Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -500.7%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5M | $11M | $3M | $32M | $614M | $3.2B | $5.5B | $464M | $415M | $993M | $515M |
| Enterprise Value | $4M | $10M | $3M | $34M | $612M | $3.2B | $5.5B | $464M | $409M | $995M | $515M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.10 | 10.52 | 2.09 | 12.35 | 1022.19 | 5234.81 | 9222.35 | 672.94 | 4364.34 | 88.45 | 33.82 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.77 | 3.66 | 0.67 | 3.70 | 107.70 | 184.49 | 212.30 | 89.13 | 49.36 | 182.46 | 35.80 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.63 | 2.43 | 12.89 | 1017.83 | 5216.06 | 9183.50 | 673.61 | 4307.00 | 88.66 | 33.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -19.7% | -19.7% | 34.9% | 70.2% | 55.9% | 25.9% | 20.0% | 20.0% | 41.1% | 43.4% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1053.1% | -1053.1% | -1127.4% | -508.5% | -1886.0% | -1752.5% | -1431.6% | -957.0% | -13806.3% | -98.5% | -75.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1678.1% | -1678.1% | -884.8% | -314.4% | -2003.2% | -1536.1% | -1183.3% | -696.2% | -9107.4% | -83.1% | -109.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -500.7% | -500.7% | -174.1% | -114.1% | -105.1% | -43.3% | -45.3% | -70.5% | -125.0% | -94.2% | -116.0% |
| ROA | -180.6% | -180.6% | -89.0% | -53.0% | -64.0% | -35.6% | -35.5% | -46.4% | -66.2% | -45.6% | -52.9% |
| ROIC | -253.2% | -253.2% | -145.2% | -151.0% | -190.8% | -186.1% | -152.1% | -114.9% | -181.9% | -74.2% | -50.6% |
| ROCE | -162.4% | -162.4% | -141.2% | -132.6% | -84.6% | -45.5% | -49.1% | -81.3% | -169.2% | -101.5% | -74.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.03 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.43 | — | 0.54 | 0.49 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.31 | 0.11 | 0.16 | -0.46 | -0.66 | -0.89 | 0.09 | -0.65 | 0.45 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -206.17 | -206.17 | -379.14 | -4128.50 | -707.18 | -371.36 | -3513.50 | -1198.25 | -5.98 | -5.93 | -2.27 |
Net cash position: cash ($4M) exceeds total debt ($3M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 2.41 | 1.90 | 0.89 | 5.47 | 9.58 | 1.97 | 2.95 | 0.39 | 1.47 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 2.15 | 1.60 | 0.86 | 5.36 | 9.55 | 1.92 | 2.93 | 0.24 | 0.81 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.82 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 5.20 | 8.81 | 0.86 | 2.29 | 0.07 | 0.64 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.77 | 0.58 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.62 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 1.48 | 4.80 | 5.20 | 1.08 | 5.12 | 0.52 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 63.82 | 57.42 | 95.18 | 199.20 | 61.44 | 1165.66 | 985.34 | 5175.32 | 40.31 | 38.83 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.2% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.6% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.6% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $744781 | $425211 | $317323 | $247102 | $174461 | $15559 | $3839 | $993 | $515 |
Imminent liquidity and dilution
Based on current market data, SINT trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 5.23, a valuation that appears disconnected from the company's -18.3% revenue contraction and the absence of positive earnings, suggesting investors are pricing in speculative optionality rather than fundamental performance metrics or established commercial viability.
The lack of P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples confirms that the market views the equity as a distressed asset rather than a functioning business. This valuation level warrants caution, as it implies a growth trajectory that the company's historical financial performance and current manufacturing utilization rates fail to support.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's gross margin plummeted to -3.2% in 2026Q1, illustrating that the cost of goods sold consistently exceeds revenue and highlighting a fundamental inability to achieve the economies of scale necessary for a sustainable manufacturing business model in the medical sector.
The extreme operating margin of -1053% indicates that SG&A and R&D expenses are vastly disproportionate to current output, suggesting a zombie cost structure. Investors should monitor whether the pivot to industrial applications can improve throughput, though current figures suggest margins remain deeply entrenched in negative territory.
According to quarterly data, SINT's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -114.5% in 2026Q1, which demonstrates that the company is systematically destroying invested capital rather than compounding it, a trend that has persisted throughout the last ten quarters of reported financial performance.
The consistent decay in returns on invested capital suggests that the firm's specialized ceramic manufacturing assets are not generating sufficient economic value to justify their maintenance. This trend appears structural, as the company has failed to convert its intellectual property into a self-sustaining return profile.
Based on the provided figures, the cash conversion cycle has expanded to 210 days in 2026Q1, reflecting significant inefficiencies in inventory management and a lack of leverage over customers, which further exacerbates the company's already precarious liquidity position and reliance on external capital infusions.
The high days inventory outstanding, which reached 255 days in 2026Q1, suggests that specialized ceramic components are sitting idle, potentially indicating obsolescence risks. This inefficiency in working capital management appears to be a primary driver of the company's persistent cash burn and inability to optimize its operational cycle.
As reported in recent filings, the debt-to-equity ratio has surged to 3.49 in 2026Q1, a significant increase from 0.43 in 2024Q1, which indicates that the company is increasingly reliant on debt to sustain operations as its equity base is systematically eroded by persistent net losses.
The rising leverage, combined with the lack of positive EBITDA, suggests that debt service is becoming increasingly difficult, potentially limiting the company's ability to secure non-dilutive financing. Investors should monitor the interest coverage ratio, which remains deeply negative, signaling a high risk of future refinancing difficulties.
The price-to-sales ratio is frequently misapplied to SINT, as it obscures the company's negative gross margins and high fixed-cost structure, which render revenue growth—or lack thereof—a poor proxy for the underlying economic health or the potential for future profitability in this specific business model.
Instead of P/S, analysts should focus on the cash burn rate relative to the remaining liquidity runway, as this is the most material metric for a company in a turnaround phase. Relying on revenue multiples ignores the reality that each additional dollar of sales may currently be contributing to further losses.
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SINT stock.
Sintx Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Sintx Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -500.7%. The historical average is -144.2%.
Based on historical data, Sintx Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. has -19.7% gross margin and -1053.1% operating margin.