Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA 7.7x · ROE 12.5%. (2023–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $18M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.14 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.77 | 2.42 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.68 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 11.65 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 6.3% | 6.3% | 5.9% | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 3.4% | 3.4% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.5% | 12.5% | 32.7% | 33.2% |
| ROA | 3.0% | 3.0% | 5.0% | 5.3% |
| ROIC | 6.8% | 6.8% | 11.3% | 8.4% |
| ROCE | 25.8% | 25.8% | 48.2% | 24.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.42 | 1.42 | 3.80 | 2.49 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.19 | 5.19 | 4.16 | 3.43 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.34 | 3.69 | 1.90 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.89 | 4.89 | 4.04 | 2.61 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | 2.64 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.74 | 1.74 | 2.26 | 2.42 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.94 | 0.86 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.94 | 0.86 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.12 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.61 | 2.38 | 2.67 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 116.37 | 93.71 | 49.32 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $0 | $30M | $30M |
Liquidity and project concentration
As reported in recent financial statements, SKBL's 6.2% gross margin and 2.1% net margin suggest a business model operating with minimal buffer, where even minor cost overruns or project delays could rapidly erode the company's already thin profitability in the competitive Hong Kong infrastructure market.
The narrow operating margin of 4.1% indicates that the firm functions primarily as a price-taker, lacking the pricing power to pass on inflationary pressures to government clients. Investors should monitor whether management can improve these margins through better project selection or if the current structure is structurally capped by the nature of public works procurement.
Based on the latest quarterly data, SKBL's ROIC of 5.0% appears modest, reflecting the challenges of generating meaningful returns on invested capital within a project-based engineering model that requires significant upfront bonding and working capital to maintain its status as an approved municipal contractor.
The 14.7% ROE is heavily influenced by the company's high debt-to-equity ratio of 3.25, which suggests that returns are being artificially levered rather than driven by superior operational efficiency. This reliance on debt to drive equity returns warrants further investigation into the sustainability of the firm's capital structure.
According to the 2025Q2 figures, the company's DSO of 188 days highlights a significant lag in cash collection, which is typical for the sector but poses a substantial risk given the firm's limited cash reserves and reliance on government progress payments for liquidity.
The extended collection period suggests that the company is effectively financing its clients' infrastructure projects, which places immense pressure on its own cash conversion cycle. Without a reduction in DSO, the firm may continue to face liquidity constraints that limit its ability to bid on new, potentially more profitable contracts.
As indicated by the reported figures, the debt-to-equity ratio of 3.25 and a debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 7.92 suggest that SKBL's leverage is becoming increasingly difficult to manage, especially given the firm's limited interest coverage ratio of 2.29 in the most recent quarter.
The high debt-to-EBITDA ratio implies that the company would require nearly eight years of current earnings to retire its debt, assuming no further operational volatility. This level of leverage appears precarious for a firm with such thin margins and a volatile, project-based revenue stream.
The market's reliance on the 0.77 P/B ratio as a valuation anchor for SKBL is likely misleading, as it fails to account for the illiquid nature of the company's assets and the high probability that book value is inflated by unbilled receivables and retention money.
Investors should instead focus on the company's ability to generate free cash flow, as the P/B ratio obscures the reality that the firm's primary assets are its government licenses rather than tangible property or equipment. A more appropriate metric would be an adjusted EV/EBITDA that accounts for the firm's significant working capital requirements and debt obligations.
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SKBL stock.
Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 7.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 12.5%. The historical average is 26.1%.
Based on historical data, Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited has 6.3% gross margin and 3.4% operating margin.
Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.