Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -123.6%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21M | $48M | $145M | $115M | $114M | $208M |
| Enterprise Value | $13M | $40M | $142M | $99M | $112M | $207M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.79 | — | — | — | — | 56.71 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.15 | 2.63 | 6.27 | 20.24 | 240.50 | 23506.43 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.48 | 3.56 | 5.41 | 11.03 | 33.60 | 241.56 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.20 | 6.10 | 17.41 | 236.23 | 23461.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 69.3% | 60.7% | 33.2% | -50.7% | -1313.3% |
| Operating Margin | -175.6% | -175.6% | -240.1% | -692.0% | -1493.5% | -25856.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -136.8% | -136.8% | -248.7% | -937.9% | -1468.6% | -25856.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -123.6% | -123.6% | -309.4% | -770.9% | -327.5% | -265.7% |
| ROA | -37.0% | -37.0% | -115.2% | -362.0% | -266.8% | -225.0% |
| ROIC | -167.1% | -167.1% | -481.5% | — | -581.3% | — |
| ROCE | -58.0% | -58.0% | -127.3% | -317.7% | -323.2% | -265.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.51 | 0.51 | 1.21 | 0.03 | 0.09 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.58 | -0.14 | -1.54 | -0.60 | -0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -6.09 | -6.09 | -24.05 | -299.53 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($15M) exceeds total debt ($7M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.03 | 2.03 | 5.43 | 5.29 | 3.83 | 2.77 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.03 | 2.03 | 5.12 | 4.93 | 3.83 | 2.77 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 4.21 | 4.11 | 3.40 | 2.56 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 3.43 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 37.73 | 74.72 | 13.15 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 1.8% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $46M | $32M | $22M | $11M | $22M |
Liquidity and solvency pressure
According to current market data, PSQH trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 1.06, which appears to struggle to find a valuation floor given the company's negative earnings and the significant contraction in revenue growth observed over the most recent fiscal periods reported in regulatory filings.
The current P/S multiple suggests that investors are pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a high-growth technology platform. This valuation warrants caution, as it fails to account for the high probability of future equity dilution required to sustain operations given the lack of positive free cash flow.
Based on reported financial statements, PSQH's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -77.2% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its investments in the marketplace and EveryLife CPG segments.
The persistent decay in return on invested capital suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy is not generating sufficient returns to cover the cost of capital. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward operational efficiency, as the current trend indicates a structural inability to generate profitable growth.
As indicated by quarterly data, PSQH's asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant at approximately 0.14, reflecting a significant inefficiency in utilizing the company's asset base to generate revenue compared to broader software and e-commerce industry benchmarks.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, which has swung between extreme positive and negative values, suggests that the company lacks a disciplined approach to managing inventory and supplier relationships. This volatility implies that the business model is currently struggling to balance the demands of physical goods logistics with its digital marketplace operations.
According to the latest balance sheet, PSQH's current ratio of 1.69 as of 2026Q1 masks a deteriorating cash position, as the company's liquid assets are being rapidly consumed by ongoing operating losses and the high costs associated with scaling its EveryLife brand.
The company's liquidity position appears increasingly vulnerable, as the rapid depletion of cash reserves leaves little room for operational errors or macro-economic shocks. Without a clear path to positive cash flow, the company may face significant refinancing risks or the necessity of further dilutive capital raises.
Based on an analysis of the company's business model, the most commonly misapplied metric is the P/S ratio, which erroneously treats PSQH as a pure-play software entity while ignoring the capital-intensive, low-margin nature of its EveryLife CPG segment.
Investors should instead focus on gross margin contribution by segment and operating cash flow, as the software-only valuation multiples obscure the reality that the company is essentially a CPG holding company with a high-burn customer acquisition funnel. Relying on tech-sector multiples likely leads to an overestimation of the company's long-term margin potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PSQH stock.
PSQ Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.8x. The historical average is 56.7x.
PSQ Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -123.6%. The historical average is -256.6%.
Based on historical data, PSQ Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
PSQ Holdings, Inc. has 69.3% gross margin and -175.6% operating margin.