Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 32.1x · EV/EBITDA 15.3x · ROE 48.4%. (2008–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $58.8B | $39.7B | $39.5B | $19.6B | $17.0B | $11.9B | $6.1B | $9.5B | $8.1B | $10.0B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $76.2B | $57.0B | $53.6B | $32.5B | $28.3B | $18.4B | $13.7B | $17.0B | $14.5B | $14.9B | $15.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 32.14 | 21.65 | 31.10 | 23.71 | 18.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.43 | 2.31 | 2.38 | 1.26 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 1.09 | 0.77 | 1.13 | 1.56 |
| P/B Ratio | 18.41 | 12.40 | 8.94 | 4.26 | 3.41 | 2.31 | 1.04 | 1.12 | 1.08 | 1.48 | 1.81 |
| P/FCF | 100.62 | 67.91 | 57.76 | 23.76 | 16.23 | 6.64 | 7.73 | — | — | — | 37.62 |
| P/OCF | 15.00 | 10.13 | 10.82 | 6.11 | 7.13 | 5.19 | 3.51 | 6.83 | 7.06 | 10.66 | 12.37 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.33 | 3.22 | 2.08 | 1.31 | 1.06 | 1.65 | 1.96 | 1.37 | 1.68 | 2.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.35 | 11.50 | 12.25 | 9.23 | 7.90 | 6.83 | 6.41 | 14.63 | 10.84 | 13.16 | 15.39 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.09 | 17.08 | 19.82 | 12.36 | 13.43 | 22.33 | — | 58.51 | 44.79 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 97.67 | 78.39 | 39.34 | 27.07 | 10.24 | 17.26 | — | — | — | 55.08 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.5% | 26.5% | 20.0% | 16.2% | 12.9% | 12.0% | 18.4% | 17.2% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 6.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 20.1% | 17.7% | 14.0% | 11.5% | 10.4% | 15.3% | 2.2% | 4.9% | 3.6% | 3.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.8% | 10.8% | 7.6% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 0.4% | -18.8% | -2.4% | 0.0% | 0.6% | -2.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 48.4% | 48.4% | 28.1% | 17.3% | 22.5% | 1.3% | -21.7% | -2.6% | 0.0% | 0.9% | -3.1% |
| ROA | 7.7% | 7.7% | 5.8% | 4.1% | 6.6% | 0.5% | -9.0% | -1.2% | 0.0% | 0.4% | -1.4% |
| ROIC | 13.2% | 13.2% | 12.3% | 9.7% | 13.3% | 10.9% | 6.4% | 1.0% | 3.0% | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| ROCE | 16.7% | 16.7% | 15.7% | 12.7% | 16.9% | 13.5% | 8.2% | 1.2% | 3.9% | 2.6% | 1.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 5.49 | 5.49 | 3.23 | 2.82 | 2.32 | 1.28 | 1.32 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.85 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.54 | 3.54 | 3.26 | 3.69 | 3.23 | 2.46 | 3.66 | 6.76 | 4.98 | 4.45 | 4.95 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 5.43 | 3.19 | 2.79 | 2.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.84 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.22 | 3.65 | 3.17 | 2.40 | 3.54 | 6.47 | 4.80 | 4.33 | 4.88 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 29.76 | 20.63 | 15.58 | 10.84 | 3.60 | 9.53 | — | — | — | 17.46 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.92 | 3.92 | 3.53 | 3.82 | 4.73 | 2.13 | -3.02 | 0.86 | 1.26 | -0.25 | -0.02 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 0.79 | 0.86 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.74 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 1.11 | 1.15 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.52 |
| Inventory Turnover | 29.33 | 29.33 | 39.79 | 35.22 | 47.97 | 100.05 | 37.19 | 44.46 | 59.36 | 40.78 | 45.27 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 31.41 | 35.53 | 34.38 | 23.71 | 27.87 | 38.07 | 35.99 | 29.93 | 34.08 | 40.78 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.4% | 2.1% | 1.6% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.6% | 6.5% | 10.2% | 11.2% | 8.4% | 5.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 44.4% | 44.4% | 48.5% | 51.6% | 33.2% | 263.3% | — | — | 56768.8% | 1561.5% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.1% | 4.6% | 3.2% | 4.2% | 5.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 4.2% | 6.2% | 15.1% | 12.9% | — | — | — | 2.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.1% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 7.0% | 0.4% | 4.4% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.5% | 3.7% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 9.2% | 2.0% | 10.8% | 10.3% | 11.3% | 8.4% | 5.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $215M | $221M | $226M | $231M | $229M | $232M | $233M | $224M | $207M | $185M |
Permian Basin volume dependency
Based on current market data, TRGP trades at a 32.00x TTM P/E, a significant premium compared to midstream peers like MPLX and WES, suggesting that investors are pricing in aggressive future growth rather than the traditional yield-focused utility profile typical of the broader energy infrastructure sector.
The forward P/E of 25.20 indicates that the market expects substantial earnings expansion to justify the current entry point. This valuation appears to hinge on the successful monetization of recent Permian Basin infrastructure investments, as the current multiple leaves little room for error if throughput growth fails to materialize.
According to quarterly financial reports, TRGP's ROIC has remained range-bound between 2.7% and 3.4% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company's massive capital deployment into new fractionation and gathering assets has yet to generate a meaningful improvement in long-term compounding returns on invested capital.
The persistent gap between the company's cost of capital and these low single-digit returns warrants further investigation into whether the current infrastructure expansion strategy is value-accretive. Investors should monitor whether future utilization rates at the Mont Belvieu complex can drive ROIC higher as these projects reach full operational maturity.
As evidenced by the negative cash conversion cycle of -15 days in 2026Q1, TRGP effectively utilizes supplier credit to manage its working capital, yet the significant quarterly fluctuations in DSO and DPO suggest that operational efficiency remains highly sensitive to the timing of commodity-related cash flows.
The volatility in the cash conversion cycle reflects the inherent complexity of managing a large-scale gathering and processing network where commodity purchase cycles often mismatch with revenue collection. This suggests that while the company maintains a structural advantage in managing payables, its liquidity position remains vulnerable to sudden shifts in commodity pricing and volume throughput.
Based on reported figures, TRGP's debt-to-equity ratio has climbed to 5.85 as of 2026Q1, a marked increase from 2.82 in 2023Q4, which indicates that the company is increasingly relying on external leverage to fund its aggressive infrastructure expansion and consolidation strategy within the Permian Basin.
While the company's scale provides some cushion, the rising debt burden suggests that interest coverage may become a point of concern if commodity price volatility impacts operating cash flows. Investors should monitor whether management can deleverage the balance sheet once the current phase of capital-intensive projects is completed.
The most commonly misapplied metric for TRGP is the dividend yield, which at 1.4% appears low compared to MLP peers, yet this obscures the company's strategic shift toward a growth-oriented C-Corp model that prioritizes capital reinvestment over the high-payout structures typical of the midstream sector.
Analysts focusing solely on yield may misinterpret the company's capital allocation as a lack of shareholder return, failing to account for the value created through infrastructure expansion and debt reduction. A more appropriate metric for evaluating TRGP's performance would be the growth in distributable cash flow per share, which better captures the underlying value creation of its integrated Permian assets.
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TRGP stock.
Targa Resources Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 32.1x. The historical average is 37.1x. This places it at the 56th percentile of its historical range.
Targa Resources Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.7x.
Targa Resources Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 48.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 6.2%.
Based on historical data, Targa Resources Corp. is trading at a P/E of 32.1x. This is at the 56th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Targa Resources Corp.'s current dividend yield is 1.39% with a payout ratio of 44.4%.
Targa Resources Corp. has 26.5% gross margin and 20.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Targa Resources Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.