Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -40.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -2.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23M | $19M | $10M | $23M | $50M | $143M | $334M | $596M | $857M | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $20M | $16M | $12M | $27M | $21M | $276M | $502M | $641M | $769M | $1.1B | $1000M |
| P/E Ratio → | -40.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 7.55 | 6.24 | 5.63 | 18.04 | 0.72 | 55.69 | 5.14 | 12.01 | 53.25 | 73.99 | 58.45 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.36 | 0.80 | 1.44 | — | — | 64.79 | 8.79 | 9.56 | 8.87 |
| P/FCF | 9.41 | 7.78 | 13.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 9.41 | 7.78 | 13.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.46 | 6.83 | 20.87 | 0.30 | 107.29 | 7.73 | 12.90 | 47.77 | 66.41 | 51.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 8.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | 1.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 6.81 | 16.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 98.0% | 45.5% | 75.4% | 87.2% | 83.0% | 84.3% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | -139.4% | -139.4% | -270.3% | -654.6% | 1.7% | -3092.8% | -239.8% | -304.6% | -808.8% | -462.7% | -466.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -18.8% | -18.8% | -123.9% | -789.4% | 160.1% | -6700.9% | -282.9% | -354.8% | -823.7% | -458.5% | -464.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -2.1% | -2.1% | -7.7% | -31.9% | 318.7% | — | — | -330.1% | -116.6% | -59.8% | -94.3% |
| ROA | -1.5% | -1.5% | -5.3% | -15.4% | 86.2% | -98.2% | -82.0% | -73.7% | -74.7% | -53.9% | -83.1% |
| ROIC | -11.7% | -11.7% | -11.4% | -32.9% | 4.0% | -143.3% | -238.6% | -360.3% | -1619.0% | -2099.5% | — |
| ROCE | -12.7% | -12.7% | -13.6% | -21.3% | 2.7% | -408.6% | -92.8% | -78.8% | -86.6% | -60.3% | -94.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.25 | — | — | 22.31 | 0.75 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | 3.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.09 | 0.08 | 0.13 | -0.83 | — | — | 4.83 | -0.90 | -0.98 | -1.03 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | -12.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.97 | 2.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -367.58 | — | — | -2.17 | -5.51 | -9.18 | -27.35 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($7M) exceeds total debt ($5M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.02 | 3.02 | 1.92 | 1.72 | 1.18 | 0.47 | 2.17 | 3.93 | 4.55 | 10.48 | 9.30 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.02 | 3.02 | 1.92 | 1.72 | 1.18 | 0.44 | 2.03 | 3.71 | 4.47 | 10.36 | 9.23 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.56 | 1.56 | 0.98 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.26 | 1.36 | 3.03 | 3.93 | 9.54 | 8.78 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.77 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | 0.18 | 2.00 | 0.53 | 0.84 | 1.78 | 3.89 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 425.75 | 738.29 | 866.24 | — | 5131.85 | 182.20 | 179.36 | 250.83 | 94.17 | 84.87 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.6% | 12.9% | 7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 76.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 76.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $12M | $12M | $10M | $9M | $8M | $6M | $5M | $5M | $4M | $4M |
Administrative overhead exceeding revenue
Based on reported figures, TXMD trades at a P/S ratio of 8.08, which appears to price the company as a speculative royalty vehicle rather than an operating entity, given the lack of forward P/E visibility and the persistent negative earnings reported in recent SEC filings.
The elevated P/S multiple relative to the company's lack of profitability suggests that investors are assigning value to the potential of the underlying royalty stream rather than current financial performance. This valuation appears highly sensitive to the commercial success of Mayne Pharma, as the market is essentially pricing a call option on the licensee's ability to drive volume for ANNOVERA and BIJUVA.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -2.3% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the firm is currently unable to generate returns on invested capital that exceed its cost of capital following the divestiture of its core commercial assets.
The persistent negative ROIC highlights the difficulty of maintaining a corporate shell that lacks the scale to offset its fixed administrative burden. Investors should monitor whether the company can achieve a positive return on capital as royalty streams mature, or if the current structure will continue to erode shareholder value through ongoing operational losses.
According to recent quarterly data, the company's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.02, reflecting a business model that has shed its revenue-generating operational assets in favor of a passive royalty structure that currently fails to utilize the balance sheet effectively.
The exceptionally high DSO figures, which have fluctuated significantly, suggest potential delays or complexities in the royalty collection process from licensees. This inefficiency in converting royalty rights into cash flow warrants further investigation into the contractual terms governing the timing and recognition of payments from Mayne Pharma.
Based on the 2026Q1 current ratio of 3.11, the company appears to have sufficient short-term liquidity, yet this metric is misleading as it does not account for the persistent cash burn required to sustain the corporate entity's administrative and legal overhead.
While the current ratio suggests a buffer, the lack of consistent operating cash flow means that the company remains vulnerable to liquidity shocks if royalty inflows do not scale rapidly. The reliance on a limited cash balance of $7.48 million suggests that the firm may face significant pressure to secure additional funding if administrative costs are not brought under control.
As indicated by the company's financial statements, the most commonly misapplied metric for TXMD is the gross margin, which at 100% creates a false impression of operational strength that obscures the underlying reality of a business model burdened by excessive fixed corporate overhead.
Investors often mistake the 100% gross margin for high profitability, failing to realize that it is merely a structural artifact of the licensing model rather than a sign of competitive advantage. A more accurate assessment of the company's health would focus on the 'contribution margin after G&A' to determine if the royalty stream can ever realistically cover the costs of the corporate shell.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TXMD stock.
TherapeuticsMD, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -40.0x. The historical average is 3.1x.
TherapeuticsMD, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -2.1%. The historical average is -29.9%.
Based on historical data, TherapeuticsMD, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -40.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
TherapeuticsMD, Inc. has 100.0% gross margin and -139.4% operating margin.