Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 29.8x · EV/EBITDA 17.1x · ROE 9.3%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $71.7B | $57.2B | $48.3B | $36.7B | $36.2B | $41.3B | $34.9B | $45.2B | $29.4B | $38.7B | $31.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $114.5B | $117.9B | $107.4B | $96.7B | $94.2B | $93.8B | $83.3B | $94.2B | $79.2B | $81.1B | $75.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 29.81 | 16.82 | 10.50 | 12.95 | 56.73 | 22.79 | 7.82 | 11.37 | 7.93 | 12.92 | 257.06 |
| P/S Ratio | 6.69 | 3.77 | 3.51 | 2.76 | 2.94 | 3.08 | 2.68 | 3.41 | 2.15 | 2.88 | 2.50 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.75 | 1.55 | 1.26 | 0.94 | 1.06 | 1.24 | 1.04 | 1.40 | 0.95 | 1.44 | 1.20 |
| P/FCF | 49.30 | 27.77 | 36.10 | — | — | 42.74 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 13.83 | 7.79 | 6.28 | 5.05 | 5.67 | 5.99 | 4.94 | 6.38 | 4.48 | 7.40 | 6.17 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.76 | 7.80 | 7.29 | 7.65 | 7.00 | 6.41 | 7.11 | 5.79 | 6.03 | 6.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.11 | 12.43 | 12.52 | 11.16 | 12.31 | 11.12 | 9.93 | 11.42 | 9.86 | 12.31 | 12.60 |
| EV / EBIT | 24.15 | 13.35 | 12.74 | 16.44 | 35.46 | 22.43 | 12.00 | 13.48 | 13.85 | 16.90 | 34.06 |
| EV / FCF | — | 57.23 | 80.25 | — | — | 97.06 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 50.0% | 48.0% | 50.3% | 47.1% | 49.9% | 50.2% | 49.1% | 45.7% | 38.0% | 36.6% |
| Operating Margin | 44.2% | 44.2% | 42.0% | 44.4% | 41.2% | 44.1% | 44.6% | 43.7% | 41.5% | 33.7% | 32.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 23.2% | 23.2% | 34.1% | 22.0% | 6.1% | 14.6% | 35.5% | 31.2% | 27.1% | 23.5% | 1.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.3% | 9.3% | 12.1% | 8.0% | 2.2% | 5.8% | 14.0% | 13.1% | 12.8% | 11.9% | 1.1% |
| ROA | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.9% | 2.4% | 0.7% | 1.9% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 0.3% |
| ROIC | 5.2% | 5.2% | 4.4% | 4.6% | 4.3% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | 5.7% | 4.9% | 4.9% |
| ROCE | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5.2% | 5.6% | 5.4% | 6.6% | 6.6% | 6.7% | 7.0% | 5.8% | 5.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.56 | 1.63 | 1.72 | 1.59 | 1.49 | 1.55 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.73 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.43 | 6.43 | 6.98 | 7.35 | 7.67 | 6.31 | 5.95 | 6.11 | 6.26 | 6.60 | 7.53 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.65 | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.70 | 1.57 | 1.45 | 1.51 | 1.61 | 1.58 | 1.69 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.40 | 6.40 | 6.89 | 6.92 | 7.59 | 6.23 | 5.77 | 5.94 | 6.20 | 6.44 | 7.36 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 29.46 | 44.15 | — | — | 54.32 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.60 | 2.60 | 3.34 | 2.28 | 1.40 | 2.00 | 3.16 | 4.06 | 2.74 | 3.21 | 1.51 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.96 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.59 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 1.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.90 | 0.38 | 0.51 | 0.38 | 0.56 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 1.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Inventory Turnover | 9.71 | 9.71 | 9.59 | 8.56 | 6.96 | 9.26 | 10.28 | 14.92 | 17.24 | 22.07 | 21.55 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.28 | 82.40 | 79.34 | 120.69 | 122.99 | 64.41 | 70.91 | 71.88 | 68.45 | 60.57 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.5% | 6.1% | 8.2% | 7.6% | 8.8% | 8.0% | 8.6% | 4.0% | 5.3% | 3.5% | 4.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 99.7% | 99.7% | 84.1% | 95.4% | 426.7% | 169.7% | 64.7% | 43.4% | 42.4% | 42.4% | 616.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.4% | 5.9% | 9.5% | 7.7% | 1.8% | 4.4% | 12.8% | 8.8% | 12.6% | 7.7% | 0.4% |
| FCF Yield | 2.0% | 3.6% | 2.8% | — | — | 2.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.7% | 6.6% | 8.2% | 7.6% | 8.8% | 8.0% | 8.6% | 4.0% | 5.3% | 6.6% | 4.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $996M | $974M | $940M | $931M | $903M | $874M | $760M |
High leverage and execution
Based on current market data, TRP trades at a forward P/E of 19.16 and an EV/EBITDA of 11.51, suggesting that investors are applying a valuation discount relative to peers, likely reflecting historical capital project cost overruns and the ongoing complexity of the South Bow spin-off.
The current valuation multiples appear to price in a cautious outlook regarding the company's ability to deleverage while maintaining its growth trajectory. When compared to peers like Williams Companies or Enbridge, the lower multiple suggests the market remains skeptical of the firm's earnings quality and the potential for further balance sheet strain.
As reported in financial statements, TRP's ROIC has languished between 0.5% and 1.7% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company is struggling to generate returns on invested capital that exceed its cost of capital, a trend that warrants significant investor concern regarding long-term value creation.
The consistently low ROIC suggests that the massive capital expenditures required for pipeline expansion are not yet yielding commensurate returns. This performance gap relative to peers like ONEOK or Enterprise Products implies that the company's capital allocation strategy may be hampered by regulatory hurdles and project-specific cost inflation.
According to recent quarterly data, TRP's cash conversion cycle remains deeply negative, often exceeding -120 days, which is primarily driven by an exceptionally high days payable outstanding (DPO) that suggests the company is leveraging its supplier base to manage liquidity in a capital-intensive environment.
While a negative CCC is often a sign of efficiency, in TRP's case, it appears to be a structural necessity to offset the massive cash outflows required for ongoing infrastructure projects. Investors should monitor whether this reliance on extended payment terms to suppliers is sustainable or if it masks underlying liquidity pressures.
As indicated by the quarterly balance sheet data, TRP maintains a debt-to-equity ratio consistently above 1.50, which, when coupled with an interest coverage ratio that has trended toward 2.5x, suggests that the company's financial flexibility is increasingly constrained by its significant debt service obligations.
The high leverage profile leaves the company vulnerable to interest rate volatility, particularly as it attempts to fund its capital program. The persistent debt-to-EBITDA levels suggest that management's deleveraging efforts are critical to maintaining credit quality and avoiding further pressure on the equity valuation.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to TRP, as it fails to account for the massive non-cash depreciation and amortization charges inherent in midstream infrastructure, which significantly distort net income and obscure the company's true ability to generate recurring cash flow from its regulated asset base.
Analysts should prioritize EV/EBITDA or Price-to-Distributable Cash Flow (P/DCF) to better assess the company's operational performance. Relying on P/E ignores the impact of accounting nuances like AFUDC, which can artificially inflate earnings and lead to a misunderstanding of the firm's actual financial health.
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TRP stock.
TC Energy Corporation's current P/E ratio is 29.8x. The historical average is 15.4x. This places it at the 96th percentile of its historical range.
TC Energy Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 17.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.9x.
TC Energy Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 9.3%. The historical average is 9.6%.
Based on historical data, TC Energy Corporation is trading at a P/E of 29.8x. This is at the 96th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
TC Energy Corporation's current dividend yield is 3.46% with a payout ratio of 99.7%.
TC Energy Corporation has 50.0% gross margin and 44.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
TC Energy Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.