Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -106.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -8.2%. (2002–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $499M | $387M | $91M | $114M | $83M | $143M | $262M | $101M | $95M | $70M | $64M |
| Enterprise Value | $498M | $385M | $90M | $113M | $78M | $135M | $249M | $94M | $84M | $68M | $41M |
| P/E Ratio → | -106.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 8.88 | 6.86 | 1.61 | 2.00 | 1.38 | 2.28 | 3.85 | 1.63 | 1.45 | 1.22 | 1.01 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 5338.04 | 7015.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -8.2% | -8.2% | -6.0% | -5.8% | -5.0% | -9.1% | -7.1% | -6.4% | -6.9% | -10.7% | -13.0% |
| ROA | -8.2% | -8.2% | -6.0% | -5.8% | -4.9% | -9.1% | -7.1% | -6.3% | -6.8% | -9.5% | -10.3% |
| ROIC | -6.2% | -6.2% | -4.8% | -4.4% | -4.4% | -7.7% | -5.7% | -4.7% | -6.3% | -9.2% | -10.8% |
| ROCE | -8.0% | -8.0% | -6.3% | -5.6% | -5.3% | -8.6% | -6.4% | -5.4% | -7.6% | -9.8% | -9.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.02 | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.08 | -0.12 | -0.19 | -0.11 | -0.16 | -0.04 | -0.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -58.91 | -105.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | -1.09 | — | — | — | -39.20 | -243.23 | -406.18 |
Net cash position: cash ($1M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 10.37 | 10.37 | 6.41 | 8.48 | 17.34 | 13.66 | 26.80 | 21.37 | 19.04 | 5.65 | 1.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 10.37 | 10.37 | 6.41 | 8.48 | 17.34 | 13.66 | 26.80 | 21.37 | 19.04 | 5.65 | 1.50 |
| Cash Ratio | 9.27 | 9.27 | 5.59 | 7.18 | 16.81 | 13.42 | 26.47 | 20.66 | 18.67 | 5.23 | 1.49 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $208M | $200M | $196M | $195M | $195M | $190M | $187M | $182M | $162M | $117M |
Persistent equity dilution risk
As reported in recent financial statements, THM trades at a price-to-book ratio of 7.96, a metric that appears disconnected from the company's lack of revenue and the inherent uncertainty surrounding the eventual economic viability of the Livengood Gold Project's low-grade mineral resource.
The elevated P/B ratio suggests that investors are pricing the company based on the potential optionality of its gold reserves rather than any tangible book value. This valuation warrants caution, as the lack of earnings or cash flow makes traditional multiples like P/E or EV/EBITDA effectively meaningless for assessing the firm's intrinsic worth.
Based on historical data, THM has consistently generated negative returns on invested capital, with ROIC figures fluctuating between -0.1% and -2.4% over the last ten quarters, reflecting the ongoing erosion of capital deployed into non-productive exploration and administrative activities.
The persistent inability to generate a positive return on capital highlights the fundamental challenge of a pre-revenue mining firm that must fund its existence through equity dilution. Investors should monitor whether future technical milestones can shift these returns toward positive territory, though current trends suggest continued capital destruction.
According to recent SEC filings, THM's current ratio reached 535.92 in 2026Q1, a figure that is heavily skewed by recent capital raises and does not reflect operational liquidity, as the company remains entirely reliant on external financing to sustain its ongoing regulatory and administrative project maintenance.
While the high current ratio suggests a temporary buffer against immediate insolvency, it masks the reality that the company has no internal cash-generating engine. The liquidity position is essentially a countdown clock until the next required equity issuance to fund the project's development and holding costs.
As indicated by financial filings, the debt-to-equity ratio is frequently misapplied to THM, as it suggests a healthy balance sheet due to the absence of debt, while ignoring the reality that equity issuance is the primary, highly dilutive financing mechanism for the firm.
Analysts should prioritize monitoring the dilution rate and the 'burn rate' of cash reserves rather than traditional leverage ratios. Using debt-based metrics for a pre-revenue explorer obscures the true cost of capital and the significant risk of shareholder value erosion inherent in the current business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 24 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying THM stock.
International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -106.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -8.2%. The historical average is -17.1%.
Based on historical data, International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -106.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.