Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 6.9x · EV/EBITDA 5.4x · ROE 18.5%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.4B | $1.9B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.1B | $369M | $373M | $809M | $249M | $262M | $385M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.6B | $1.1B | $931M | $1.6B | $1.5B | $973M | $893M | $1.8B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 6.86 | 5.29 | 3.43 | 3.32 | 4.61 | — | 4.28 | 38.05 | — | — | 5.65 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.52 | 1.95 | 1.12 | 1.17 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.42 | 0.86 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.73 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 1.11 | 0.99 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.82 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.41 |
| P/FCF | 21.32 | 16.49 | 3.48 | 2.80 | 5.94 | — | 1.13 | 7.63 | — | 3.50 | 1.92 |
| P/OCF | 7.85 | 6.07 | 2.93 | 2.76 | 5.47 | — | 1.07 | 6.87 | — | 3.29 | 1.83 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.14 | 0.76 | 1.06 | 1.23 | 1.79 | 1.01 | 1.87 | 1.73 | 3.00 | 2.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.39 | 3.59 | 1.97 | 2.42 | 4.00 | — | 3.45 | 7.12 | 10.38 | 12.68 | 6.56 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.56 | 5.03 | 2.26 | 2.79 | 5.31 | — | 4.21 | 13.91 | 84.09 | — | 12.81 |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.60 | 2.35 | 2.53 | 8.17 | — | 2.69 | 16.63 | — | 17.25 | 6.23 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 27.5% | 32.1% | 39.5% | 26.0% | -10.7% | 28.4% | 17.6% | 6.4% | 11.0% | 23.8% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 22.6% | 30.9% | 37.1% | 22.4% | -35.8% | 16.0% | 13.1% | 1.0% | 0.3% | 16.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 36.9% | 36.9% | 32.8% | 35.3% | 20.0% | -44.7% | 9.9% | 4.4% | -7.0% | -13.5% | 11.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.5% | 18.5% | 24.4% | 39.7% | 24.7% | -25.3% | 8.4% | 4.3% | -5.4% | -6.0% | 6.9% |
| ROA | 16.7% | 16.7% | 20.6% | 27.9% | 13.8% | -14.0% | 4.3% | 1.9% | -2.4% | -2.8% | 3.1% |
| ROIC | 12.5% | 12.5% | 21.2% | 28.8% | 13.6% | -9.6% | 6.0% | 4.7% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 3.5% |
| ROCE | 10.9% | 10.9% | 21.0% | 32.3% | 17.2% | -12.5% | 7.9% | 6.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 4.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.54 | 0.78 | 0.57 | 1.05 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 1.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 1.59 | — | 2.38 | 4.21 | 8.83 | 10.81 | 4.90 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.38 | -0.26 | -0.11 | 0.37 | 0.72 | 0.48 | 0.96 | 1.11 | 1.02 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.57 | -2.57 | -0.95 | -0.26 | 1.09 | — | 2.01 | 3.85 | 8.40 | 10.11 | 4.54 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -6.89 | -1.13 | -0.27 | 2.23 | — | 1.57 | 9.01 | — | 13.75 | 4.31 |
| Interest Coverage | 74.24 | 74.24 | 55.08 | 20.21 | 7.65 | -5.97 | 4.12 | 1.94 | 0.26 | -0.04 | 3.28 |
Net cash position: cash ($831M) exceeds total debt ($55M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 7.98 | 7.98 | 5.66 | 3.97 | 2.70 | 1.56 | 1.24 | 1.49 | 1.14 | 0.75 | 0.91 |
| Quick Ratio | 7.76 | 7.76 | 5.32 | 3.65 | 2.34 | 1.25 | 1.07 | 1.32 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.91 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.31 | 6.31 | 4.05 | 2.33 | 1.06 | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.29 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.42 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.27 |
| Inventory Turnover | 23.47 | 23.47 | 18.16 | 16.76 | 14.33 | 12.25 | 18.35 | 15.63 | 18.08 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 58.65 | 43.13 | 48.19 | 62.63 | 60.44 | 28.03 | 78.58 | 63.52 | 71.06 | 40.45 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.9% | 3.7% | 7.4% | 3.4% | — | — | — | — | 3.2% | 7.9% | 12.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 19.6% | 19.6% | 25.5% | 11.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 74.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 14.6% | 18.9% | 29.2% | 30.1% | 21.7% | — | 23.3% | 2.6% | — | — | 17.7% |
| FCF Yield | 4.7% | 6.1% | 28.7% | 35.7% | 16.8% | — | 88.9% | 13.1% | — | 28.6% | 52.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.9% | 3.7% | 7.4% | 3.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.2% | 7.9% | 16.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $35M | $35M | $35M | $34M | $34M | $34M | $34M | $34M | $23M | $21M |
Fleet renewal capital intensity
According to current market data, TNK trades at a forward P/E of 4.61x, which appears significantly discounted compared to the broader industrial sector and suggests that investors are pricing in a sharp mean reversion in tanker rates rather than sustained operational outperformance.
The low valuation multiples relative to historical averages indicate that the market remains wary of the sustainability of current spot rate environments. While the PEG ratio of 0.21 implies an attractive entry point for growth-oriented investors, this valuation likely reflects the inherent cyclicality of the marine shipping industry and the potential for future earnings volatility.
Based on recent financial statements, TNK's ROIC has fluctuated between 2.7% and 7.9% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company struggles to consistently compound returns on its aging asset base despite periods of high profitability in the spot market.
The volatility in ROIC suggests that the company's ability to generate returns is highly dependent on external rate environments rather than internal operational efficiencies. Investors should monitor whether management can improve these returns through strategic fleet renewal, as current levels may not sufficiently compensate for the capital intensity of the business.
As reported in quarterly filings, TNK's cash conversion cycle has shown significant variability, swinging from a negative 3 days in 2026Q1 to a high of 67 days in 2024Q3, reflecting the unpredictable nature of voyage completions and the resulting impact on short-term liquidity.
The fluctuation in the cash conversion cycle highlights the operational challenges of managing a global tanker fleet where voyage durations and port turnaround times are subject to external disruptions. This inconsistency in working capital management warrants further investigation into the company's ability to maintain stable cash flows during periods of market stress.
Based on the latest quarterly data, TNK maintains a current ratio of 9.40 as of 2026Q1, which, when combined with a near-zero debt-to-equity ratio, provides an exceptional liquidity buffer that is structurally superior to most peers in the marine shipping industry.
This liquidity position suggests that the company is well-positioned to navigate prolonged industry downturns without the need for external financing. The substantial cash reserves appear to be a deliberate strategy to mitigate the risks associated with the cyclical nature of the tanker market and the upcoming capital requirements for fleet modernization.
As noted in industry research, the P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to TNK, as it fails to account for the significant non-cash depreciation and potential asset impairment reversals that can distort earnings in a capital-intensive business model focused on long-lived maritime assets.
Investors should prioritize Price-to-Net Asset Value (P/NAV) over P/E multiples, as the latter obscures the underlying value of the fleet and the impact of cyclical rate fluctuations on reported net income. Relying on P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's true earning power and its ability to sustain shareholder value through the shipping cycle.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TNK stock.
Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 6.9x. The historical average is 10.2x. This places it at the 69th percentile of its historical range.
Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.3x.
Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 18.5%. The historical average is 11.9%.
Based on historical data, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 6.9x. This is at the 69th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s current dividend yield is 2.86% with a payout ratio of 19.6%.
Teekay Tankers Ltd. has 27.5% gross margin and 22.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.