Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 7.0x · EV/EBITDA 7.9x · ROE 93.5%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $801M | $1.3B | $685M | $47M | $69M | $69M | $75M | $170M | $172M | $103M | $82M |
| Enterprise Value | $909M | $1.4B | $776M | $199M | $269M | $258M | $200M | $287M | $281M | $195M | $204M |
| P/E Ratio → | 7.03 | 11.57 | 9.88 | 1.78 | 6.12 | — | — | 20.79 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.11 | 1.82 | 1.44 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.49 | 7.38 | 10.49 | — | — | — | 12.38 | 5.97 | — | 3.21 | 2.02 |
| P/FCF | 56.62 | 93.21 | 11.84 | 0.72 | — | — | — | 11.75 | — | — | 2.89 |
| P/OCF | 33.20 | 54.66 | 10.98 | 0.67 | — | — | — | 9.37 | — | — | 2.54 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.97 | 1.63 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.60 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.89 | 12.39 | 8.93 | 3.98 | 8.61 | — | — | 11.03 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 8.28 | 13.00 | 9.50 | 4.48 | 10.95 | — | — | 17.36 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 100.86 | 13.41 | 3.03 | — | — | — | 19.82 | — | — | 7.17 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 25.4% | 25.4% | 29.5% | 23.1% | 18.4% | 9.0% | 14.0% | 18.3% | 11.8% | 12.2% | 8.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 15.2% | 17.2% | 9.6% | 5.1% | -9.1% | -5.2% | 3.2% | -7.4% | -4.3% | -7.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 15.8% | 15.8% | 14.6% | 5.7% | 2.3% | -10.6% | -5.5% | 1.5% | -11.0% | -11.4% | -14.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 93.5% | 93.5% | 225.9% | — | — | — | -132.9% | 166.3% | -805.1% | -130.7% | -64.6% |
| ROA | 29.5% | 29.5% | 22.6% | 8.7% | 3.6% | -16.6% | -7.7% | 2.7% | -20.4% | -18.6% | -15.2% |
| ROIC | 37.2% | 37.2% | 40.3% | 20.9% | 11.6% | -22.4% | -11.8% | 10.9% | -25.7% | -9.5% | -9.2% |
| ROCE | 48.5% | 48.5% | 119.5% | 241.6% | 275.3% | -134.7% | -24.6% | 17.1% | -38.7% | -12.6% | -11.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.86 | 0.86 | 2.24 | — | — | — | 24.44 | 4.10 | — | 2.84 | 3.05 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.68 | 3.49 | 7.19 | — | — | 4.49 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.61 | 1.39 | — | — | — | 20.46 | 4.10 | — | 2.84 | 2.99 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.94 | 0.94 | 1.05 | 3.04 | 6.41 | — | — | 4.49 | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.65 | 1.57 | 2.31 | — | — | — | 8.07 | — | — | 4.28 |
| Interest Coverage | 16.37 | 16.37 | 7.13 | 2.59 | 1.89 | -5.69 | -3.67 | 2.10 | -6.15 | -3.35 | -2.20 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.15 | 3.15 | 1.12 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 1.23 | 0.98 | 1.35 | 1.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.77 | 1.77 | 0.71 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.84 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.63 | 1.45 | 1.61 | 1.50 | 1.52 | 1.47 | 1.74 | 1.71 | 1.69 | 1.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.23 | 4.23 | 3.57 | 4.16 | 3.26 | 2.92 | 3.32 | 4.10 | 4.14 | 4.22 | 3.09 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 57.02 | 70.10 | 66.07 | 71.33 | 55.51 | 56.29 | 73.43 | 64.34 | 70.30 | 72.54 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 14.2% | 8.6% | 10.1% | 56.1% | 16.3% | — | — | 4.8% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.8% | 1.1% | 8.4% | 139.0% | — | — | — | 8.5% | — | — | 34.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $22M | $19M | $14M | $11M |
Strategic supply chain dependency
According to current market data, PSIX trades at a TTM P/E of 7.69, which appears to discount the company's recent earnings volatility and suggests that investors remain skeptical regarding the sustainability of its current profitability levels compared to broader industrial machinery peers.
The forward P/E of 15.96 implies a significant expectation of earnings contraction or a normalization of margins from recent peaks. This valuation gap relative to historical performance suggests the market is pricing in the inherent risks of the Weichai Power relationship rather than rewarding the company for its recent revenue growth.
Based on reported figures, ROIC has fluctuated between 2.9% and 12.8% over the last ten quarters, indicating that PSIX struggles to consistently compound capital due to the lumpy nature of its integration-focused business model and reliance on third-party component availability.
The sharp decline in ROIC to 2.9% in 2026Q1 from its 2024Q2 peak of 12.8% highlights the company's sensitivity to operating margin compression. Investors should monitor whether the company can maintain returns above its cost of capital during periods of lower industrial demand.
As reported in financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has remained volatile, peaking at 146 days in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company's inventory-heavy integration model creates significant drag on cash flow compared to more streamlined industrial peers.
The high DIO of 116 days in the most recent quarter indicates that PSIX is carrying substantial engine block inventory, likely to mitigate supply chain risks from its primary partner. This inventory dependence limits the company's ability to optimize working capital and remains a primary constraint on free cash flow generation.
According to recent SEC filings, the company has successfully reduced its debt-to-equity ratio from a precarious 52.23 in 2024Q1 to a manageable 0.90 in 2026Q1, signaling a fundamental strengthening of the balance sheet that provides a necessary buffer against future operational volatility.
The improvement in interest coverage to 6.53x suggests that debt service is becoming more comfortable, though the reliance on Weichai Power for financing support remains a critical factor. The current leverage profile appears adequate, provided that the company avoids further large-scale debt-funded inventory build-ups.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to PSIX because it fails to account for the non-recurring nature of related-party transactions and the volatility of earnings driven by supply chain bottlenecks, which often distort the company's true underlying earning power.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or normalized free cash flow, as these metrics better capture the company's operational performance independent of tax anomalies and capital structure shifts. Relying on P/E alone may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's value as a bridge technology provider.
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PSIX stock.
Power Solutions International, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 7.0x. The historical average is 15.6x. This places it at the 29th percentile of its historical range.
Power Solutions International, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.8x.
Power Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 93.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 11.7%.
Based on historical data, Power Solutions International, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 7.0x. This is at the 29th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Power Solutions International, Inc. has 25.4% gross margin and 15.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Power Solutions International, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.