Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -37.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -14.1%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.4B | $3.4B | $882M | $1.2B | $977M | $1.1B | $516M | $183M | $238M | $127M | $93M |
| Enterprise Value | $4.1B | $4.0B | $846M | $1.1B | $916M | $1.0B | $497M | $188M | $239M | $136M | $105M |
| P/E Ratio → | -37.22 | — | — | 11.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 52.19 | 51.33 | 11.29 | 30.36 | 78.07 | 358.79 | 311.32 | 31.15 | 7.50 | 4.09 | 1.70 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.69 | 4.96 | 1.66 | 3.04 | 4.00 | 3.87 | 3.28 | 1.40 | 1.64 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 60.59 | 10.83 | 28.88 | 73.16 | 323.59 | 299.62 | 32.02 | 7.54 | 4.37 | 1.93 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 10.95 | — | 685.97 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 20.9% | 21.8% | 41.7% | -1.2% | -97.5% | 100.0% | -244.9% | 39.8% | 21.3% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | -153.4% | -153.4% | -47.6% | -85.3% | -359.1% | -1112.6% | -1485.3% | -691.9% | -67.2% | -78.5% | -68.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -129.9% | -129.9% | -61.1% | 263.3% | -478.2% | 48.4% | -1675.3% | -647.5% | -79.6% | -89.4% | -72.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -14.1% | -14.1% | -10.5% | 32.0% | -22.2% | 0.7% | -19.3% | -27.6% | -18.6% | -20.9% | -28.4% |
| ROA | -8.5% | -8.5% | -9.4% | 29.5% | -20.3% | 0.6% | -15.5% | -20.4% | -13.2% | -14.5% | -20.3% |
| ROIC | -8.5% | -8.5% | -6.8% | -9.6% | -18.4% | -16.5% | -13.5% | -21.6% | -11.3% | -12.8% | -18.2% |
| ROCE | -10.5% | -10.5% | -7.9% | -10.0% | -15.9% | -14.8% | -15.2% | -23.8% | -11.7% | -13.5% | -20.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.21 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.90 | -0.07 | -0.15 | -0.25 | -0.38 | -0.12 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | -361.11 | 27.81 | -28.28 | -24.55 | -13.73 | -12.32 | -16.42 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 30.69 | 30.69 | 3.88 | 22.46 | 7.28 | 24.42 | 4.26 | 1.91 | 6.87 | 4.36 | 2.98 |
| Quick Ratio | 28.34 | 28.34 | 2.76 | 18.71 | 5.23 | 19.38 | 2.02 | 0.90 | 5.00 | 2.69 | 1.60 |
| Cash Ratio | 27.59 | 27.59 | 2.01 | 18.39 | 4.03 | 18.48 | 1.82 | 0.78 | 4.71 | 1.88 | 1.40 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.92 | 0.57 | 0.33 | 0.20 | — | 0.89 | 1.15 | 1.48 | 2.69 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 99.76 | 176.45 | 7.85 | 15.14 | 453.27 | 257.35 | 78.04 | 13.70 | 14.73 | 2.44 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 8.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $233M | $172M | $160M | $157M | $150M | $121M | $96M | $83M | $71M | $56M |
Execution and dilution risk
According to recent market data, UUUU trades at a P/S ratio of 54.75, a valuation multiple that appears to price in significant future rare earth element processing success rather than current earnings power, as evidenced by the company's negative TTM P/E of -39.04.
The elevated P/S multiple suggests that investors are assigning a 'mill premium' to the company's unique regulatory infrastructure, effectively valuing it as a strategic asset rather than a traditional commodity producer. This valuation approach warrants caution, as the lack of positive earnings or EBITDA makes traditional valuation metrics less reliable for assessing the company's current fundamental floor.
Based on reported financial statements, UUUU's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -1.0% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value through its aggressive capital expenditure program rather than compounding returns on its invested capital base.
The persistent negative ROIC trend highlights the difficulty of generating returns while the company is in a heavy development phase for its REE separation circuits. Investors should monitor whether the transition from development to commercial-scale production can eventually drive returns above the company's cost of capital, which currently appears unlikely given the high fixed-cost structure.
As reported in quarterly filings, the company's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.02 in 2026Q1, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the White Mesa Mill and the intermittent, campaign-based revenue model that prevents consistent utilization of its operational assets.
The extreme volatility in the cash conversion cycle, which has seen massive swings in DIO and DSO, suggests that inventory management is highly sensitive to the timing of mill campaigns. This lack of operational consistency makes it difficult to gauge true working capital efficiency, as the company's metrics are frequently distorted by the timing of feedstock acquisition and product sales.
According to recent balance sheet data, the company's debt-to-equity ratio has risen to 0.93 as of 2026Q1, marking a significant departure from its historical reliance on equity financing and introducing new interest-related risks to the company's capital structure.
While the company maintains a substantial liquidity buffer, the shift toward debt financing suggests that management is increasingly comfortable leveraging the balance sheet to fund its strategic pivot. Investors should monitor whether this increased leverage will constrain future operational flexibility if the rare earth element segment fails to generate meaningful cash flow in the near term.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for UUUU is the P/E multiple, which obscures the company's true business model as a specialty chemical processor by focusing on volatile uranium earnings that are frequently distorted by non-cash inventory adjustments and campaign-based revenue recognition.
Analysts should instead focus on the company's ability to monetize its processing infrastructure through 'mill-as-a-service' contracts, as this provides a more accurate reflection of the company's competitive moat. Relying on traditional uranium mining valuation multiples risks ignoring the strategic value of the White Mesa Mill, which is the core driver of the company's long-term potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UUUU stock.
Energy Fuels Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -37.2x. The historical average is 24.1x.
Energy Fuels Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -14.1%. The historical average is -45.0%.
Based on historical data, Energy Fuels Inc. is trading at a P/E of -37.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Energy Fuels Inc. has 20.9% gross margin and -153.4% operating margin.