Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -17.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -19.5%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.9B | $13.9B | $17.9B | $27.3B | $14.4B | $73.3B | $72.9B | $22.5B | $7.2B | $17.0B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $11.5B | $17.6B | $21.1B | $29.9B | $17.1B | $74.0B | $74.3B | $23.2B | $6.8B | $16.7B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -17.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.33 | 2.34 | 3.33 | 5.93 | 3.13 | 17.81 | 29.08 | 13.09 | 6.07 | 20.65 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.51 | 6.09 | 7.29 | 11.31 | 5.58 | 19.34 | 31.28 | 9.94 | 3.10 | 5.69 | — |
| P/FCF | 18.00 | 31.76 | 81.72 | 784.61 | 260.26 | 328.78 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 11.99 | 21.16 | 43.22 | 110.74 | 77.97 | 250.34 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.96 | 3.93 | 6.48 | 3.73 | 17.96 | 29.66 | 13.51 | 5.74 | 20.27 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 40.15 | 96.35 | 858.32 | 310.02 | 331.64 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | 55.0% | 53.9% | 54.1% | 60.6% | 57.5% | 52.8% | 47.8% | 32.3% | 13.0% | -11.7% |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | -9.0% | -14.7% | -30.4% | -30.3% | -17.1% | -34.4% | -64.3% | -107.5% | -422.5% | -128.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -7.8% | -7.8% | -13.0% | -28.7% | -31.1% | -11.9% | -37.7% | -60.3% | -106.4% | -417.6% | -127.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -19.5% | -19.5% | -28.7% | -53.0% | -44.9% | -15.9% | -41.2% | -45.2% | -47.4% | -152.7% | -45.1% |
| ROA | -5.9% | -5.9% | -8.8% | -16.5% | -18.4% | -7.8% | -20.9% | -30.7% | -40.9% | -133.9% | -38.7% |
| ROIC | -6.9% | -6.9% | -11.1% | -20.3% | -21.4% | -12.8% | -19.1% | -33.8% | -41.4% | -128.8% | -51.3% |
| ROCE | -8.1% | -8.1% | -11.6% | -20.5% | -20.7% | -12.7% | -21.9% | -37.2% | -46.2% | -150.2% | -44.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.06 | 2.06 | 1.73 | 1.80 | 1.62 | 0.69 | 0.86 | 0.55 | — | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.61 | 1.30 | 1.06 | 1.07 | 0.17 | 0.63 | 0.32 | -0.17 | -0.11 | -0.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.40 | 14.62 | 73.71 | 49.76 | 2.86 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -3.70 | -3.70 | -30.19 | -57.77 | -64.27 | -25.84 | -8.53 | -40.34 | -320.87 | -1001.14 | -365.38 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.56 | 3.56 | 3.95 | 4.39 | 4.32 | 5.70 | 5.00 | 5.29 | 5.73 | 6.84 | 7.53 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.56 | 3.56 | 3.95 | 4.39 | 4.32 | 5.70 | 5.00 | 5.29 | 5.73 | 6.84 | 7.53 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.29 | 2.29 | 2.72 | 3.12 | 3.24 | 4.34 | 3.80 | 4.23 | 4.37 | 5.90 | 6.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 84.44 | 91.80 | 101.29 | 93.84 | 94.76 | 108.38 | 104.72 | 109.76 | 123.65 | 146.78 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.6% | 3.1% | 1.2% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 34.9% | 19.8% | 1.7% | 0.7% | 7.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.3% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 34.9% | 19.8% | 1.7% | 0.7% | 7.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.3% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B |
Cloud infrastructure cost dependency
Based on current market data, Snap's P/S ratio of 1.26 suggests that investors are pricing the company as a legacy advertising entity rather than a high-growth AR platform, reflecting a significant compression from historical multiples as the market demands tangible evidence of sustainable, non-dilutive earnings growth.
The current valuation appears to discount the company's long-term AR ambitions, favoring a more conservative outlook on its ability to scale revenue without proportional increases in infrastructure costs. Investors should monitor whether the current P/FCF of 17.15 provides a sufficient margin of safety given the persistent volatility in operating margins and the reliance on stock-based compensation.
As reported in financial statements, Snap's ROIC has consistently languished in negative territory, reaching -1.5% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently failing to generate returns on invested capital that exceed its cost of capital, thereby eroding long-term shareholder value through persistent operational losses.
The inability to achieve positive ROIC suggests that the company's heavy R&D and infrastructure investments have yet to reach the critical mass required for self-sustaining growth. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current business model can ever achieve the compounding returns seen in more mature, self-hosted social media peers.
According to recent SEC filings, Snap's DSO has fluctuated between 70 and 91 days over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company faces significant collection delays that may be symptomatic of its reliance on large, agency-driven advertising contracts rather than a more diversified, automated self-serve ad platform.
The extended collection cycle suggests that Snap lacks the leverage to enforce tighter payment terms, potentially impacting its cash conversion efficiency. Investors should monitor whether the recent shift toward Snapchat+ subscriptions can shorten this cycle by introducing more predictable, upfront revenue streams that bypass traditional agency payment delays.
Based on the latest quarterly data, Snap maintains a current ratio of 3.53, which provides a substantial liquidity cushion, yet this metric may be misleading as it does not account for the high cash burn associated with ongoing R&D and the structural necessity of third-party cloud hosting fees.
While the current ratio appears healthy compared to historical levels, it is largely supported by cash reserves rather than operational cash flow generation. This suggests that while the company is not at immediate risk of insolvency, its liquidity position remains vulnerable to prolonged downturns in the digital advertising market.
The most commonly misapplied metric for Snap is Adjusted EBITDA, which frequently excludes significant stock-based compensation and infrastructure-related costs, thereby painting an overly optimistic picture of the company's profitability that fails to reflect the true economic cost of maintaining its platform and retaining specialized engineering talent.
Analysts should prioritize Free Cash Flow and GAAP operating margins over Adjusted EBITDA to better understand the company's actual cash-generating capability. Relying on EBITDA-based multiples risks ignoring the persistent dilution and cash-intensive nature of the business, which are critical factors for long-term valuation.
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SNAP stock.
Snap Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -17.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Snap Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -19.5%. The historical average is -49.3%.
Based on historical data, Snap Inc. is trading at a P/E of -17.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Snap Inc. has 55.0% gross margin and -9.0% operating margin.