Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -8.6x · EV/EBITDA 8.9x · ROE -16.9%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.9B | $5.2B | $3.4B | $2.8B | $2.5B | $3.9B | $2.7B | $1.5B | $2.5B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $7.4B | $7.7B | $4.8B | $3.6B | $3.6B | $4.4B | $3.3B | $2.5B | $3.5B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -8.60 | — | 37.79 | 13.25 | 8.66 | 15.97 | 73.31 | 41.14 | 6.23 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.66 | 0.53 | 0.29 | 0.52 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.66 | 1.79 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 1.72 | 1.35 | 0.92 | 1.64 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | 9.44 | 8.31 | 36.58 | 15.33 | 15.43 | — | 6.61 | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 7.74 | 6.33 | 16.13 | 12.27 | 11.01 | 63.92 | 5.45 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.04 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.51 | 0.72 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.87 | 9.26 | 7.19 | 5.58 | 5.08 | 6.73 | 8.39 | 7.48 | 6.18 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 11.57 | 12.07 | 15.82 | 9.51 | 7.58 | 10.88 | 20.31 | 18.06 | 27.87 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 13.12 | 10.74 | 53.40 | 17.27 | 19.14 | — | 9.07 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 27.8% | 28.1% | 27.2% | 27.7% | 27.1% | 25.9% | 25.6% | 29.5% | 29.1% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 8.6% | 7.7% | 8.8% | 9.6% | 9.6% | 6.1% | 5.2% | 10.2% | 9.8% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -7.1% | -7.1% | 1.7% | 3.4% | 4.4% | 4.1% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 8.4% | -8.7% | 4.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -16.9% | -16.9% | 3.8% | 8.0% | 11.8% | 11.4% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 19.6% | -14.4% | 6.2% |
| ROA | -6.3% | -6.3% | 1.6% | 3.2% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 8.6% | -9.0% | 4.1% |
| ROIC | 9.5% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 11.4% | 14.3% | 15.6% | 8.8% | 7.5% | 14.7% | 12.4% | 13.1% |
| ROCE | 9.8% | 9.8% | 9.0% | 11.0% | 13.3% | 13.3% | 8.1% | 7.3% | 14.5% | 13.6% | 15.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.78 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.79 | 3.79 | 3.06 | 2.24 | 2.06 | 1.95 | 2.93 | 3.49 | 2.15 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.86 | 0.41 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 0.66 | 0.61 | -0.02 | -0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.02 | 1.26 | 1.60 | 0.75 | 1.62 | 3.13 | 1.67 | -0.11 | -0.08 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 3.69 | 2.42 | 16.82 | 1.93 | 3.71 | — | 2.46 | — | -0.59 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.68 | 4.68 | 3.73 | 5.82 | 8.74 | 8.51 | 2.60 | 2.03 | 6.20 | — | 165.00 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.91 | 1.91 | 1.77 | 1.80 | 1.62 | 1.70 | 1.45 | 1.19 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 1.18 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 1.21 | 1.01 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.21 | 0.52 | 0.34 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.01 | 1.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.99 | 3.99 | 3.93 | 4.83 | 4.72 | 5.76 | 5.59 | 5.53 | 5.42 | 6.89 | 7.10 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 52.41 | 55.23 | 56.90 | 57.41 | 54.69 | 62.12 | 59.78 | 62.08 | 64.78 | 60.63 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 10.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 2.6% | 7.5% | 11.6% | 6.3% | 1.4% | 2.4% | 16.1% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 10.6% | 12.0% | 2.7% | 6.5% | 6.5% | — | 15.1% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.3% | 1.2% | 0.4% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $149M | $149M | $148M | $149M | $148M | $126M | $123M | $123M | $123M | $123M |
Legacy environmental liability drag
Based on reported figures, Resideo trades at a forward P/E of 11.09, which appears to discount the company relative to broader industrial peers like Johnson Controls, likely reflecting investor caution regarding the persistent drag of legacy environmental liabilities and the volatility of the residential housing cycle.
The current valuation multiple suggests the market is pricing in a significant risk premium for the company's complex legacy obligations and the cyclical nature of its Products & Solutions segment. Investors should monitor whether the forward P/E expansion indicates an expectation of margin recovery or merely a reflection of depressed earnings estimates following recent non-recurring charges.
According to historical financial data, Resideo's ROIC has remained consistently low, hovering between 1.7% and 3.1% over the last ten quarters, which suggests that the company is struggling to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital despite aggressive expansion into the smart home integrator market.
The persistent gap between the company's ROIC and its cost of capital warrants further investigation into whether recent acquisitions like Snap One are diluting overall capital efficiency. The inability to drive ROIC higher suggests that the integration of these assets has yet to yield the expected synergies required to improve long-term compounding.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, Resideo's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated between 62 and 74 days, indicating that the company's ability to manage inventory and receivables remains tethered to the high-volume, transactional nature of the ADI distribution business model rather than operational efficiency gains.
The stability of the CCC suggests that management has limited levers to accelerate cash generation within the distribution segment, as inventory levels are largely dictated by contractor demand and supply chain lead times. Investors should monitor whether the recent divestiture of the Genesis Cable business provides any meaningful relief to these working capital requirements.
Based on the provided balance sheet data, Resideo's debt-to-EBITDA ratio has trended upward to 19.21 as of 2026Q1, a significant increase from 8.32 in 2023Q4, which suggests that the company's capacity to service debt is becoming increasingly constrained by its current earnings profile and acquisition-related financing.
The rising leverage profile appears to limit the company's ability to navigate cyclical downturns without further straining its balance sheet. The interest coverage ratio, which has declined from 7.73 to 2.81 over the same period, warrants close monitoring as it indicates a narrowing margin of safety for debt service obligations.
The most commonly misapplied metric for Resideo is standard EBITDA, which fails to account for the significant cash outflows associated with the Honeywell Reimbursement Agreement, thereby masking the true free cash flow generation capacity of the business and potentially misleading investors regarding the company's actual liquidity position.
Because the indemnity payments are often treated as non-operating or excluded from adjusted EBITDA, the headline figures may appear more robust than the actual cash available for reinvestment or debt reduction. Analysts should instead focus on free cash flow after all legacy obligations to better understand the underlying economic reality of the business.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying REZI stock.
Resideo Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -8.6x. The historical average is 28.0x.
Resideo Technologies, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.0x.
Resideo Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -16.9%. The historical average is 3.4%.
Based on historical data, Resideo Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -8.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Resideo Technologies, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.72%.
Resideo Technologies, Inc. has 27.8% gross margin and 8.6% operating margin.
Resideo Technologies, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.