.16 | 3.98 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.43 | 1.21 | 1.01 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 1.14 | 0.89 | 1.69 | 1.80 | 3.56 | 3.35 |
| P/FCF | 10.79 | 8.55 | 5.88 | — | 1.69 | 6.99 | — | 8.09 | 9.53 | 11.87 | 10.75 |
| P/OCF | 10.74 | 8.51 | 5.85 | — | 1.68 | 6.93 | — | 7.79 | 9.23 | 11.58 | 10.34 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.40 | 1.14 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.71 | 1.70 | 2.50 | 2.04 | 3.75 | 3.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.58 | 12.06 | 19.34 | 8.38 | — | 15.03 | — | 28.93 | 6.47 | 13.64 | 12.35 |
| EV / EBIT | 25.61 | 14.14 | 18.90 | 26.31 | 31.31 | 21.01 | — | 32.36 | 7.51 | 12.71 | 13.56 |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.65 | 5.14 | — | 1.35 | 6.52 | — | 6.78 | 8.16 | 10.72 | 10.01 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 86.5% | 86.5% | 40.9% | 41.1% | 41.6% | 41.8% | 35.3% | 40.4% | 51.0% | 51.4% | 50.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 7.1% | 0.9% | 6.7% | -7.1% | 8.2% | -5.3% | 5.5% | 29.4% | 25.3% | 27.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.2% | 7.2% | 2.3% | 11.8% | -6.7% | 13.4% | -13.7% | 7.0% | 21.9% | 14.9% | 18.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.7% | 5.7% | 1.8% | 9.1% | -4.0% | 7.9% | -6.4% | 3.8% | 16.8% | 13.2% | 16.2% |
| ROA | 4.5% | 4.5% | 1.4% | 7.0% | -3.2% | 6.8% | -5.5% | 3.1% | 13.7% | 10.7% | 12.5% |
| ROIC | 3.9% | 3.9% | 0.5% | 3.6% | -3.0% | 3.4% | -1.7% | 2.1% | 16.4% | 16.8% | 18.2% |
| ROCE | 5.4% | 5.4% | 0.6% | 4.6% | -3.9% | 4.6% | -2.3% | 2.8% | 21.6% | 21.8% | 23.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.57 | 0.84 | — | 0.74 | — | 1.29 | 0.28 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.13 | -0.13 | -0.09 | -0.16 | -0.08 | -0.04 | -0.27 | -0.26 | -0.35 | -0.23 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.42 | -1.42 | -2.80 | -1.05 | — | -1.09 | — | -5.56 | -1.08 | -1.47 | -0.91 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.90 | -0.74 | — | -0.35 | -0.47 | — | -1.30 | -1.37 | -1.16 | -0.74 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($26M) exceeds total debt ($10M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.81 | 1.81 | 2.66 | 3.01 | 3.30 | 5.92 | 8.17 | 5.48 | 5.15 | 4.38 | 3.91 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.81 | 1.81 | 2.66 | 3.01 | 3.30 | 5.92 | 8.17 | 5.48 | 5.15 | 4.38 | 3.91 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.90 | 1.35 | 0.96 | 1.10 | 2.33 | 1.93 | 1.72 | 1.14 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 75.8% | 75.8% | 246.0% | 52.0% | — | 234.9% | — | 441.4% | 92.0% | 109.7% | 85.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.9% | 4.6% | 1.8% | 9.3% | — | 7.3% | — | 2.4% | 9.2% | 3.6% | 4.6% |
| FCF Yield | 9.3% | 11.7% | 17.0% | — | 59.0% | 14.3% | — | 12.4% | 10.5% | 8.4% | 9.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $9M | $9M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $9M | $8M | $8M |
Operating margin volatility
According to recent market data, Westwood Holdings Group trades at a trailing P/E of 25.22, which appears disconnected from its stagnant growth profile when compared to peers like Hennessy Advisors, suggesting investors may be pricing in speculative recovery potential rather than current fundamental earnings power.
The significant disparity between the trailing P/E and the forward P/E of 2.45 implies that the market anticipates a massive, non-recurring earnings event or a fundamental shift in profitability that is not yet supported by historical trends. Investors should monitor whether this valuation gap is a result of market mispricing or an expectation of successful integration of recent acquisitions.
As reported in quarterly financial statements, Westwood's operating margin has frequently dipped into negative territory, reaching -18.4% in 2024Q2, which indicates that the firm's high-fixed-cost structure struggles to achieve the necessary scale to generate consistent profitability in the current competitive asset management environment.
While the gross margin remains high at 86.55%, the inability to convert this into operating profit suggests that compensation and administrative overhead are consuming the majority of the firm's value. This structural inefficiency warrants further investigation into whether the firm can achieve operating leverage without sacrificing the quality of its investment team.
Based on historical data, Westwood's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive momentum, fluctuating between -2.5% and 2.2% over the last ten quarters, which suggests that the firm is failing to compound capital effectively compared to more efficient boutique peers within the capital markets sector.
The low and inconsistent returns on invested capital indicate that the firm's capital allocation, particularly regarding recent acquisitions, has not yet yielded the expected accretive benefits. Investors should be cautious, as the current trend suggests that the firm is merely maintaining its asset base rather than generating meaningful economic value for shareholders.
As indicated by comparative financial metrics, Westwood's operating margin profile lags significantly behind peers like Virtus Investment Partners, highlighting a structural disadvantage in cost management that may be exacerbated by the firm's specific regional focus and reliance on active value-oriented investment strategies.
While peers have successfully pivoted toward higher-growth alternative strategies, Westwood's continued reliance on traditional value management appears to be a drag on its relative performance. The gap in profitability metrics suggests that Westwood's business model may be less resilient to the industry-wide shift toward passive investment vehicles than its competitors.
Based on an analysis of the firm's business model, the Price-to-Book ratio is a frequently misapplied metric for Westwood, as it fails to capture the value of the firm's intangible trust charter and human capital, which are the primary drivers of its long-term competitive advantage.
Relying on P/B obscures the reality that Westwood is a service-based entity where physical assets are secondary to the fiduciary and custodial capabilities embedded in its trust charter. Analysts should instead focus on AUM-based valuation multiples or fee-realization rates to better assess the firm's true economic potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WHG stock.
Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 25.7x. The historical average is 24.1x. This places it at the 59th percentile of its historical range.
Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.1x.
Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.7%. The historical average is 15.7%.
Based on historical data, Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 25.7x. This is at the 59th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.97% with a payout ratio of 75.8%.
Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. has 86.5% gross margin and 7.1% operating margin.
Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.