Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 47.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 4.8%. (2024–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $266M | $194M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $266M | $195M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 47.14 | 46.14 | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.80 | 0.79 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.8% | 4.8% | — |
| ROA | 4.6% | 4.6% | -90.3% |
| ROIC | -1.0% | -1.0% | — |
| ROCE | -1.3% | -1.3% | -159.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.00 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 1.01 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 1.01 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.59 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.1% | 2.2% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $19M | $30M |
Imminent liquidation and delisting
According to recent financial data, SOUL trades at a P/B of 0.80, yet this valuation metric appears largely disconnected from the entity's underlying economic reality as a non-operating shell company facing severe liquidity constraints and a lack of viable acquisition targets to justify its public listing.
The P/B ratio of 0.80 suggests the market is pricing the entity at a discount to its book value, which is common for distressed SPACs where the trust account has been depleted. Investors should monitor whether this discount reflects a realistic assessment of the shell's limited utility or if it ignores the potential for total equity erosion should the entity fail to secure a merger.
Based on reported figures, the current ratio has deteriorated to 0.75 as of 2026Q1, signaling that the entity's ability to cover its immediate administrative obligations is increasingly compromised compared to the more stable liquidity positions observed in previous fiscal periods.
The decline in the current ratio below unity indicates that current liabilities now exceed available current assets, leaving the entity with virtually no margin for error. This trend suggests that the company may be forced to rely on external capital injections or sponsor support simply to maintain its regulatory standing, which warrants further investigation by stakeholders.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the entity's D/E ratio has shifted from 0.00 in 2025Q4 to 0.01 in 2026Q1, reflecting an increasing reliance on debt financing to sustain operations in the absence of any meaningful revenue generation or cash inflows from business combinations.
While the absolute debt level remains low, the emergence of leverage in a shell vehicle is a negative indicator of financial health. It suggests that the sponsors are likely funding the entity's ongoing administrative burn through loans, which may create complex repayment obligations that further complicate any future merger negotiations.
Financial analysts frequently misapply the Price-to-Book ratio to SOUL, as this metric fails to account for the fact that the entity's book value is largely composed of non-liquid assets rather than the cash-in-trust required to facilitate a successful business combination or provide operational runway.
The P/B ratio is fundamentally flawed for a SPAC because it treats all assets as equally valuable, ignoring the critical distinction between restricted trust funds and usable working capital. Investors should instead focus on the cash-to-burn rate and the remaining time to the extension deadline, as these metrics provide a more accurate assessment of the entity's survival probability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 2 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SOUL stock.
Soulpower Acquisition Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 47.1x. The historical average is 46.1x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Soulpower Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.8%. The historical average is 4.8%.
Based on historical data, Soulpower Acquisition Corp. is trading at a P/E of 47.1x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.