Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.3x · EV/EBITDA 11.7x · ROE 7.2%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.0B | $2.7B | $3.4B | $3.5B | $1.9B | $3.2B | $2.2B | $2.2B | $1.6B | $2.8B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.3B | $3.0B | $3.6B | $4.1B | $2.5B | $4.2B | $3.3B | $3.5B | $2.8B | $4.0B | $3.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.26 | 11.57 | 7.51 | 10.26 | 3.36 | 6.77 | 7.95 | 10.60 | 6.04 | 14.81 | 9.49 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.15 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.95 | 0.44 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.50 | 0.99 | 0.77 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.22 | 0.82 | 1.03 | 1.17 | 0.68 | 1.30 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.79 | 1.44 | 1.00 |
| P/FCF | 31.10 | 21.05 | 5.12 | 20.77 | 4.83 | 8.21 | 3.97 | 7.71 | 5.84 | 28.05 | — |
| P/OCF | 24.76 | 16.76 | 4.94 | 18.07 | 4.35 | 7.63 | 3.81 | 6.97 | 5.24 | 27.33 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.87 | 0.79 | 1.11 | 0.57 | 1.04 | 1.00 | 1.12 | 0.85 | 1.41 | 1.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.66 | 8.16 | 5.83 | 8.79 | 3.10 | 6.27 | 8.07 | 12.22 | 7.20 | 11.38 | 10.06 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.71 | 9.01 | 5.79 | 8.82 | 3.23 | 6.65 | 8.77 | 12.78 | 7.63 | 11.68 | 10.01 |
| EV / FCF | — | 23.39 | 5.31 | 24.26 | 6.24 | 10.76 | 5.80 | 12.12 | 9.90 | 40.05 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | 22.0% | 23.4% | 22.7% | 26.8% | 25.3% | 22.2% | 19.7% | 21.3% | 22.0% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 9.7% | 12.9% | 11.9% | 17.9% | 15.8% | 11.5% | 8.3% | 10.9% | 12.3% | 12.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.9% | 6.9% | 10.2% | 9.3% | 13.2% | 11.8% | 8.7% | 6.7% | 8.3% | 6.7% | 8.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.2% | 7.2% | 14.4% | 11.8% | 21.8% | 20.1% | 12.8% | 9.8% | 13.5% | 9.9% | 11.0% |
| ROA | 4.8% | 4.8% | 9.3% | 7.1% | 12.7% | 11.2% | 7.2% | 5.4% | 7.0% | 5.1% | 5.8% |
| ROIC | 7.2% | 7.2% | 12.3% | 9.5% | 17.1% | 14.1% | 8.4% | 5.8% | 8.4% | 8.4% | 7.9% |
| ROCE | 7.4% | 7.4% | 12.6% | 9.7% | 18.3% | 15.9% | 10.0% | 7.1% | 10.3% | 10.4% | 9.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.48 | 3.48 | 1.80 | 3.12 | 1.80 | 2.51 | 4.08 | 5.61 | 3.68 | 4.22 | 4.60 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.63 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.21 | 1.26 | 0.70 | 1.48 | 2.55 | 4.45 | 2.95 | 3.41 | 3.90 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.34 | 0.19 | 3.49 | 1.41 | 2.55 | 1.83 | 4.41 | 4.06 | 12.00 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 12.68 | 12.68 | 9.90 | 20.94 | 13.45 | 15.84 | 18.74 | 22.94 | 8.51 | 8.70 | 9.58 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.54 | 3.54 | 2.72 | 5.20 | 3.37 | 3.32 | 3.63 | 2.78 | 0.79 | 1.01 | 0.87 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.83 | 2.83 | 2.21 | 4.10 | 2.83 | 2.79 | 3.23 | 2.16 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.69 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.85 | 0.85 | 1.09 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.64 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 15.49 | 9.07 | 22.07 | 14.22 | 10.72 | 7.11 | 8.20 | 5.77 | 16.31 | 12.52 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.8% | 8.6% | 13.3% | 9.7% | 29.8% | 14.8% | 12.6% | 9.4% | 16.6% | 6.8% | 10.5% |
| FCF Yield | 3.2% | 4.7% | 19.5% | 4.8% | 20.7% | 12.2% | 25.2% | 13.0% | 17.1% | 3.6% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 6.9% | 10.2% | 4.3% | 4.9% | 10.5% | 8.7% | 11.2% | 4.1% | 9.0% | 4.1% | 2.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.9% | 10.2% | 4.3% | 4.9% | 10.5% | 8.7% | 11.2% | 4.1% | 9.0% | 4.1% | 2.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $86M | $95M | $100M | $104M | $114M | $130M | $141M | $149M | $155M | $161M |
Cyclical Margin Compression
Based on current market data, TPH trades at a forward P/E of 24.51, which appears elevated relative to its historical averages and peer group, suggesting that investors are pricing in a recovery that may not align with the company's recent 22.75% revenue contraction.
The disconnect between the forward P/E and the current earnings trajectory warrants caution, as the market may be overestimating the speed of a margin rebound. Compared to peers like Taylor Morrison, the premium valuation implies an expectation of superior asset quality or land-bank scarcity that has yet to manifest in recent bottom-line performance.
As reported in recent financial statements, TPH's ROIC has deteriorated significantly to 0.1% in 2026Q1, down from 3.7% in 2023Q4, indicating that the company is struggling to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital during this period of reduced closing velocity.
This sharp decline in ROIC reflects the dual impact of margin compression and the inefficient utilization of a large land bank that is currently failing to turn over. Investors should monitor whether this decay is a structural shift in the business model or a temporary consequence of the current high-interest-rate environment.
According to quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has ballooned to 702 days in 2026Q1, a dramatic increase from 327 days in 2023Q4, highlighting a significant slowdown in inventory turnover that is tying up capital in unsold homes and land.
The extended DIO (Days Inventory Outstanding) suggests that the company's move-up product is facing absorption hurdles, forcing a longer holding period for assets. This inefficiency directly impairs the company's ability to recycle cash into new, higher-margin projects, thereby limiting overall operational flexibility.
Based on reported figures, TPH maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.39, which remains among the most conservative in the sector, providing a necessary financial cushion as the company navigates a period of significant revenue volatility and margin pressure.
While this low leverage profile limits the risk of insolvency, it also suggests that the company is not utilizing debt to amplify returns during the cycle. This defensive posture appears appropriate given the current market uncertainty, though it may limit the company's ability to aggressively acquire land at distressed prices.
The Price-to-Book ratio is frequently misapplied to TPH, as it fails to account for the significant gap between the historical cost basis of the company's land bank and the current market value of those assets in high-barrier coastal regions.
Relying on P/B obscures the potential embedded value within the land portfolio, which may be significantly higher than the accounting book value suggests. Analysts should instead focus on a NAV (Net Asset Value) approach that adjusts for the current market pricing of entitled land to better capture the company's true intrinsic worth.
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TPH stock.
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 17.3x. The historical average is 12.7x. This places it at the 85th percentile of its historical range.
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 11.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.2x.
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.2%. The historical average is 10.4%.
Based on historical data, Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 17.3x. This is at the 85th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. has 22.0% gross margin and 9.7% operating margin.
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.