Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -18.6x · EV/EBITDA 13.4x · ROE -4.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $516M | $551M | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.9B | $1.4B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $900M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $2.3B | $1.6B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $985M |
| P/E Ratio → | -18.58 | — | 14.29 | 25.17 | 11.50 | 10.40 | — | 17.14 | 19.61 | 20.36 | 17.17 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.88 | 0.97 | 1.35 | 1.20 | 1.44 | 1.05 | 1.17 | 1.22 | 0.88 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 2.13 | 2.73 | 3.43 | 2.69 | 2.67 | 2.22 | 2.72 | 3.08 | 2.39 |
| P/FCF | 45.64 | 48.77 | 22.19 | 8.99 | 24.14 | 8.22 | 19.69 | 13.89 | 21.93 | 16.60 | 13.02 |
| P/OCF | 4.31 | 4.61 | 6.84 | 6.26 | 15.17 | 6.90 | 12.90 | 9.63 | 13.50 | 11.18 | 7.59 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.75 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.64 | 1.38 | 1.76 | 1.30 | 1.18 | 1.26 | 0.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.42 | 13.87 | 9.45 | 12.82 | 8.67 | 7.70 | — | 10.92 | 9.81 | 10.63 | 7.46 |
| EV / EBIT | 76.98 | 79.52 | 14.84 | 22.96 | 10.56 | 9.56 | — | 15.62 | 14.41 | 15.87 | 10.96 |
| EV / FCF | — | 97.88 | 29.55 | 10.93 | 29.27 | 9.52 | 23.96 | 17.32 | 22.01 | 17.09 | 14.25 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 56.3% | 62.9% | 63.4% | 63.0% | 61.8% | 55.4% | 57.4% | 57.5% | 56.4% | 57.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 0.9% | 7.8% | 5.2% | 15.5% | 14.5% | -8.5% | 8.3% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1.9% | -1.9% | 6.1% | 3.9% | 11.7% | 11.5% | -12.8% | 6.1% | 6.0% | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -4.9% | -4.9% | 15.7% | 10.9% | 31.2% | 28.8% | -20.5% | 13.6% | 14.6% | 16.2% | 14.8% |
| ROA | -2.1% | -2.1% | 7.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | 14.4% | -10.1% | 7.8% | 9.3% | 9.4% | 8.3% |
| ROIC | 1.0% | 1.0% | 9.1% | 6.6% | 19.5% | 18.2% | -6.5% | 10.8% | 14.3% | 13.9% | 16.2% |
| ROCE | 1.3% | 1.3% | 12.5% | 9.1% | 26.5% | 23.6% | -8.3% | 13.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | 17.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.51 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.06 | 7.06 | 2.40 | 2.33 | 1.55 | 1.27 | — | 2.55 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 0.69 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.08 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 0.43 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.23 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.96 | 6.96 | 2.35 | 2.27 | 1.52 | 1.05 | — | 2.16 | 0.04 | 0.31 | 0.64 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 49.11 | 7.35 | 1.94 | 5.13 | 1.30 | 4.28 | 3.43 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 1.23 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.03 | 2.03 | 48.23 | 13.42 | 71.75 | 175.32 | -61.07 | 75.24 | 39.68 | 27.66 | 26.27 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.18 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.77 | 1.32 | 1.62 | 1.90 | 1.75 | 1.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.41 | 1.25 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.93 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.43 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.87 | 1.09 | 1.52 | 1.55 | 1.49 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.91 | 3.91 | 3.36 | 3.61 | 2.37 | 3.70 | 2.70 | 3.14 | 2.93 | 3.73 | 3.09 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 18.02 | 18.71 | 19.26 | 16.40 | 17.35 | 23.59 | 19.09 | 22.75 | 22.70 | 20.80 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 8.1% | 7.6% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.6% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 2.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 46.5% | 68.7% | 21.3% | 21.0% | — | 36.8% | 34.8% | 27.9% | 34.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 7.0% | 4.0% | 8.7% | 9.6% | — | 5.8% | 5.1% | 4.9% | 5.8% |
| FCF Yield | 2.2% | 2.1% | 4.5% | 11.1% | 4.1% | 12.2% | 5.1% | 7.2% | 4.6% | 6.0% | 7.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 10.7% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 5.0% | 0.6% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 18.8% | 17.7% | 3.3% | 4.7% | 6.8% | 2.6% | 3.4% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $15M | $16M | $16M | $16M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M |
Operating margin volatility
According to recent market data, OXM trades at a forward P/E of 16.05, which appears to reflect a complexity discount compared to peers like Ralph Lauren, potentially failing to account for the long-term brand equity embedded within its unique experiential retail and hospitality ecosystem.
The current valuation suggests that investors are heavily discounting the company due to recent margin volatility rather than long-term earnings power. While the forward multiple is lower than many apparel peers, this may be a rational response to the uncertainty surrounding the integration of recent acquisitions and the sustainability of the restaurant-retail hybrid model.
Based on reported financial statements, OXM's ROIC has trended downward to 1.1% in 2026Q1, indicating that the company is struggling to generate adequate returns on its expanding asset base as it continues to invest heavily in its physical retail and hospitality footprint.
The decay in return on invested capital suggests that the company's recent capital allocation, particularly regarding the Johnny Was acquisition and restaurant expansion, has yet to yield the expected synergies. Investors should monitor whether this trend is a temporary byproduct of integration costs or a permanent shift in the company's ability to compound capital effectively.
As reported in recent filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 49 days in 2026Q1, which highlights the inherent difficulty in managing inventory for a business model that relies on seasonal, print-heavy apparel and perishable hospitality inputs.
The volatility in the cash conversion cycle suggests that inventory management remains a primary operational challenge, particularly given the fashion-obsolescence risk associated with the Lilly Pulitzer brand. The inability to consistently tighten the CCC indicates that the company may be carrying excess inventory to mitigate stock-out risks, which ties up liquidity and weighs on overall efficiency.
According to the latest quarterly data, the debt-to-equity ratio has climbed to 1.13, signaling that the company's reliance on external financing has intensified as it attempts to sustain its capital-intensive business model amidst a period of negative net margins and operational headwinds.
The rising leverage profile, combined with inconsistent interest coverage, suggests that the company's financial flexibility is becoming increasingly constrained. This warrants further investigation into the company's ability to service its debt obligations if the current operating margin compression persists or if macroeconomic conditions further dampen discretionary consumer spending.
As indicated by industry analysis, the consolidated operating margin is a frequently misapplied metric for OXM, as it obscures the distinct cost structures of the hospitality and apparel segments, potentially leading to an inaccurate assessment of the company's core brand profitability and long-term competitive moat.
Investors should instead focus on segment-level performance and customer acquisition costs, as the restaurant operations serve as a strategic tool for brand engagement rather than a traditional profit center. Relying solely on the consolidated margin ignores the potential for these hospitality assets to drive higher lifetime value and recurring revenue in the apparel business.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OXM stock.
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -18.6x. The historical average is 17.0x.
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.6x.
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -4.9%. The historical average is 10.7%.
Based on historical data, Oxford Industries, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -18.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 8.15%.
Oxford Industries, Inc. has 56.3% gross margin and 0.9% operating margin.
Oxford Industries, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.