VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
SLDP
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
SLDPSolid Power, Inc.
$2.62$569323
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. SLDP
  4. Financial Ratios

Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -5.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -22.6%. (2019–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

SLDP Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Market Cap$569323$786M$339M$258M$443M$1.5B——
Enterprise Value$-38460677$747M$323M$233M$403M$951M——
P/E Ratio →-5.14————115.76——
P/S Ratio0.0336.1416.8414.8337.57539.99——
P/B Ratio1.161.890.830.510.802.62——
P/FCF————————
P/OCF————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

SLDP EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
EV / Revenue—34.3416.0413.3934.17350.72——
EV / EBITDA————————
EV / EBIT————————
EV / FCF————————

SLDP Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Gross Margin5.0%5.0%-0.7%-59.3%18.6%-13.3%20.6%20.0%
Operating Margin-463.7%-463.7%-523.0%-520.5%-501.5%-978.8%-551.3%-406.3%
Net Profit Margin-429.5%-429.5%-479.3%-376.5%-81.1%667.1%-683.5%-404.6%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
ROE-22.6%-22.6%-21.1%-12.4%-1.7%6.4%-171.4%-71.4%
ROA-20.6%-20.6%-19.7%-11.6%-1.6%5.7%-82.0%-44.2%
ROIC-19.6%-19.6%-18.1%-13.7%-15.8%-78.7%-125.0%-79.9%
ROCE-23.2%-23.2%-22.3%-16.6%-10.0%-8.5%-73.6%-48.3%

SLDP Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Debt / Equity0.020.020.020.020.020.001.640.50
Debt / EBITDA————————
Net Debt / Equity—-0.09-0.04-0.05-0.07-0.920.35-0.33
Net Debt / EBITDA————————
Debt / FCF————————
Interest Coverage-3738.32-3738.32-2289.85-1078.81-1407.60-67.38-32.11-140.32

Net cash position: cash ($47M) exceeds total debt ($8M)

SLDP Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Current Ratio15.9215.926.2711.5315.8171.052.976.62
Quick Ratio15.9215.926.2711.5315.8171.052.976.62
Cash Ratio14.9614.965.9211.0915.5870.442.706.31
Asset Turnover—0.050.040.030.020.000.150.11
Inventory Turnover————————
Days Sales Outstanding—36.1725.2532.5656.97111.5748.0843.65

SLDP Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Dividend Yield————————
Payout Ratio————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019
Earnings Yield—————0.9%——
FCF Yield————————
Buyback Yield100.0%0.5%2.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%——
Total Shareholder Yield100.0%0.5%2.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%——
Shares Outstanding—$185M$179M$178M$174M$168M$70M$168M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeMixed
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Liquidity and commercialization timeline

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q1)

Market Pricing Reflects Speculative Potential

As reported in financial statements, SLDP trades at a price-to-book ratio of 1.15, which suggests that the market is currently valuing the company primarily on its tangible asset base rather than assigning significant premium for its proprietary sulfide-based electrolyte technology or future commercialization prospects.

The negative P/E ratio of -5.08 underscores the company's pre-revenue status and the absence of earnings to support traditional valuation metrics. Investors should monitor whether this valuation floor holds as the company approaches critical technical milestones, as any failure to convert R&D into commercial contracts may lead to further multiple compression.

Capital Efficiency Remains Deeply Negative

Based on the company's reported figures, ROIC has remained consistently negative, hovering around -4.5% to -5.5% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying value as it consumes capital to fund pilot-scale production and electrochemical research.

The persistent negative returns on capital are a structural byproduct of the company's current phase, where heavy R&D spending is not yet offset by high-margin material sales. This trend suggests that until the company achieves a transition to continuous-flow manufacturing, capital efficiency will likely remain a secondary concern to technical survival.

Working Capital Cycles Indicate Inefficiency

According to quarterly data, the company's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.01, reflecting the significant disconnect between the firm's substantial investment in specialized pilot-scale equipment and the limited revenue generated from its current collaborative research and development services.

The high variability in DSO, which has fluctuated between 27 and 146 days, suggests that revenue recognition is highly sensitive to the timing of milestone payments from automotive partners. This lack of operational rhythm complicates the assessment of working capital efficiency and highlights the company's reliance on partner-driven cash inflows.

Liquidity Buffer Faces Increasing Pressure

As indicated by recent SEC filings, the current ratio has experienced significant volatility, dropping from 23.90 in 2025Q1 to 16.11 in 2026Q1, which, while appearing high, masks the underlying reality of a rapidly depleting cash position relative to the company's ongoing operating burn.

While the high current ratio suggests a lack of immediate short-term debt obligations, the absolute cash balance of $47.3 million provides a limited runway given the quarterly operating losses. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure non-dilutive funding, as the current liquidity position may prove insufficient to bridge the gap to commercial-scale production.

Misapplied Focus on Revenue Multiples

The most commonly misapplied metric for SLDP is the price-to-sales ratio, which obscures the company's true business model by treating milestone-based R&D payments as recurring revenue rather than the project-based, non-recurring inflows that they actually represent in the current development phase.

Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate relative to technical milestone achievement, as revenue multiples fail to capture the underlying risk of the technology's commercial viability. Using P/S ratios for a pre-commercial firm like SLDP may lead to an overestimation of growth stability and an underestimation of the capital required to reach industrial-scale production.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

SLDP — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SLDP stock.

What is Solid Power, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

Solid Power, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -5.1x. The historical average is 115.8x.

What is Solid Power, Inc.'s ROE?

Solid Power, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -22.6%. The historical average is -42.0%.

Is SLDP stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Solid Power, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -5.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Solid Power, Inc.'s profit margins?

Solid Power, Inc. has 5.0% gross margin and -463.7% operating margin.