Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.5x · EV/EBITDA 14.6x · ROE 4.3%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $639M | $262M | $420M | $772M | $743M | $1.0B | $857M | $734M | $1.5B | $824M | $607M |
| Enterprise Value | $780M | $404M | $392M | $534M | $584M | $921M | $524M | $535M | $1.4B | $894M | $727M |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.46 | 15.27 | 18.39 | 13.47 | 9.59 | 12.92 | 12.90 | 4.34 | 15.57 | 19.52 | 16.28 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.91 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 1.72 | 1.45 | 1.03 | 3.69 | 3.03 | 2.27 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.83 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 1.82 | 2.01 | 3.01 | 1.58 | 1.39 | 3.44 | 2.84 | 2.46 |
| P/FCF | 8.86 | 3.63 | 7.30 | 7.33 | 7.42 | 14.81 | 11.14 | 3.72 | 6.57 | 6.59 | 6.21 |
| P/OCF | 8.43 | 3.46 | 6.84 | 7.07 | 7.33 | 14.57 | 11.06 | 3.70 | 6.55 | 6.54 | 6.14 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 1.52 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 3.49 | 3.29 | 2.73 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.63 | 7.57 | 7.89 | 4.65 | 6.53 | 12.60 | 7.51 | 0.75 | 3.73 | 3.41 | 2.78 |
| EV / EBIT | 18.68 | 8.11 | 6.01 | 3.57 | 6.44 | 11.86 | 7.25 | 2.60 | 5.49 | 6.18 | 4.85 |
| EV / FCF | — | 5.60 | 6.82 | 5.07 | 5.83 | 13.03 | 6.81 | 2.71 | 6.20 | 7.15 | 7.44 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 76.9% | 76.9% | 32.1% | 31.8% | 31.7% | 39.1% | 38.8% | 34.2% | 73.1% | 63.3% | 65.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 6.0% | 5.0% | 11.8% | 10.6% | 11.9% | 11.7% | 27.7% | 62.2% | 49.9% | 55.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 5.9% | 4.1% | 5.9% | 4.9% | 23.7% | 23.7% | 15.6% | 14.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.3% | 4.3% | 5.5% | 14.4% | 9.5% | 8.0% | 5.4% | 35.1% | 26.5% | 15.8% | 16.2% |
| ROA | 2.5% | 2.5% | 3.6% | 10.2% | 6.5% | 6.0% | 4.2% | 28.8% | 21.6% | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| ROIC | 6.7% | 6.7% | 11.7% | 43.0% | 30.6% | 25.2% | 19.2% | 43.6% | 53.2% | 28.0% | 40.3% |
| ROCE | 7.2% | 7.2% | 8.6% | 25.0% | 20.8% | 14.1% | 11.7% | 37.8% | 60.5% | 40.2% | 48.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.62 | 0.76 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.83 | 3.83 | 2.30 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.22 | 0.46 | 0.68 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.35 | -0.07 | -0.56 | -0.43 | -0.36 | -0.62 | -0.38 | -0.19 | 0.24 | 0.49 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.66 | 2.66 | -0.55 | -2.07 | -1.78 | -1.72 | -4.78 | -0.28 | -0.22 | 0.27 | 0.46 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.97 | -0.47 | -2.26 | -1.59 | -1.78 | -4.33 | -1.01 | -0.37 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Interest Coverage | 14.63 | 14.63 | 83.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.64 | 1.64 | 2.20 | 3.66 | 2.78 | 3.14 | 5.58 | 4.74 | 10.46 | 5.33 | 4.64 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.64 | 1.64 | 2.20 | 3.66 | 2.78 | 3.14 | 5.58 | 4.74 | 10.46 | 5.33 | 4.64 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.53 | 0.53 | 1.06 | 2.54 | 1.73 | 1.97 | 4.52 | 3.66 | 9.07 | 4.11 | 3.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.97 | 1.28 | 1.65 | 1.53 | 1.22 | 0.85 | 1.07 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.79 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 9.1% | 11.6% | 6.8% | 3.4% | 3.5% | 13.4% | 2.9% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 2.0% | 2.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 172.5% | 172.5% | 122.9% | 46.5% | 75.7% | 391.6% | 86.1% | 13.4% | 16.8% | 38.0% | 46.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.1% | 6.5% | 5.4% | 7.4% | 10.4% | 7.7% | 7.8% | 23.0% | 6.4% | 5.1% | 6.1% |
| FCF Yield | 11.3% | 27.5% | 13.7% | 13.6% | 13.5% | 6.8% | 9.0% | 26.9% | 15.2% | 15.2% | 16.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 9.2% | 11.9% | 7.0% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 13.4% | 3.0% | 3.2% | 1.1% | 2.0% | 2.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $17M | $17M | $31M | $31M | $31M | $31M | $16M | $16M | $16M | $16M |
Captive REIT fee erosion
Based on reported figures, RMR trades at a forward P/E of 30.50, which appears elevated relative to its historical averages and suggests that the market may be pricing in a recovery that remains unsupported by the current contraction in the firm's core fee-earning asset base.
The current valuation premium, particularly when contrasted with the 9.23 P/FCF multiple, indicates a significant disconnect between earnings-based multiples and cash-generating reality. Investors should monitor whether this forward-looking pricing is justified by the Carroll platform acquisition or if it represents an overestimation of the firm's ability to pivot away from its struggling captive REITs.
According to recent financial statements, RMR's ROIC has trended downward to 1.0% in 2026Q2, a sharp decline from the 3.6% levels observed in 2024, signaling that the firm is struggling to generate meaningful returns on its increasingly asset-heavy balance sheet and recent strategic investments.
The compression in ROIC suggests that the capital deployed into the Carroll platform and other initiatives has yet to yield the expected operational synergies. This decay in efficiency warrants further investigation into whether the firm's management platform is becoming structurally less profitable as it attempts to diversify its revenue streams.
As reported in financial statements, RMR's asset turnover has deteriorated to 0.21 in 2026Q2, down from 0.43 in 2024Q1, which implies that the firm is requiring significantly more capital to generate each dollar of revenue compared to its historical performance in the captive management model.
The decline in asset turnover, coupled with the lack of consistent data for DIO and CCC, suggests that the firm's operational efficiency is being hampered by the integration of new business lines. Analysts should interpret this as a potential sign of rising complexity costs that may continue to weigh on operating margins.
Based on RMR's reported figures, the debt-to-equity ratio of 0.38 in 2026Q2 remains conservative by industry standards, yet the interest coverage ratio of 2.01 suggests that even modest debt levels are becoming more burdensome as the firm's operating income faces persistent downward pressure.
While the balance sheet remains technically healthy, the narrowing interest coverage indicates that the firm's margin for error is shrinking. Investors should monitor whether the current debt levels remain sustainable if the fee-earning base continues to contract, as the firm's ability to service debt is increasingly tied to volatile incentive fee realizations.
The most commonly misapplied metric for RMR is the P/E ratio, which obscures the firm's true earning power by failing to account for the high volatility of reimbursable expenses and the back-weighted nature of incentive fees inherent in its captive REIT management business model.
Using P/E as a primary valuation tool is misleading because it treats non-recurring fee spikes and accounting noise as sustainable earnings. A more appropriate approach would be to focus on normalized FCF or an EV/AUM metric that strips out the impact of reimbursable expenses and focuses on the underlying stability of base management fees.
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RMR stock.
The RMR Group Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 19.5x. The historical average is 13.8x. This places it at the 90th percentile of its historical range.
The RMR Group Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 14.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.7x.
The RMR Group Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.3%. The historical average is 9.3%.
Based on historical data, The RMR Group Inc. is trading at a P/E of 19.5x. This is at the 90th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The RMR Group Inc.'s current dividend yield is 9.10% with a payout ratio of 172.5%.
The RMR Group Inc. has 76.9% gross margin and 6.0% operating margin.
The RMR Group Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.