Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.4x · EV/EBITDA 8.2x · ROE -337.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $76M | $64M | $56M | $29M | $22M | $37M | $334M | $484M | $440M | $445M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $408M | $395M | $389M | $349M | $302M | $451M | $691M | $802M | $779M | $806M | $1.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.92 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.73 | 2.32 | 32.31 | 0.63 | 0.19 | 0.72 | 1.56 | 1.11 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 2.06 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 4.22 | — | — | — | 10.18 | 16.24 | 29.94 | — | 32.67 |
| P/OCF | — | — | 2.47 | — | — | — | 6.33 | 8.23 | 10.51 | — | 13.86 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.57 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 1.19 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.21 | 7.96 | 8.38 | 14.19 | — | — | — | 17.11 | 30.08 | — | 31.25 |
| EV / EBIT | 26.22 | 25.42 | 36.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 29.25 | — | — | — | 21.08 | 26.93 | 53.01 | — | 42.17 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 23.4% | 26.2% | 24.5% | 24.0% | 21.6% | 28.0% | 28.2% | 26.3% | 25.8% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.2% | -1.5% | -4.7% | -16.0% | -25.5% | -0.2% | -3.1% | -9.6% | -0.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -5.5% | -5.5% | -4.5% | -8.8% | 8.3% | -23.4% | -27.8% | -2.8% | -5.2% | -8.7% | -1.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -337.0% | -337.0% | -161.7% | -92.7% | 82.6% | -139.6% | -72.8% | -7.3% | -14.2% | -21.0% | -3.2% |
| ROA | -9.7% | -9.7% | -7.0% | -12.8% | 10.6% | -25.9% | -27.6% | -3.3% | -6.4% | -9.5% | -1.3% |
| ROIC | 3.4% | 3.4% | 2.2% | -2.6% | -6.9% | -18.3% | -24.6% | -0.2% | -3.6% | -10.3% | -0.4% |
| ROCE | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.7% | -4.8% | -11.6% | -22.7% | -30.3% | -0.3% | -4.5% | -12.1% | -0.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 12.73 | 12.73 | 212.04 | 7.80 | 2.88 | 9.04 | 1.78 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.68 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.04 | 7.04 | 7.94 | 14.46 | — | — | — | 7.05 | 13.80 | — | 8.05 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 12.07 | 191.59 | 7.02 | 2.38 | 7.98 | 1.67 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.60 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.68 | 6.68 | 7.17 | 13.02 | — | — | — | 6.79 | 13.09 | — | 7.04 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 25.03 | — | — | — | 10.90 | 10.68 | 23.08 | — | 9.50 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.22 | -0.23 | -0.46 | -1.64 | -0.74 | -0.02 | -2.05 | -5.40 | -0.24 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.22 | 2.22 | 1.78 | 1.84 | 0.77 | 2.14 | 2.13 | 2.11 | 2.54 | 2.69 | 2.72 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.56 | 1.62 | 0.69 | 1.95 | 1.86 | 1.85 | 2.19 | 2.35 | 2.38 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.85 | 1.61 | 1.52 | 1.36 | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.28 | 1.14 | 1.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | 16.59 | 16.59 | 16.61 | 16.77 | 17.58 | 17.60 | 16.66 | 21.32 | 18.93 | 17.91 | 17.51 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 76.92 | 73.94 | 93.44 | 98.38 | 97.23 | 85.96 | 77.16 | 78.65 | 92.10 | 80.30 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 23.7% | — | — | — | 9.8% | 6.2% | 3.3% | — | 3.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $5M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M |
Excessive debt leverage
According to current market data, TISI trades at a P/S multiple of 0.09, which, when compared to the broader industrial services sector, suggests that investors are pricing the equity as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented business with sustainable long-term earnings potential.
The negative P/E of -1.44 confirms that the market is currently discounting the firm's inability to generate positive net income. This valuation level implies that the market expects significant equity dilution or restructuring, as the current enterprise value is heavily dominated by debt obligations rather than future cash flow generation.
As reported in financial statements, TISI's ROIC has fluctuated between -1.8% and 2.5% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company is failing to generate returns on invested capital that exceed its cost of capital, thereby destroying shareholder value over the observed period.
The inability to maintain a positive ROIC suggests that the company's core mechanical services and inspection segments are not achieving the necessary pricing power to offset their high labor intensity. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward higher-margin robotics and software services to reverse this multi-year trend of capital decay.
Based on recent SEC filings, TISI's cash conversion cycle has remained volatile, peaking at 102 days in 2024Q1, which highlights significant inefficiencies in managing receivables and payables compared to more streamlined peers in the specialty business services industry.
The high DSO, which frequently exceeds 80 days, suggests that the company lacks leverage over its large industrial clients, forcing it to carry significant unbilled receivables on its balance sheet. This working capital drag exacerbates the firm's liquidity constraints, as cash remains tied up in project-based milestones rather than supporting operational flexibility.
As indicated by the latest quarterly data, TISI's debt-to-equity ratio has surged to 23.19, a level that appears unsustainable and significantly higher than industry averages, suggesting that the company's financial structure is highly vulnerable to even minor shifts in interest rates or operational cash flow.
The interest coverage ratio, which has frequently dipped into negative territory, indicates that the company is struggling to service its debt from core operations. This leverage profile limits the firm's ability to invest in the high-margin Quest Integrity segment, effectively trapping the company in a cycle of debt-funded survival.
The EV/EBITDA ratio of 8.23 is frequently misapplied to TISI, as it masks the company's severe interest burden and the reality that a significant portion of reported EBITDA is consumed by mandatory debt service and necessary capital expenditures to maintain aging industrial infrastructure.
Investors should prioritize free cash flow and interest coverage ratios over EBITDA, as the latter ignores the massive debt-to-equity imbalance that threatens the company's going-concern status. Relying on EBITDA multiples in this context provides a misleading sense of operational health that ignores the firm's actual cash-generating capacity.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TISI stock.
Team, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.4x. The historical average is 27.8x.
Team, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.5x.
Team, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -337.0%. The historical average is -19.5%.
Based on historical data, Team, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Team, Inc. has 23.4% gross margin and 1.7% operating margin.
Team, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.