Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.7x · EV/EBITDA 25.3x · ROE 39.8%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $154.0B | $173.2B | $129.7B | $128.8B | $48.8B | $79.4B | $89.4B | $37.1B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $159.7B | $178.9B | $134.7B | $135.1B | $55.7B | $86.0B | $93.9B | $33.9B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.71 | 17.27 | 13.23 | 70.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.96 | 3.33 | 2.95 | 3.45 | 1.53 | 4.55 | 8.03 | 2.86 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 5.61 | 6.17 | 5.77 | 10.16 | 5.74 | 5.17 | 6.50 | 2.45 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 15.77 | 17.74 | 18.81 | 38.31 | 125.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 15.25 | 17.15 | 18.18 | 35.92 | 76.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.44 | 3.06 | 3.62 | 1.75 | 4.93 | 8.43 | 2.61 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.30 | 28.35 | 38.10 | 69.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 28.70 | 28.68 | 28.98 | 45.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.33 | 19.54 | 40.20 | 142.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.8% | 39.8% | 39.4% | 39.8% | 38.3% | 46.4% | 53.7% | 53.4% | 54.1% | 30.5% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 10.7% | 6.4% | 3.0% | -5.7% | -22.0% | -43.7% | -66.1% | -29.1% | -51.4% | -78.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 19.3% | 19.3% | 22.4% | 5.1% | -28.7% | -2.8% | -60.6% | -65.2% | 9.6% | -50.8% | -9.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 39.8% | 39.8% | 56.1% | 17.8% | -76.6% | -3.4% | -46.7% | -77.2% | 19.1% | -77.7% | -5.5% |
| ROA | 17.8% | 17.8% | 21.9% | 5.3% | -25.8% | -1.4% | -20.8% | -30.4% | 5.1% | -25.9% | -2.4% |
| ROIC | 13.6% | 13.6% | 9.0% | 4.8% | -7.4% | -14.3% | -24.2% | -59.1% | -32.4% | -78.2% | -62.8% |
| ROCE | 12.5% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 4.2% | -6.9% | -13.7% | -18.5% | -37.5% | -19.4% | -32.8% | -22.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.93 | 1.38 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.51 | 1.40 | 1.39 | 0.46 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.13 | 2.13 | 3.23 | 6.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.50 | 0.80 | 0.44 | 0.33 | -0.21 | 0.45 | 0.15 | -0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.41 | 3.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.59 | 0.72 | 1.89 | 17.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 14.18 | 14.18 | 8.89 | 4.67 | -15.68 | -1.12 | -14.17 | -14.09 | 3.02 | -8.55 | -8.63 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.07 | 1.19 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 1.44 | 2.47 | 2.03 | 1.78 | 2.89 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.07 | 1.19 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 1.44 | 2.47 | 2.03 | 1.78 | 2.89 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 1.03 | 2.02 | 1.52 | 1.18 | 2.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 0.24 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 26.85 | 31.66 | 40.35 | 39.95 | 62.57 | 50.36 | 46.10 | 46.71 | 42.61 | 36.74 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.4% | 5.8% | 7.6% | 1.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.3% | 5.6% | 5.3% | 2.6% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 4.2% | 3.8% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.2% | 3.8% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2.1B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.5B |
Regulatory worker classification shifts
Based on current market data, Uber's forward P/E of 23.07 suggests investors are pricing in sustained earnings growth, though the EV/EBITDA multiple of 25.91 appears elevated compared to traditional logistics peers, indicating a premium for the company's unique multi-segment network effect and high-margin advertising potential.
The valuation gap between Uber and pure-play logistics firms suggests the market is increasingly viewing the company as a software-driven marketplace rather than a transportation utility. Investors should monitor whether the forward earnings multiple remains supported by the ongoing expansion of high-margin retail media revenue, which may justify a higher terminal value than historical ride-sharing models.
As reported in recent financial statements, Uber's ROIC has trended toward 4.1% in 2026Q1, reflecting a gradual improvement in capital productivity as the company shifts from aggressive market-share acquisition to a more disciplined focus on operational efficiency and the monetization of its existing global user base.
While the ROIC remains modest, the upward trajectory from 0.7% in 2024Q1 suggests that management's divestiture of non-core, capital-intensive units is successfully enhancing the return profile of the remaining business. This trend warrants further investigation to determine if the company can sustain this compounding effect without requiring significant new capital injections for autonomous vehicle infrastructure.
According to quarterly filings, Uber's DSO has fluctuated between 24 and 39 days over the last ten quarters, suggesting that the company maintains effective control over its receivables despite the inherent complexity of managing a global, multi-sided marketplace across diverse regulatory and payment environments.
The consistency in DSO indicates that the platform's payment processing infrastructure is functioning efficiently, minimizing the risk of liquidity traps within the working capital cycle. Investors should monitor whether the recent compression in DSO to 26 days in 2026Q1 is a structural improvement or merely a temporary result of shifts in the geographic revenue mix.
Based on the provided balance sheet data, Uber has successfully reduced its debt-to-equity ratio to 0.62 as of 2026Q1, a significant improvement from the 0.93 level observed in 2023Q4, which suggests a more comfortable debt service profile and reduced reliance on external financing for ongoing operations.
The improvement in interest coverage, which reached 3.23x in 2026Q1, indicates that the company is better positioned to manage its debt obligations in a volatile interest rate environment. This deleveraging trend appears to be a deliberate management strategy to strengthen the balance sheet, providing the necessary flexibility to pursue strategic capital allocation, such as the recent share repurchase programs.
As evidenced by the significant variance in quarterly net margins, the P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to Uber because it fails to account for the non-cash volatility stemming from the revaluation of minority equity stakes in global logistics peers, which often obscures the core operating performance.
Analysts should prioritize Adjusted EBITDA or Operating Margin over GAAP net income to better gauge the underlying earning power of the mobility and delivery segments. Relying on P/E ratios without adjusting for these non-operating investment fluctuations may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's true operational health and cash-generative capacity.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UBER stock.
Uber Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 15.7x. The historical average is 33.8x. This places it at the 33th percentile of its historical range.
Uber Technologies, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 25.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 45.5x.
Uber Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 39.8%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -15.4%.
Based on historical data, Uber Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 15.7x. This is at the 33th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Uber Technologies, Inc. has 39.8% gross margin and 10.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.