Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.6x · EV/EBITDA 16.8x · ROE 101.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $69M | $60M | $55M | $51M | $47M | $337M | $294M | $694M | $778M | $476M | $604M |
| Enterprise Value | $384M | $375M | $444M | $592M | $722M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $743M | $758M | $424M | $577M |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.63 | 0.51 | 0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | 89.41 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.82 | 0.44 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.28 | 0.34 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.96 | — | — | 19.74 | 2.34 | 2.14 | 1.55 | 0.94 | 1.16 |
| P/FCF | 5.52 | 4.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.16 | 25.27 |
| P/OCF | 5.00 | 4.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 334.17 | 7.93 | 10.98 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.79 | 2.19 | 2.54 | 2.62 | 2.77 | 1.78 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.25 | 0.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.78 | 16.39 | 17.87 | 35.92 | — | — | — | 18.92 | 17.44 | 7.89 | 7.74 |
| EV / EBIT | 19.27 | 17.23 | 3.85 | 58.41 | — | — | — | — | 2516.81 | 29.24 | 21.02 |
| EV / FCF | — | 30.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.19 | 24.15 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 38.3% | 37.7% | 32.8% | 23.8% | 18.8% | 30.2% | 45.6% | 44.7% | 40.6% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 9.5% | 10.3% | 3.8% | -10.5% | -23.0% | -11.4% | 0.6% | 0.0% | -0.1% | 1.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 58.8% | 58.8% | 44.9% | -3.2% | -31.1% | -27.5% | -25.6% | -1.3% | 0.7% | -1.0% | -0.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 101.9% | 101.9% | 908.0% | — | — | -158.8% | -76.2% | -3.4% | 1.7% | -3.1% | -2.0% |
| ROA | 20.2% | 20.2% | 16.0% | -1.1% | -9.7% | -8.8% | -15.2% | -1.8% | 0.9% | -1.6% | -1.0% |
| ROIC | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | 1.1% | -3.0% | -7.7% | -8.2% | 1.1% | 0.0% | -0.2% | 2.6% |
| ROCE | 3.9% | 3.9% | 4.6% | 1.6% | -4.1% | -8.9% | -8.1% | 1.0% | 0.0% | -0.1% | 2.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.89 | 1.89 | 7.03 | — | — | 48.16 | 8.15 | 0.37 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 15.31 | 15.31 | 16.08 | 33.38 | — | — | — | 3.03 | 2.07 | 2.24 | 1.61 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.70 | 6.85 | — | — | 47.03 | 7.17 | 0.15 | -0.04 | -0.10 | -0.05 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 13.78 | 13.78 | 15.67 | 32.81 | — | — | — | 1.24 | -0.47 | -0.96 | -0.36 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 25.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.98 | -1.13 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.08 | 1.08 | 4.54 | 0.46 | -2.44 | -7.25 | -22.51 | -3.64 | 0.03 | 1.67 | 2.95 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.96 | 1.64 | 1.87 | 2.08 | 1.83 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.69 | 1.04 | 1.36 | 1.39 | 1.15 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.75 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.30 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 1.57 | 1.42 | 1.67 | 1.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | 46.33 | 46.33 | 154.57 | 93.27 | 67.66 | 16.20 | 7.46 | 7.52 | 8.46 | 8.23 | 7.81 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 16.45 | 16.96 | 17.03 | 19.22 | 23.29 | 16.91 | 10.29 | 15.76 | 4.25 | 5.03 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 100.0% | 195.8% | 166.7% | — | — | — | — | — | 1.1% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 18.1% | 20.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.5% | 4.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9.6% | 22.0% | 3.2% | 0.8% | 16.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9.6% | 22.0% | 3.2% | 0.8% | 16.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M |
Franchisee labor supply constraints
Based on current market data, RGS trades at a P/S of 0.32 and a P/FCF of 5.47, suggesting that investors are heavily discounting the company's future earnings potential due to the ongoing, volatile transition from a capital-intensive operator to an asset-light franchise model.
The low valuation multiples appear to reflect a market skepticism regarding the sustainability of the royalty stream post-restructuring. While these ratios might imply a value opportunity, they likely account for the significant execution risk inherent in managing a shrinking, legacy-heavy franchise base.
According to recent quarterly filings, the company's ROIC has struggled to gain traction, hovering at a meager 0.7% in 2026Q3, which indicates that the firm has yet to demonstrate the compounding returns on invested capital typically expected from a mature, asset-light franchise business model.
The persistent inability to generate meaningful returns on capital suggests that the structural costs of supporting the franchise network may be offsetting the benefits of the asset-light transition. Investors should monitor whether future capital allocation focuses on debt reduction or if it remains trapped in legacy operational inefficiencies.
As reported in financial statements, the company's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated wildly, reaching -28 days in 2026Q3, a figure that appears driven more by timing differences in payables and receivables than by genuine improvements in the underlying efficiency of the franchise-based revenue collection process.
The extreme volatility in the CCC, including a massive spike in DIO and DPO during 2025Q4, suggests that the company's working capital management is highly sensitive to non-recurring accounting events. This lack of consistency makes it difficult to gauge the true operational leverage of the current business structure.
Based on the company's reported figures, the debt-to-EBITDA ratio remains elevated at 47.12 as of 2026Q3, indicating that despite recent refinancing efforts, the firm's ability to service its obligations remains highly sensitive to even minor fluctuations in operational cash flow and system-wide sales performance.
The interest coverage ratio, which has hovered near 1.14, suggests that the company operates with a very thin margin of safety regarding its debt service. This leverage profile warrants close investigation, as any further contraction in royalty revenue could quickly compromise the firm's liquidity position.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to RGS, as the company's reported net income is heavily distorted by non-recurring gains from debt restructuring, rendering the metric useless for assessing the core, sustainable earning power of the underlying franchise-based service model.
Analysts should instead prioritize Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow to strip away the noise created by the company's transition and balance sheet cleanup. Relying on P/E in this context risks misinterpreting accounting-driven windfalls as evidence of operational success.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RGS stock.
Regis Corporation's current P/E ratio is 0.6x. The historical average is 26.4x. This places it at the 11th percentile of its historical range.
Regis Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 16.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.4x.
Regis Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 101.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 0.4%.
Based on historical data, Regis Corporation is trading at a P/E of 0.6x. This is at the 11th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Regis Corporation has 38.3% gross margin and 9.5% operating margin.
Regis Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 15.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.