Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -27.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -20.2%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $676M | $331M | $140M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $575M | $231M | $137M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -27.09 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 60.33 | 29.59 | 25.16 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.98 | 1.89 | 9.45 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 20.61 | 24.55 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 33.6% | 33.6% | 27.8% | — | — | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -224.6% | -224.6% | -305.3% | — | — | -3244.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -171.4% | -171.4% | -574.6% | — | — | -3244.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -20.2% | -20.2% | -394.0% | -103.3% | -33.0% | -4.1% |
| ROA | -19.3% | -19.3% | -362.7% | -98.1% | -32.4% | -4.1% |
| ROIC | -19.6% | -19.6% | -153.9% | -77.5% | -24.8% | — |
| ROCE | -25.8% | -25.8% | -204.9% | -103.3% | -33.6% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.58 | -0.23 | -0.63 | -0.97 | -0.97 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -48462.54 | -48462.54 | -272.50 | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($103M) exceeds total debt ($3M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 61.32 | 61.32 | 6.53 | 8.87 | 23.79 | — |
| Quick Ratio | 61.32 | 61.32 | 6.53 | 8.87 | 23.79 | — |
| Cash Ratio | 39.70 | 39.70 | 4.02 | 7.81 | 23.49 | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.35 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $26M | $8M | $8M | $7M | $7M |
Unsustainable operating burn rate
According to reported financial data, UMAC trades at a P/S multiple of 57.47, a figure that appears significantly detached from the company's current negative operating margins and suggests investors are pricing in future growth potential rather than existing hardware-driven revenue streams or established profitability metrics.
The elevated P/S ratio indicates that the market is valuing the company as a speculative platform rather than a traditional hardware manufacturer. This valuation warrants caution, as it implies an aggressive growth trajectory that the current transactional revenue model may struggle to sustain without significant margin expansion.
Based on recent quarterly filings, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, bottoming at -51.2% in 2024Q4, which highlights a fundamental inability to generate returns on invested capital while the firm remains in an early-stage integration phase following its recent acquisition-led transformation.
The negative ROIC trend suggests that the capital deployed into the Fat Shark and Rotor Riot acquisitions has yet to yield productive economic returns. Investors should monitor whether management can improve capital efficiency as the business moves past the initial integration and carve-out phase.
As reported in financial statements, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained extremely low, hovering near 0.03 to 0.12, which suggests that the firm's massive cash balance is currently acting as a drag on overall asset efficiency rather than fueling operational throughput.
The low asset turnover reflects a business model that is currently capital-heavy but operationally light. The lack of meaningful inventory turnover data further complicates the assessment of how effectively the company manages its hardware supply chain relative to its e-commerce marketplace volume.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the company maintains a current ratio of 128.23 as of 2026Q1, a figure that is structurally inflated by a massive cash position rather than typical working capital management, providing a significant but potentially temporary buffer against ongoing operational losses.
While the liquidity position appears robust, it is important to distinguish between solvency and operational viability. The current ratio suggests the company is not at risk of immediate insolvency, but the underlying burn rate indicates that this cash pile is being consumed to support a high-cost corporate structure.
As indicated by the company's unique financial profile, the P/S ratio is a highly misleading metric for UMAC, as it fails to account for the massive cash-to-revenue discrepancy and the inorganic nature of the recent revenue growth following the acquisition of Fat Shark and Rotor Riot.
Investors should prioritize EV/EBITDA or adjusted cash-flow-based metrics over P/S, as the latter ignores the significant cash balance that currently dominates the balance sheet. Relying on P/S risks overestimating the company's operational value by conflating cash-rich shell status with actual hardware-driven earning power.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UMAC stock.
Unusual Machines, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -27.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Unusual Machines, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -20.2%. The historical average is -110.9%.
Based on historical data, Unusual Machines, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -27.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Unusual Machines, Inc. has 33.6% gross margin and -224.6% operating margin.