Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -213.5%. (2008–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $516M | $561M | $528M | $2.5B | $1.8B | $4.2B | $4.5B | $784M | $1000M | $279M | $339M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $3.2B | $2.5B | $4.7B | $4.5B | $816M | $996M | $230M | $338M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.91 | — | — | — | — | — | 152.59 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.22 | 3.51 | 3.43 | 12.41 | 14.32 | 32.00 | 57.53 | 8.63 | 12.71 | 2.98 | 3.73 |
| P/B Ratio | 93.09 | 104.87 | 1.04 | 3.55 | 3.26 | 5.28 | 13.53 | 14.28 | 8.76 | 3.24 | 4.00 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 245.81 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 232.72 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.85 | 7.43 | 16.17 | 19.17 | 35.79 | 57.03 | 8.98 | 12.66 | 2.46 | 3.73 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | 151.64 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 243.67 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | 31.7% | 24.2% | 26.3% | 38.2% | 45.1% | 41.3% | 38.0% | 31.9% | 37.1% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | -348.5% | -348.5% | -308.0% | -166.8% | -239.4% | -161.2% | -132.3% | -110.6% | -128.4% | -96.1% | -78.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -341.5% | -341.5% | -201.2% | -153.0% | -244.9% | -138.9% | 37.3% | -92.6% | -130.4% | -98.6% | -82.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -213.5% | -213.5% | -51.3% | -48.5% | -46.4% | -32.2% | 15.1% | -99.6% | -102.5% | -108.0% | -94.0% |
| ROA | -53.4% | -53.4% | -20.6% | -17.5% | -16.7% | -15.0% | 10.5% | -52.9% | -65.3% | -65.4% | -55.3% |
| ROIC | -45.8% | -45.8% | -27.6% | -19.0% | -18.6% | -20.0% | -40.9% | -76.6% | -103.2% | -111.4% | -118.4% |
| ROCE | -58.0% | -58.0% | -33.3% | -21.2% | -17.9% | -18.2% | -44.0% | -80.8% | -74.3% | -79.5% | -66.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 141.98 | 141.98 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.68 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 1.12 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 130.07 | 1.22 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 0.63 | -0.12 | 0.58 | -0.04 | -0.57 | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -2.15 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -77.52 | -77.52 | -22.08 | -21.18 | -20.39 | -20.94 | 111.12 | -31.22 | -41.33 | -30.56 | -22.00 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.89 | 6.89 | 7.48 | 7.81 | 3.24 | 15.36 | 9.24 | 1.65 | 6.47 | 4.55 | 3.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.99 | 5.99 | 6.59 | 7.21 | 3.04 | 15.01 | 8.87 | 1.38 | 5.59 | 3.52 | 2.76 |
| Cash Ratio | 5.14 | 5.14 | 5.88 | 6.64 | 2.93 | 14.56 | 8.28 | 1.00 | 5.03 | 2.82 | 2.13 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.61 | 0.46 | 0.65 | 0.66 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.22 | 2.22 | 1.99 | 2.61 | 1.57 | 2.91 | 3.26 | 4.23 | 2.99 | 2.55 | 2.98 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 80.86 | 65.23 | 66.65 | 53.44 | 67.79 | 77.90 | 61.31 | 39.90 | 52.46 | 66.07 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.7% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $300M | $288M | $254M | $225M | $204M | $175M | $153M | $135M | $106M | $89M |
Liquidity and solvency constraints
According to recent market data, PACB trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 3.20, a multiple that appears difficult to justify given the company's negative net margins and the significant erosion of its equity base reported in the most recent quarterly filings.
The current valuation suggests that investors are pricing in a high-growth recovery scenario that remains disconnected from the company's actual operational performance. When compared to peers like Illumina, the lack of a positive P/E or EV/EBITDA multiple highlights that the market is valuing the firm as a speculative asset rather than a mature, cash-generating medical device manufacturer.
Based on reported financial figures, PACB's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -4.2% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its heavy investments in sequencing technology.
The inability to generate a positive return on invested capital suggests that the high R&D and manufacturing costs associated with the Revio platform are not yet being offset by sufficient commercial scale. Investors should monitor whether these returns can turn positive as the installed base matures, though current trends suggest a structural challenge in achieving profitability.
As reported in recent quarterly statements, the company's cash conversion cycle has ballooned to 200 days, driven by high inventory days of 185, which suggests significant friction in converting hardware and reagent investments into actual cash inflows.
This extended cycle indicates that PACB is carrying excessive inventory relative to its current sales velocity, tying up precious liquidity in a business model that is already cash-constrained. The inefficiency in managing these working capital components further exacerbates the company's reliance on external financing to fund its ongoing operations.
Based on the latest balance sheet data, the debt-to-equity ratio has surged to 297.29, a dramatic increase that signals a precarious financial position and severely limits the company's ability to navigate a high-interest-rate environment without further dilutive capital raises.
The rapid accumulation of debt relative to a shrinking equity base suggests that the company is increasingly reliant on leverage to bridge its operational funding gap. This level of indebtedness warrants close scrutiny, as it may trigger restrictive covenants or necessitate unfavorable financing terms if revenue growth does not accelerate significantly.
The most commonly misapplied metric for PACB is the price-to-sales ratio, which obscures the company's critical liquidity and solvency risks by focusing on top-line growth while ignoring the massive cash burn and debt-to-equity pressures evident in the balance sheet.
Investors should instead prioritize the cash burn rate and the 'pull-through per system' metric, as these provide a more accurate picture of the company's long-term viability. Relying on P/S multiples in a capital-intensive, loss-making business model like this can lead to a dangerous underestimation of the risk of equity dilution or potential insolvency.
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PACB stock.
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.9x. The historical average is 152.6x.
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -213.5%. The historical average is -88.0%.
Based on historical data, Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. has 31.7% gross margin and -348.5% operating margin.