Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -61.1%. (2005–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1352 | $14M | $6M | $12M | $28M | $16M | $17M | $40M | $69M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $29M | $43M | $22M | $26M | $15M | $-13080076 | $-16060049 | $10M | $48M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 21.18 | 5.20 | 8.14 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.00 | 1.41 | 11.50 | 5.62 | 9.21 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.90 | 2.05 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.37 | 0.61 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.54 | 1.09 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.02 | 4.89 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.82 | 4.01 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.40 | 40.34 | 11.79 | 5.03 | -0.55 | -0.51 | 0.24 | 1.44 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | -14.51 | 1.04 | 6.05 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | -9.55 | 1.12 | 4.91 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -4.78 | 1.28 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.0% | 9.0% | 22.9% | -73.7% | -140.2% | 25.8% | 28.7% | 33.7% | 32.0% | 31.5% | 31.7% |
| Operating Margin | -174.1% | -174.1% | -1590.9% | -283.5% | -708.6% | -14.7% | 1.0% | 21.1% | 22.2% | 20.9% | 19.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -229.0% | -229.0% | -2427.6% | -1125.1% | -1040.7% | -28.0% | 2.6% | 17.3% | 25.2% | 23.1% | 22.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -61.1% | -61.1% | -38.1% | -62.5% | -56.2% | -9.5% | 1.1% | 11.1% | 14.9% | 16.8% | 17.2% |
| ROA | -30.4% | -30.4% | -21.0% | -39.3% | -44.8% | -8.1% | 1.0% | 10.0% | 13.5% | 14.9% | 15.4% |
| ROIC | -21.6% | -21.6% | -13.2% | -11.7% | -46.0% | -6.8% | 0.6% | 16.1% | 15.1% | 14.7% | 12.0% |
| ROCE | -31.6% | -31.6% | -20.3% | -15.2% | -37.5% | -4.9% | 0.4% | 13.6% | 13.1% | 15.2% | 15.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.18 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.80 | 0.43 | 0.40 | -0.28 | -0.44 | -0.45 | -0.40 | -0.32 | -0.38 | -0.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | -29.74 | -2.93 | -2.55 | -2.35 | -0.37 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -9.80 | -3.61 | — | -1.51 | -1.05 |
| Interest Coverage | -7.49 | -7.49 | -5.37 | -4.92 | — | -364.70 | 140.14 | 157.75 | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.76 | 0.76 | 3.41 | 2.06 | 3.33 | 5.25 | 5.82 | 5.89 | 8.89 | 5.43 | 4.77 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 3.38 | 2.06 | 3.24 | 5.09 | 5.60 | 5.65 | 8.42 | 4.73 | 3.37 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 1.10 | 2.85 | 3.37 | 3.30 | 4.63 | 3.38 | 1.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.62 | 0.63 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.62 | 5.62 | 1.31 | — | 5.48 | 9.76 | 10.04 | 12.31 | 9.74 | 5.23 | 2.68 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 45.25 | 22.93 | 304.08 | 340.52 | 169.65 | 115.41 | 131.93 | 163.15 | 85.50 | 130.93 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.7% | 19.2% | 12.3% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.9% | 20.5% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4432 | $1552 | $788 | $367 | $253 | $208 | $196 | $191 | $195 | $195 |
Acute liquidity and solvency
As reported in recent financial statements, Shineco's gross margin has frequently fluctuated near or below 10%, indicating that the company lacks the pricing power necessary to offset the high costs associated with its specialized botanical supply chain and labor-intensive processing requirements in the competitive Chinese market.
The persistent operating margin of -174% suggests that corporate overhead and expansion costs are vastly outstripping current production efficiencies. Investors should monitor whether the company can shift its sales mix toward higher-margin health supplements, as the current reliance on commodity-like textile and logistics activities appears to be structurally unprofitable.
Based on historical data, Shineco's ROIC has remained consistently negative, with recent figures hovering around -5.4%, suggesting that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its investments in botanical processing and agricultural logistics infrastructure.
The inability to generate positive returns on invested capital implies that the company's expansion strategy is fundamentally misaligned with its cost structure. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the firm's heavy reliance on inorganic growth and acquisitions is masking a lack of organic operational efficiency.
According to reported figures, the cash conversion cycle has reached extreme levels, with DSO and DIO metrics indicating that the company struggles to collect receivables and manage inventory effectively, which significantly impairs its ability to convert operational activity into actual cash flow for the business.
The massive fluctuations in the cash conversion cycle suggest that the company's logistics and textile segments are highly sensitive to timing differences and potential collection delays. This inefficiency appears to be a primary driver of the company's persistent liquidity challenges, as capital remains trapped in slow-moving inventory and outstanding receivables.
As evidenced by the 2025Q3 current ratio of 0.72 and a cash balance of less than $400,000, Shineco faces an acute liquidity risk that may necessitate dilutive equity financing to sustain its ongoing operating losses and high fixed-cost structure over the coming fiscal periods.
The company's liquidity position appears insufficient to navigate its high-cost operating environment without immediate external capital support. Investors should monitor the firm's ability to manage its short-term obligations, as the current cash reserves provide a very thin buffer against potential operational disruptions or further margin compression.
The market may be incorrectly valuing Shineco based on top-line revenue growth, which reached 1680% YoY, while failing to recognize that this growth is likely driven by low-margin logistics pass-throughs that do not contribute to the company's long-term profitability or sustainable economic value.
Analysts should prioritize operating cash flow and gross margin stability over revenue growth, as the latter appears to be a 'hollow' narrative in this specific business model. Relying on revenue multiples for a company with negative operating margins and severe liquidity constraints likely leads to a significant overestimation of the firm's intrinsic value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SISI stock.
Shineco, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. The historical average is 11.5x.
Shineco, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -61.1%. The historical average is -4.1%.
Based on historical data, Shineco, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Shineco, Inc. has 9.0% gross margin and -174.1% operating margin.