VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
TXMD
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
TXMDTherapeuticsMD, Inc.
$1.97$23M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. TXMD
  4. Financial Ratios

TherapeuticsMD, Inc. (TXMD) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -40.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -2.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

TXMD Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Market Cap$23M$19M$10M$23M$50M$143M$334M$596M$857M$1.2B$1.1B
Enterprise Value$20M$16M$12M$27M$21M$276M$502M$641M$769M$1.1B$1000M
P/E Ratio →-40.04——————————
P/S Ratio7.556.245.6318.040.7255.695.1412.0153.2573.9958.45
P/B Ratio0.850.700.360.801.44——64.798.799.568.87
P/FCF9.417.7813.55————————
P/OCF9.417.7813.55————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

TXMD EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
EV / Revenue—5.466.8320.870.30107.297.7312.9047.7766.4151.66
EV / EBITDA————8.85——————
EV / EBIT————1.98——————
EV / FCF—6.8116.44————————

TXMD Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Gross Margin100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%98.0%45.5%75.4%87.2%83.0%84.3%78.4%
Operating Margin-139.4%-139.4%-270.3%-654.6%1.7%-3092.8%-239.8%-304.6%-808.8%-462.7%-466.3%
Net Profit Margin-18.8%-18.8%-123.9%-789.4%160.1%-6700.9%-282.9%-354.8%-823.7%-458.5%-464.3%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
ROE-2.1%-2.1%-7.7%-31.9%318.7%——-330.1%-116.6%-59.8%-94.3%
ROA-1.5%-1.5%-5.3%-15.4%86.2%-98.2%-82.0%-73.7%-74.7%-53.9%-83.1%
ROIC-11.7%-11.7%-11.4%-32.9%4.0%-143.3%-238.6%-360.3%-1619.0%-2099.5%—
ROCE-12.7%-12.7%-13.6%-21.3%2.7%-408.6%-92.8%-78.8%-86.6%-60.3%-94.7%

TXMD Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Debt / Equity0.190.190.260.270.25——22.310.75——
Debt / EBITDA————3.66——————
Net Debt / Equity—-0.090.080.13-0.83——4.83-0.90-0.98-1.03
Net Debt / EBITDA————-12.26——————
Debt / FCF—-0.972.89————————
Interest Coverage——-367.58——-2.17-5.51-9.18-27.35——

Net cash position: cash ($7M) exceeds total debt ($5M)

TXMD Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Current Ratio3.023.021.921.721.180.472.173.934.5510.489.30
Quick Ratio3.023.021.921.721.180.442.033.714.4710.369.23
Cash Ratio1.561.560.980.630.810.261.363.033.939.548.78
Asset Turnover—0.080.050.030.770.020.360.190.080.120.14
Inventory Turnover—————0.182.000.530.841.783.89
Days Sales Outstanding—425.75738.29866.24—5131.85182.20179.36250.8394.1784.87

TXMD Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Dividend Yield———————————
Payout Ratio———————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Earnings Yield———————————
FCF Yield10.6%12.9%7.4%————————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%76.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%76.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Shares Outstanding—$12M$12M$10M$9M$8M$6M$5M$5M$4M$4M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeMixed
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Administrative overhead exceeding revenue

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q1)

Market Pricing Reflects Distressed Stub

Based on reported figures, TXMD trades at a P/S ratio of 8.08, which appears to price the company as a speculative royalty vehicle rather than an operating entity, given the lack of forward P/E visibility and the persistent negative earnings reported in recent SEC filings.

The elevated P/S multiple relative to the company's lack of profitability suggests that investors are assigning value to the potential of the underlying royalty stream rather than current financial performance. This valuation appears highly sensitive to the commercial success of Mayne Pharma, as the market is essentially pricing a call option on the licensee's ability to drive volume for ANNOVERA and BIJUVA.

Capital Compounding Remains Structurally Impaired

As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -2.3% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the firm is currently unable to generate returns on invested capital that exceed its cost of capital following the divestiture of its core commercial assets.

The persistent negative ROIC highlights the difficulty of maintaining a corporate shell that lacks the scale to offset its fixed administrative burden. Investors should monitor whether the company can achieve a positive return on capital as royalty streams mature, or if the current structure will continue to erode shareholder value through ongoing operational losses.

Working Capital Efficiency Remains Obscured

According to recent quarterly data, the company's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.02, reflecting a business model that has shed its revenue-generating operational assets in favor of a passive royalty structure that currently fails to utilize the balance sheet effectively.

The exceptionally high DSO figures, which have fluctuated significantly, suggest potential delays or complexities in the royalty collection process from licensees. This inefficiency in converting royalty rights into cash flow warrants further investigation into the contractual terms governing the timing and recognition of payments from Mayne Pharma.

Liquidity Constraints Threaten Operational Continuity

Based on the 2026Q1 current ratio of 3.11, the company appears to have sufficient short-term liquidity, yet this metric is misleading as it does not account for the persistent cash burn required to sustain the corporate entity's administrative and legal overhead.

While the current ratio suggests a buffer, the lack of consistent operating cash flow means that the company remains vulnerable to liquidity shocks if royalty inflows do not scale rapidly. The reliance on a limited cash balance of $7.48 million suggests that the firm may face significant pressure to secure additional funding if administrative costs are not brought under control.

Misapplication of Traditional Profitability Metrics

As indicated by the company's financial statements, the most commonly misapplied metric for TXMD is the gross margin, which at 100% creates a false impression of operational strength that obscures the underlying reality of a business model burdened by excessive fixed corporate overhead.

Investors often mistake the 100% gross margin for high profitability, failing to realize that it is merely a structural artifact of the licensing model rather than a sign of competitive advantage. A more accurate assessment of the company's health would focus on the 'contribution margin after G&A' to determine if the royalty stream can ever realistically cover the costs of the corporate shell.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

TXMD — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TXMD stock.

What is TherapeuticsMD, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

TherapeuticsMD, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -40.0x. The historical average is 3.1x.

What is TherapeuticsMD, Inc.'s ROE?

TherapeuticsMD, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -2.1%. The historical average is -29.9%.

Is TXMD stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, TherapeuticsMD, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -40.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are TherapeuticsMD, Inc.'s profit margins?

TherapeuticsMD, Inc. has 100.0% gross margin and -139.4% operating margin.