Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 73.9x · EV/EBITDA 38.1x · ROE 14.0%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $949M | $820M | $511M | $282M | $325M | $532M | $310M | $199M | $69M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $908M | $779M | $477M | $253M | $294M | $500M | $301M | $190M | $59M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 73.89 | 62.58 | 72.40 | 20.80 | 526.77 | 811.66 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 10.51 | 9.09 | 6.80 | 4.69 | 6.09 | 12.08 | 8.96 | 6.58 | 4.24 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 9.59 | 8.12 | 5.90 | 3.28 | 4.57 | 7.66 | 7.15 | 4.73 | 1.91 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 32.96 | 28.48 | 21.49 | 47.64 | 89.46 | 143.62 | 48.67 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 32.32 | 27.94 | 21.34 | 18.73 | 26.07 | 59.45 | 47.52 | 120.96 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.63 | 6.34 | 4.20 | 5.52 | 11.35 | 8.71 | 6.29 | 3.63 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.13 | 32.73 | 27.28 | 23.29 | 41.82 | 122.34 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 69.11 | 59.31 | 60.21 | 100.96 | 815.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.07 | 20.04 | 42.67 | 81.05 | 134.89 | 47.35 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 83.7% | 83.7% | 81.4% | 78.3% | 77.1% | 74.6% | 67.4% | 59.5% | 47.0% | 17.6% | 6.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 14.6% | 10.5% | 4.2% | 0.7% | -3.0% | -19.8% | -37.0% | -46.0% | -250.6% | -280.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.6% | 14.6% | 9.3% | 22.5% | 1.2% | 1.5% | -19.7% | -36.6% | -42.1% | -250.6% | -367.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.0% | 14.0% | 8.1% | 17.2% | 0.9% | 1.2% | -16.0% | -28.3% | -25.4% | -130.5% | -124.3% |
| ROA | 12.5% | 12.5% | 7.3% | 15.9% | 0.8% | 1.0% | -13.5% | -25.0% | -21.1% | -98.1% | -106.6% |
| ROIC | 17.6% | 17.6% | 10.9% | 3.9% | 0.7% | -2.7% | -15.0% | -28.2% | -25.5% | -98.7% | -71.6% |
| ROCE | 13.7% | 13.7% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 0.5% | -2.2% | -14.9% | -27.7% | -27.7% | -130.5% | -94.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.07 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.47 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.40 | -0.40 | -0.34 | -0.43 | -0.47 | -0.19 | -0.21 | -0.27 | -0.00 | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.71 | -1.71 | -1.97 | -2.71 | -4.34 | -7.92 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.42 | -1.45 | -4.97 | -8.41 | -8.73 | -1.31 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($44M) exceeds total debt ($3M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 7.18 | 7.18 | 4.48 | 8.26 | 7.01 | 11.16 | 3.32 | 3.71 | 3.70 | 0.31 | 0.49 |
| Quick Ratio | 7.18 | 7.18 | 4.48 | 8.26 | 7.01 | 11.16 | 3.32 | 3.71 | 3.70 | 0.31 | 0.49 |
| Cash Ratio | 5.53 | 5.53 | 3.54 | 6.57 | 5.85 | 9.91 | 2.57 | 2.72 | 2.80 | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.25 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 43.26 | 39.13 | 43.26 | 37.89 | 30.98 | 33.78 | 42.70 | 50.71 | 70.21 | 55.25 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 31.8% | 31.8% | 59.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.4% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 4.8% | 0.2% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.0% | 3.5% | 4.7% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 2.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.5% | 0.6% | 2.0% | 1.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $13M | $12M | $11M | $10M | $10M | $10M |
Regulatory and compliance exposure
Based on reported financial statements, RDVT trades at a forward P/E of 40.66, which suggests that investors are pricing in significant future earnings expansion relative to the company's current TTM P/E of 66.24, reflecting high expectations for the scalability of the CORE platform's identity intelligence services.
The current valuation multiples appear to incorporate a growth premium that assumes the company will successfully transition from a niche data provider to a broader enterprise utility. Investors should monitor whether the forward earnings trajectory justifies these multiples, as any deceleration in subscription growth could lead to a significant compression in the P/S ratio of 9.42.
According to recent quarterly filings, RDVT's ROIC has trended upward to 6.6% in 2026Q1 from a low of -1.2% in 2023Q4, indicating that the company is beginning to generate more meaningful returns on its invested capital as the business achieves greater operating leverage within its cloud-native architecture.
The improvement in ROIC suggests that the company's asset-light model is finally reaching a critical mass where incremental revenue requires minimal additional capital investment. While these returns remain modest compared to mature software peers, the upward trend validates the management team's focus on high-margin, scalable data fusion products.
As evidenced by quarterly data, RDVT's DSO has fluctuated between 36 and 43 days over the last ten quarters, suggesting that while the company maintains relatively consistent collection cycles, the timing of enterprise contract renewals continues to introduce periodic volatility into the firm's overall working capital efficiency.
The lack of a clear downward trend in DSO implies that the company has limited leverage to accelerate cash collections from its enterprise client base. Analysts should interpret this as a sign that the business remains sensitive to the payment cycles of its larger investigative and financial services customers.
Based on the company's reported figures, RDVT maintains a current ratio of 11.22 as of 2026Q1, which provides an exceptionally strong liquidity buffer that far exceeds typical industry standards and protects the firm against potential regulatory-driven disruptions or sudden shifts in the broader economic environment.
This high liquidity position appears to be a deliberate strategic choice, allowing the company to navigate potential legal or compliance-related costs without needing external financing. Such a conservative balance sheet structure suggests that the firm is well-positioned to weather periods of market stress while maintaining its core data operations.
As highlighted in recent industry context, the market frequently misapplies standard data broker valuation multiples to RDVT, failing to account for the proprietary CORE platform's compute efficiency, which differentiates the company from legacy resellers and warrants a higher valuation than traditional, lower-margin data aggregation businesses.
Investors often overlook the fact that RDVT is a software-driven compute play rather than a simple data reseller, leading to an undervaluation of its long-term margin potential. Relying on traditional P/S or EV/EBITDA multiples without adjusting for the company's unique technical moat likely obscures the true value of its scalable identity graph architecture.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RDVT stock.
Red Violet, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 73.9x. The historical average is 51.9x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Red Violet, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 38.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 31.3x.
Red Violet, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 14.0%. The historical average is -38.5%.
Based on historical data, Red Violet, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 73.9x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Red Violet, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.43% with a payout ratio of 31.8%.
Red Violet, Inc. has 83.7% gross margin and 14.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Red Violet, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.