VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
SGHT
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
SGHTSight Sciences, Inc.
$5.48$298M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. SGHT
  4. Financial Ratios

Sight Sciences, Inc. (SGHT) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -7.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -50.7%. (2018–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

SGHT Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Market Cap$298M$414M$182M$251M$584M$835M———
Enterprise Value$247M$362M$102M$148M$434M$608M———
P/E Ratio →-7.41————————
P/S Ratio3.855.352.283.108.1917.05———
P/B Ratio4.476.472.092.093.653.60———
P/FCF—————————
P/OCF—————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

SGHT EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
EV / Revenue—4.681.281.836.0912.42———
EV / EBITDA—————————
EV / EBIT—————————
EV / FCF—————————

SGHT Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Gross Margin86.2%86.2%85.5%85.3%82.7%82.4%66.7%72.0%69.0%
Operating Margin-48.0%-48.0%-63.3%-70.7%-117.7%-105.2%-116.5%-103.0%-189.9%
Net Profit Margin-49.7%-49.7%-64.5%-68.5%-120.9%-128.6%-125.5%-110.8%-189.8%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
ROE-50.7%-50.7%-49.6%-39.6%-44.0%-87.9%———
ROA-29.8%-29.8%-33.3%-29.3%-35.0%-35.7%-67.0%-133.2%-176.6%
ROIC-274.4%-274.4%-302.9%-311.8%-803.0%-686.3%——-1129.9%
ROCE-32.0%-32.0%-35.9%-32.8%-36.3%-31.2%-74.1%-168.1%-275.0%

SGHT Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Debt / Equity0.640.640.460.290.220.15———
Debt / EBITDA—————————
Net Debt / Equity—-0.80-0.91-0.85-0.94-0.98———
Net Debt / EBITDA—————————
Debt / FCF—————————
Interest Coverage-7.21-7.21-10.00-9.25-18.30-13.38-13.41-12.19—

Net cash position: cash ($92M) exceeds total debt ($41M)

SGHT Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Current Ratio10.2210.229.0413.2911.7720.527.583.822.47
Quick Ratio9.529.528.6312.6511.4320.267.303.512.31
Cash Ratio8.348.347.7811.2710.3819.306.602.891.46
Asset Turnover—0.670.560.490.330.170.380.760.93
Inventory Turnover1.381.381.831.512.022.483.542.924.81
Days Sales Outstanding—45.9849.2964.3477.5164.9370.8264.0087.98

SGHT Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Dividend Yield—————————
Payout Ratio—————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Earnings Yield—————————
FCF Yield—————————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%———
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%———
Shares Outstanding—$52M$50M$49M$48M$48M$47M$34M$32M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeContracting
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetAdequate
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Medicare reimbursement policy volatility

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q1)

Market Pricing Reflects Growth Uncertainty

According to current market data, SGHT trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 4.00, which appears to discount the company's historical growth trajectory in favor of a more cautious outlook regarding the sustainability of its surgical glaucoma revenue stream amidst ongoing reimbursement and competitive pressures.

The absence of a positive P/E or EV/EBITDA multiple highlights the market's focus on the company's path to profitability rather than current earnings. Investors appear to be pricing in a significant risk premium, suggesting that the current valuation may be sensitive to any positive clinical or reimbursement catalysts that could restore the growth narrative.

Capital Efficiency Remains Deeply Negative

Based on reported financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -21.7% in 2025Q4, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value as it continues to deploy capital into a high-cost sales infrastructure that has yet to generate a positive return.

The persistent negative ROIC suggests that the company's investments in market expansion and clinical trials are not yet yielding the necessary procedural volume to cover the associated fixed costs. This trend warrants close monitoring, as a sustained inability to improve capital efficiency may necessitate further external financing or a strategic pivot in commercial operations.

Working Capital Cycles Indicate Inefficiency

As reported in recent filings, the company's cash conversion cycle remains elevated, with days inventory outstanding reaching 244 days in 2026Q1, suggesting that the firm is struggling to optimize its supply chain and inventory management relative to its current sales velocity.

The high DIO relative to peers indicates that a significant amount of capital is tied up in unsold inventory, which may be a byproduct of aggressive stocking strategies or slower-than-expected pull-through. Improving the efficiency of this cycle is critical for reducing the cash burn rate and enhancing the company's overall liquidity position.

Liquidity Buffer Supports Operational Runway

Based on the most recent quarterly data, the company maintains a current ratio of 5.86, which provides an adequate liquidity cushion to navigate the current period of negative cash flow, although the steady depletion of cash reserves remains a primary concern for long-term solvency.

While the high current ratio suggests the company is not facing an immediate liquidity crisis, the rapid decline in cash balances over the last ten quarters indicates that the current burn rate is unsustainable without a significant improvement in operating margins. Investors should monitor the cash runway closely as the company continues to fund its commercialization efforts.

Misapplication of Revenue Multiples

The price-to-sales ratio is frequently misapplied to SGHT, as it obscures the distinction between initial stocking orders and actual surgical pull-through, potentially leading investors to overestimate the underlying demand for the OMNI system in a volatile reimbursement environment.

Analysts should instead focus on procedural volume growth and revenue per trained surgeon to better gauge the true health of the business model. Relying solely on top-line revenue figures may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's competitive position and its ability to achieve long-term profitability.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

SGHT — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SGHT stock.

What is Sight Sciences, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

Sight Sciences, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -7.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is Sight Sciences, Inc.'s ROE?

Sight Sciences, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -50.7%. The historical average is -54.4%.

Is SGHT stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Sight Sciences, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -7.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Sight Sciences, Inc.'s profit margins?

Sight Sciences, Inc. has 86.2% gross margin and -48.0% operating margin.