Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 27.1x · EV/EBITDA 12.8x · ROE 7.9%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $444M | $296M | $278M | $333M | $376M | $355M | $201M | $314M | $198M | $269M | $145M |
| Enterprise Value | $505M | $357M | $311M | $370M | $471M | $414M | $234M | $345M | $238M | $304M | $172M |
| P/E Ratio → | 27.11 | 17.37 | 35.56 | 16.00 | 8.43 | 15.40 | 18.71 | 19.19 | 19.55 | 89.67 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.49 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.19 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.05 | 1.31 | 1.33 | 1.62 | 1.93 | 2.20 | 1.45 | 2.46 | 1.48 | 2.18 | 1.22 |
| P/FCF | 54.57 | 36.38 | 32.08 | 3.69 | 21.62 | 132.96 | 8.13 | 9.46 | — | 27.12 | 8.19 |
| P/OCF | 33.50 | 22.33 | 16.10 | 3.40 | 15.13 | 25.17 | 6.72 | 7.88 | 41.58 | 18.11 | 6.78 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.46 | 0.27 | 0.39 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.22 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.80 | 9.04 | 11.35 | 7.28 | 6.08 | 9.66 | 6.88 | 8.64 | 8.63 | 13.29 | 14.69 |
| EV / EBIT | 23.97 | 19.20 | 35.14 | 12.00 | 7.66 | 12.89 | 12.73 | 14.67 | 19.53 | 27.32 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 43.78 | 35.90 | 4.09 | 27.02 | 155.14 | 9.48 | 10.41 | — | 30.62 | 9.69 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | 17.5% | 19.7% | 16.7% | 14.8% | 16.6% | 15.7% | 17.4% | 15.3% | 16.5% | 14.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 2.6% | 4.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 2.8% | 1.6% | 1.3% | -0.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.0% | 1.9% | 3.0% | 2.6% | 1.2% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 0.6% | -0.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.9% | 7.9% | 3.7% | 10.3% | 25.0% | 15.4% | 7.9% | 12.5% | 7.9% | 4.0% | -3.5% |
| ROA | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.0% | 4.6% | 10.2% | 6.9% | 3.7% | 5.7% | 3.4% | 1.8% | -1.2% |
| ROIC | 6.0% | 6.0% | 2.9% | 8.0% | 17.3% | 10.0% | 8.0% | 11.2% | 6.0% | 5.2% | -0.2% |
| ROCE | 7.4% | 7.4% | 3.6% | 9.8% | 21.7% | 12.0% | 9.3% | 13.8% | 7.1% | 6.1% | -0.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.61 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.26 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.11 | 2.11 | 2.12 | 1.36 | 1.53 | 1.70 | 2.01 | 0.92 | 1.70 | 1.77 | 2.68 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.48 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.22 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.53 | 1.53 | 1.21 | 0.72 | 1.22 | 1.38 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 1.45 | 1.52 | 2.27 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.40 | 3.82 | 0.41 | 5.40 | 22.18 | 1.36 | 0.94 | — | 3.49 | 1.50 |
| Interest Coverage | 13.84 | 13.84 | 8.38 | 9.42 | 19.10 | 12.60 | 6.38 | 7.77 | 3.92 | 4.41 | -0.09 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.49 | 1.37 | 1.54 | 1.35 | 1.50 | 1.27 | 1.32 | 1.18 | 1.17 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.49 | 1.37 | 1.54 | 1.35 | 1.50 | 1.27 | 1.32 | 1.18 | 1.17 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.12 | 2.16 | 2.76 | 2.93 | 2.40 | 2.85 | 3.33 | 2.76 | 2.69 | 2.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 58.23 | 58.57 | 44.69 | 61.94 | 65.87 | 37.62 | 45.66 | 60.52 | 54.72 | 47.42 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.7% | 5.8% | 2.8% | 6.3% | 11.9% | 6.5% | 5.3% | 5.2% | 5.1% | 1.1% | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.8% | 2.7% | 3.1% | 27.1% | 4.6% | 0.8% | 12.3% | 10.6% | — | 3.7% | 12.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 1.5% | 3.3% | 3.0% | 0.5% | 1.2% | 6.7% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 1.5% | 3.3% | 3.0% | 0.5% | 1.2% | 7.1% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 1.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $49M | $49M | $50M | $51M | $51M | $51M | $51M | $51M | $50M | $48M |
Margin Compression and Cyclicality
Based on current market data, RLGT trades at a forward P/E of 32.14, which appears elevated relative to its historical performance and suggests that investors are pricing in significant future earnings growth that may not be fully supported by the company's recent, highly volatile profitability trends.
The current valuation premium, particularly the PEG ratio of 2.48, indicates that the market may be overestimating the company's ability to scale earnings in a fragmented freight environment. Investors should monitor whether this valuation is sustainable given the thin operating margins and the cyclical nature of the underlying logistics business.
As reported in recent financial statements, RLGT's ROIC has struggled to gain traction, hovering at a meager 0.7% in 2026Q3, which suggests that the company's aggressive acquisition-led growth strategy is currently failing to generate meaningful returns on the capital deployed into its agent-based logistics network.
The persistent gap between invested capital and returns indicates that the company may be overpaying for acquisitions or failing to integrate these assets effectively. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the buy-and-build model is creating long-term shareholder value or merely expanding the company's footprint without improving its fundamental earning power.
According to the provided quarterly data, RLGT's DSO has remained relatively stable around 59 days, yet the lack of consistent cash conversion cycle data suggests that the company's ability to manage its working capital is highly sensitive to the timing of payments from its mid-market shipper base.
The reliance on third-party carriers necessitates tight control over receivables to avoid liquidity crunches during freight downturns. The current efficiency metrics suggest that while the company is not facing an immediate crisis, its operational leverage is limited by the need to balance carrier payables against potentially slow-paying customers.
Investors frequently misapply the P/S ratio to RLGT, which obscures the company's true economic take by including pass-through transportation costs, thereby masking the fact that net revenue—or gross profit—is the only metric that accurately reflects the company's actual value-add within the logistics supply chain.
Using P/S as a primary valuation tool for this business model is fundamentally flawed because it ignores the high variable cost structure inherent in brokerage. Analysts should instead focus on net revenue margins and EV/EBITDA to better understand the company's operational profitability and its ability to retain value after carrier expenses.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RLGT stock.
Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 27.1x. The historical average is 32.8x. This places it at the 65th percentile of its historical range.
Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 12.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.8x.
Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.9%. The historical average is 1.6%.
Based on historical data, Radiant Logistics, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 27.1x. This is at the 65th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Radiant Logistics, Inc. has 17.5% gross margin and 2.3% operating margin.
Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.