Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 28.2x · EV/EBITDA 17.4x · ROE 20.7%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.7B | $2.0B | $1.2B | $539M | $391M | $846M | $879M | $573M | $540M | $412M | $221M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.8B | $2.1B | $1.4B | $799M | $705M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $775M | $757M | $612M | $436M |
| P/E Ratio → | 28.17 | 34.86 | 28.08 | 13.09 | 33.80 | 14.99 | 26.68 | 41.45 | 21.27 | 20.32 | 8.22 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.66 | 4.38 | 3.23 | 1.66 | 1.22 | 1.90 | 2.17 | 1.58 | 1.62 | 1.44 | 1.07 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.41 | 5.46 | 6.11 | 3.54 | 3.44 | 6.32 | 7.48 | 5.38 | 6.53 | 7.73 | 6.48 |
| P/FCF | 38.70 | 46.31 | 18.64 | 8.81 | 17.29 | 13.63 | 23.42 | 17.38 | 49.87 | 14.90 | 37.27 |
| P/OCF | 29.57 | 35.39 | 17.35 | 8.05 | 12.90 | 12.40 | 20.13 | 15.16 | 41.23 | 13.89 | 24.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.57 | 3.82 | 2.46 | 2.19 | 2.58 | 2.89 | 2.14 | 2.28 | 2.14 | 2.11 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.35 | 20.60 | 14.93 | 9.48 | 8.53 | 12.04 | 16.86 | 24.75 | 14.67 | 11.80 | 9.72 |
| EV / EBIT | 18.70 | 19.50 | 15.60 | 9.45 | 8.89 | 12.26 | 17.47 | 14.66 | 16.32 | 13.96 | 10.47 |
| EV / FCF | — | 48.27 | 22.08 | 13.06 | 31.19 | 18.49 | 31.19 | 23.51 | 69.95 | 22.11 | 73.64 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.1% | 57.1% | 55.9% | 56.3% | 55.4% | 48.9% | 46.9% | 44.2% | 42.9% | 43.7% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | 20.6% | 24.0% | 24.7% | 24.7% | 20.3% | 15.9% | 7.5% | 14.6% | 17.3% | 21.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.6% | 12.6% | 11.0% | 11.8% | 3.6% | 11.7% | 9.4% | 4.5% | 7.6% | 7.1% | 13.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 20.7% | 20.7% | 23.3% | 29.0% | 9.4% | 41.4% | 34.1% | 17.2% | 37.2% | 46.3% | 79.0% |
| ROA | 9.3% | 9.3% | 7.5% | 6.7% | 2.0% | 9.5% | 8.1% | 4.1% | 8.1% | 7.1% | 10.1% |
| ROIC | 16.6% | 16.6% | 15.9% | 14.3% | 13.8% | 16.0% | 13.5% | 6.7% | 13.2% | 14.8% | 14.2% |
| ROCE | 16.8% | 16.8% | 18.9% | 16.0% | 14.5% | 18.1% | 15.5% | 8.2% | 18.7% | 20.3% | 18.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.83 | 0.83 | 1.37 | 2.49 | 3.71 | 3.22 | 2.84 | 2.79 | 2.67 | 3.79 | 6.41 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.01 | 3.01 | 2.83 | 4.48 | 5.09 | 4.52 | 4.80 | 9.50 | 4.28 | 3.90 | 4.86 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.23 | 1.13 | 1.71 | 2.77 | 2.26 | 2.48 | 1.90 | 2.63 | 3.74 | 6.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.84 | 0.84 | 2.33 | 3.09 | 3.80 | 3.17 | 4.20 | 6.46 | 4.21 | 3.85 | 4.80 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.97 | 3.45 | 4.25 | 13.90 | 4.87 | 7.77 | 6.13 | 20.09 | 7.21 | 36.37 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.28 | 4.28 | 6.32 | 5.77 | 4.06 | 4.56 | 4.97 | 3.66 | 3.08 | 2.59 | 1.56 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.56 | 5.56 | 4.42 | 2.67 | 6.23 | 6.18 | 2.89 | 3.39 | 1.75 | 2.08 | 1.90 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.12 | 4.12 | 2.27 | 1.62 | 3.33 | 4.01 | 1.37 | 2.12 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.40 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.97 | 2.97 | 1.03 | 1.17 | 2.57 | 3.18 | 0.74 | 1.70 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.98 | 1.01 | 0.72 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.65 | 1.36 | 1.20 | 2.60 | 2.51 | 2.84 | 2.08 | 2.54 | 1.70 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 20.28 | 25.10 | 32.75 | 9.52 | 5.32 | 8.41 | 6.96 | 2.87 | 4.15 | 3.86 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.2% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 9.5% | 9.5% | 12.3% | 11.7% | 36.5% | 7.9% | 10.0% | 21.8% | 9.2% | 3.8% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.5% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 7.6% | 3.0% | 6.7% | 3.7% | 2.4% | 4.7% | 4.9% | 12.2% |
| FCF Yield | 2.6% | 2.2% | 5.4% | 11.4% | 5.8% | 7.3% | 4.3% | 5.8% | 2.0% | 6.7% | 2.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 7.5% | 4.6% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.3% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 8.6% | 5.1% | 1.6% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $19M | $19M | $20M | $18M | $22M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $18M |
Regulatory and PMTA uncertainty
According to current market data, TPB trades at a forward P/E of 60.85, which significantly exceeds the valuation of legacy tobacco peers, suggesting that investors are pricing in aggressive growth expectations for the Zig-Zag brand's expansion into the broader cannabis-ancillary market rather than traditional tobacco earnings.
The elevated P/E ratio relative to the sector average implies that the market is decoupling TPB from the secular decline of traditional tobacco. However, the PEG ratio of 2.11 warrants caution, as it suggests the current valuation may be overextended if the company fails to maintain its recent 28.39% revenue growth trajectory.
Based on reported financial statements, TPB's ROIC has remained in a narrow range between 2.0% and 4.8% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company is struggling to generate high returns on its invested capital despite the high-margin nature of its core Zig-Zag and Stoker's segments.
The persistent gap between gross margins and ROIC suggests that significant capital is tied up in non-performing assets or regulatory-heavy segments like NewGen. Investors should monitor whether management can improve capital allocation efficiency or if the current return profile is a structural limitation of the company's acquisition-led growth strategy.
As reported in recent filings, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 165 days in 2026Q1, primarily driven by an elevated days inventory outstanding (DIO) of 191 days, which highlights potential challenges in managing inventory levels across the diverse Zig-Zag and NewGen product portfolios.
The high DIO relative to historical norms suggests that the company may be carrying excess stock, potentially to mitigate supply chain risks or as a result of channel loading. This inefficiency ties up cash that could otherwise be deployed for debt reduction or strategic investments, warranting further investigation into inventory turnover trends.
Based on the latest balance sheet data, TPB maintains a current ratio of 5.87, which provides a substantial liquidity cushion that appears designed to insulate the company from the cash flow volatility inherent in its regulatory-sensitive NewGen segment and the cyclical nature of wholesale inventory management.
While the high current ratio indicates a strong short-term position, it also suggests that a significant portion of assets may be trapped in working capital rather than being deployed for growth. This liquidity profile appears adequate to weather potential regulatory shocks, though it may signal an overly conservative approach to cash management.
Investors frequently misapply traditional tobacco valuation metrics like dividend yield and P/E to TPB, failing to account for the company's role as a high-growth, asset-light brand licensor, which obscures the true value of its Zig-Zag brand in the evolving legal cannabis consumption market.
Using legacy tobacco benchmarks ignores the growth potential of the Zig-Zag brand and the specific value-oriented positioning of Stoker's. Analysts should instead focus on brand-licensing revenue growth and adjusted EBITDA margins to better capture the company's underlying earning power and competitive moat.
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TPB stock.
Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 28.2x. The historical average is 24.3x. This places it at the 70th percentile of its historical range.
Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 17.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.3x.
Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 20.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 33.8%.
Based on historical data, Turning Point Brands, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 28.2x. This is at the 70th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.34% with a payout ratio of 9.5%.
Turning Point Brands, Inc. has 57.1% gross margin and 20.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.