Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -9.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -76.2%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $819M | $590M | $326M | $66M | $79M | $79M | $27M | $100M | $203M | $397M | $464M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.5B | $1.3B | $960M | $691M | $734M | $684M | $919M | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | -9.70 | — | — | — | — | 0.75 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.15 | 1.55 | 1.07 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 0.85 | 1.04 |
| P/B Ratio | 13.16 | 10.48 | 2.51 | — | — | — | — | 6.95 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 0.46 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13.60 | 25.41 | — |
| P/OCF | 33.60 | 24.21 | — | 6.14 | — | — | — | 19.11 | 5.50 | 7.15 | 8.88 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.33 | 3.15 | 2.71 | 3.08 | 2.91 | 2.39 | 2.83 | 2.60 | 2.98 | 3.06 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 32.86 | 27.97 | 80.25 | 162.12 | — | 25.53 | 2.60 | 2.98 | 3.06 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 28.28 | 45.26 | — | 4.19 | — | 88.87 | — | 178.17 | 93.62 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 80.10 | 88.87 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -8.0% | -8.0% | 89.1% | 91.7% | 88.5% | 82.6% | 27.2% | 30.5% | 35.9% | 37.8% | 38.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.3% | -15.3% | -4.9% | -5.9% | -12.3% | -14.3% | — | -3.3% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -18.6% | -18.6% | -0.7% | -8.3% | -22.8% | 53.5% | -76.9% | -8.1% | -11.7% | -9.5% | -6.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -76.2% | -76.2% | -6.5% | — | — | — | — | -7.0% | -5.2% | -4.3% | -4.9% |
| ROA | -8.4% | -8.4% | -0.3% | -3.3% | -7.8% | 17.6% | -30.0% | -3.0% | -4.6% | -3.8% | -2.6% |
| ROIC | -5.8% | -5.8% | -1.7% | -2.0% | -3.7% | -4.2% | — | -0.7% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.8% |
| ROCE | -7.7% | -7.7% | -2.3% | -2.8% | -5.0% | -7.2% | — | -1.3% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 1.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 12.26 | 12.26 | 5.03 | — | — | — | — | 82.61 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 0.93 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 22.29 | 25.48 | 73.41 | 162.05 | — | 24.00 | 2.22 | 2.16 | 2.10 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 12.07 | 4.89 | — | — | — | — | 80.94 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.90 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 21.71 | 25.32 | 71.56 | 143.40 | — | 23.51 | 2.15 | 2.12 | 2.02 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 66.50 | 63.46 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.87 | -0.87 | 0.92 | 0.42 | -0.64 | 4.39 | -5.62 | 0.29 | -0.10 | 0.16 | 0.35 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.32 | 0.46 | 0.88 | 0.12 | 0.49 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 1.01 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.32 | 0.46 | 0.88 | 0.12 | 0.49 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.84 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.65 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.37 | 0.20 | 0.42 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.55 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.39 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.65 | 21.73 | 20.60 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 17.82 | 22.75 | 11.46 | 9.36 | 6.19 | 5.53 | 6.65 | 8.40 | 9.62 | 11.16 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.9% | — | 3.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 133.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.4% | 3.9% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $18M | $14M | $7M | $6M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M |
Liquidity and margin insolvency
Based on current market data, Sonida's P/S ratio of 2.05 suggests that investors are pricing the company as a distressed turnaround play rather than a traditional growth entity, especially given the absence of a positive P/E multiple and the ongoing volatility in its reported earnings.
The lack of a meaningful P/E ratio highlights the market's focus on top-line recovery rather than current profitability. Investors should monitor whether the forward EV/EBITDA of 7.86 is achievable, as this multiple implies a significant improvement in operational efficiency that has yet to manifest in the company's quarterly results.
As reported in recent financial statements, Sonida's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -1.4% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its heavy investment in aging senior living facility assets.
The persistent negative ROIC suggests that the returns generated by the company's asset base are insufficient to cover the cost of capital. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current portfolio of facilities can ever achieve the necessary occupancy levels to generate positive returns on invested capital.
According to the provided quarterly data, Sonida's asset turnover ratio of 0.07 in 2026Q1 reflects a low level of operational efficiency, suggesting that the company's massive asset base is not being utilized effectively to drive revenue growth relative to its peers in the healthcare sector.
The low asset turnover, combined with a DSO of 16 days, indicates that while the company collects on its services relatively quickly, the underlying revenue generation per dollar of assets remains weak. This inefficiency appears to be a structural issue tied to the high fixed-cost nature of the senior living business model.
Based on the company's reported figures, the debt-to-equity ratio of 1.82 in 2026Q1, while improved from historical peaks, continues to represent a significant structural burden that limits the company's ability to fund necessary facility upgrades without risking further dilution or liquidity crises.
The negative interest coverage ratio of -2.12 suggests that the company is currently unable to service its debt obligations from operating income alone. This situation appears to leave the company highly vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations and necessitates a close watch on future refinancing activities.
Investors frequently misapply revenue growth as a proxy for business health, yet for Sonida, the 25.24% YoY revenue growth obscures the reality that the company's breakeven occupancy level has risen, rendering top-line expansion insufficient to offset the structural increase in labor and maintenance costs.
The focus on revenue growth often ignores the 'CapEx Trap' inherent in aging facilities, where the cost of maintaining competitive standards often exceeds the incremental margin gained from new residents. Analysts should prioritize 'Revenue Per Occupied Room' and 'Operating Margin' over raw revenue growth to better assess the company's true earning power.
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SNDA stock.
Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -9.7x. The historical average is 24.3x.
Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -76.2%. The historical average is -4.4%.
Based on historical data, Sonida Senior Living, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -9.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sonida Senior Living, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.76%.
Sonida Senior Living, Inc. has -8.0% gross margin and -15.3% operating margin.