Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -20.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -52.0%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $389M | $6M | $8M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $387M | $-14501565 | $-34729787 | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -20.42 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 250.21 | 0.52 | 0.85 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 11.63 | 0.13 | 0.14 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -1.19 | -3.51 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 37.0% | 31.5% | 42.2% | 48.0% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | -233.9% | -233.9% | -61.5% | -9.9% | -12.8% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -227.6% | -227.6% | -59.0% | -7.4% | -7.2% | 0.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -52.0% | -52.0% | -20.3% | — | — | 4.7% |
| ROA | -48.6% | -48.6% | -16.9% | -20.7% | -25.3% | 0.3% |
| ROIC | -100.0% | -100.0% | -65.3% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -53.4% | -53.4% | -21.1% | — | — | -139.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.43 | -0.74 | — | — | -1.51 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -0.98 | -19.99 | -11.45 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($21M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 24.65 | 24.65 | 10.90 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 1.06 |
| Quick Ratio | 24.65 | 24.65 | 10.90 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 1.06 |
| Cash Ratio | 10.31 | 10.31 | 7.88 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.24 | 0.16 | 2.42 | 3.43 | 3.50 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 999999.00 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 618.27 | 608.14 | 71.33 | 90.52 | 92.60 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $8M | $8M | $10M | $10M | $10M |
Unsustainable operating expense structure
Based on reported figures, ROMA trades at a P/S ratio of 205.14, which appears significantly detached from the firm's negative profitability and suggests that market participants may be pricing in speculative growth potential rather than the current reality of the company's consulting-based revenue model.
The extreme P/S multiple indicates that investors are assigning a premium to the firm's ESG-focused narrative, despite the lack of a positive P/E or EV/EBITDA metric. This valuation level warrants caution, as it implies an expectation of rapid, high-margin scaling that the current -233.93% operating margin does not yet support.
As reported in financial statements, ROMA's ROIC has consistently trended in negative territory, reaching -30.5% in 2026Q2, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its aggressive expansion and acquisition-heavy capital allocation strategy.
The persistent decay in ROIC suggests that the capital deployed into the business is failing to generate returns above the cost of equity. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward operational efficiency, as the current trend implies that growth is being purchased at the expense of long-term capital sustainability.
According to historical data, ROMA's asset turnover has plummeted from 1.93 in 2022Q4 to 0.05 in 2026Q2, reflecting a significant decline in the firm's ability to generate revenue from its asset base as it shifts toward a more capital-intensive, acquisition-driven consulting model.
The dramatic increase in DSO, which reached 834 days in 2026Q2, suggests severe friction in the company's cash collection process. This inefficiency implies that the firm may be struggling to convert its project-based consulting mandates into actual cash, which further exacerbates the underlying liquidity pressure.
Based on the 2026Q2 balance sheet, ROMA maintains a current ratio of 42.33, which appears exceptionally high, yet this liquidity buffer is largely a function of recent capital raises rather than efficient working capital management or consistent cash flow from core consulting operations.
While the high current ratio provides a temporary safety net, it does not reflect the underlying operational health of the business. Investors should be wary of the potential for this liquidity to be rapidly depleted if the current burn rate continues without a significant improvement in project-based revenue margins.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for ROMA is the Price-to-Sales multiple, which obscures the firm's labor-intensive cost structure and the high probability that its ESG consulting services may face commoditization as automated reporting software becomes more prevalent in the Hong Kong market.
Using P/S to value a professional services firm like ROMA ignores the critical importance of operating margins and billable utilization rates. A more appropriate metric would be an adjusted EV/EBITDA or a focus on free cash flow yield, which would better capture the firm's true earning power and operational sustainability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ROMA stock.
Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares's current P/E ratio is -20.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares's return on equity (ROE) is -52.0%. The historical average is -22.5%.
Based on historical data, Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares is trading at a P/E of -20.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares has 37.0% gross margin and -233.9% operating margin.