Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -22.7%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2M | $2M | $21M | $5.4B | $168M | $1.7B | $5.4B | $1.6B | $5.0B | $21.0B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-1532116 | $-982326 | $-216725968 | $5.1B | $-90583030 | $1.4B | $5.4B | $1.6B | $5.0B | $20.9B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | 12471.91 | 22.32 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 58.04 | 0.65 | 5.88 | 107.93 | 33.72 | 66.10 | 226.83 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 12.70 | 0.41 | 2.70 | 90.10 | 323.63 | 5439.21 | 356.45 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 552.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | 552.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.01 | -0.94 | 55.02 | -0.35 | 4.73 | 107.92 | 33.42 | 65.70 | 225.80 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | 5280.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 928.08 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 523.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 1.5% | 1.5% | 3.0% | 15.3% | -4.1% | 7.2% | 25.8% | 69.1% | 74.6% | 79.8% | 73.7% |
| Operating Margin | -63.9% | -63.9% | -9.3% | -5.2% | -82.5% | -14.8% | -3.8% | -11.4% | -87.4% | -39.4% | -57.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -63.1% | -63.1% | -5.9% | -4.0% | -88.2% | -16.9% | 8.8% | 3.0% | -88.2% | -39.5% | -58.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -22.7% | -22.7% | -3.2% | -0.9% | -44.0% | -14.2% | 13.5% | 49.1% | -221.9% | -100.3% | -238.2% |
| ROA | -20.5% | -20.5% | -2.8% | -0.8% | -39.9% | -12.9% | 6.3% | 1.8% | -56.9% | -37.4% | -52.7% |
| ROIC | -23.9% | -23.9% | -9.5% | -2.5% | -71.7% | -18.0% | -5.6% | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -23.0% | -23.0% | -5.0% | -1.2% | -41.1% | -12.3% | -5.4% | -82.9% | -177.9% | -88.9% | -169.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 3.27 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.01 | -0.55 | -0.66 | -0.63 | -0.53 | -0.00 | -2.93 | -32.75 | -1.61 | -1.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | -289.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -28.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.12 | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($3M) exceeds total debt ($2000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 11.05 | 11.05 | 9.97 | 7.40 | 9.68 | 11.09 | 9.59 | 1.05 | 0.99 | 1.71 | 0.87 |
| Quick Ratio | 10.48 | 10.48 | 9.26 | 6.87 | 8.66 | 9.49 | 9.59 | 1.05 | 0.99 | 1.71 | 0.87 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 5.09 | 4.54 | 5.69 | 5.65 | 0.55 | 0.25 | 0.37 | 1.36 | 0.43 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.19 | 0.57 | 0.42 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.34 | 6.34 | 6.80 | 2.38 | 5.85 | 3.51 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 839.57 | — | 10.70 | — | 73.11 | 123.70 | 64.50 | 29.07 | 4.26 | 7.41 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 4.5% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 0.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $3M | $67M | $4M | $3M | $5M | $593233 | $651994 | $490542 | $632022 |
Operational insolvency and dilution
Based on reported figures, the company's P/S ratio of 0.01 suggests that the market assigns almost zero value to the underlying business, treating the equity as a speculative option rather than a going concern with meaningful future earnings potential or sustainable growth prospects.
The absence of a meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiple underscores the market's skepticism regarding the company's ability to achieve profitability. Investors appear to be pricing in a high probability of terminal value impairment, as the current valuation is disconnected from traditional software infrastructure metrics.
According to recent financial statements, the company's gross margin of 5.5% in 2025Q4 highlights a fundamental inability to generate value-add, as the cost of revenue consistently consumes nearly all top-line generation, leaving insufficient funds to cover massive operating overheads.
The persistent negative operating margins, reaching -129.2% in the most recent quarter, suggest that the business model is structurally incapable of scaling profitably. This indicates that the company's pivot to crypto-mining has failed to achieve the necessary economies of scale to offset its high fixed-cost base.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, bottoming out at -14.8% in 2025Q4, which indicates that every dollar of capital deployed into the business is actively destroying shareholder value rather than generating a return above the cost of capital.
The inability to achieve positive returns on invested capital suggests that the company's strategic pivots have been poorly executed from a capital allocation perspective. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's assets are being utilized efficiently or if they are simply depreciating without producing commensurate revenue.
Based on the provided data, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated wildly, reaching 268 days in 2025Q4, which suggests significant friction in managing receivables and inventory compared to the more streamlined operations of industry peers in the blockchain infrastructure space.
The high DSO and volatile CCC indicate that the company struggles to collect on its services or manage its inventory effectively, which exacerbates its liquidity constraints. This inefficiency appears to be a structural drag on the company's ability to maintain a stable cash position.
Investors frequently misapply software-as-a-service valuation multiples to this business, which obscures the reality that the company functions more like a distressed commodity producer with high energy-input sensitivity rather than a scalable, high-margin technology platform with recurring revenue streams.
Using P/S or P/E ratios for this entity is misleading because it ignores the underlying commodity-like nature of its mining operations and the declining nature of its legacy data business. A more appropriate approach would be to evaluate the company based on its cost-per-hash and energy-efficiency metrics relative to current Bitcoin prices.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SOS stock.
SOS Limited's current P/E ratio is -0.0x. The historical average is 22.3x.
SOS Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -22.7%. The historical average is -52.9%.
Based on historical data, SOS Limited is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
SOS Limited has 1.5% gross margin and -63.9% operating margin.