Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -108.0%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17M | $45M | $78M | $270M | $113M | $917M | $637M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $85M | $112M | $288M | $454M | $684M | $1.8B | $774M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.37 | — | — | — | — | 128.00 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.60 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.54 | 1.18 | 1.64 | 2.66 | 0.93 | 3.56 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 0.26 | 0.69 | 5.06 | 1.03 | 0.37 | — | 4.19 | — |
| P/OCF | 0.26 | 0.67 | 3.75 | 1.03 | 0.37 | — | 4.11 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.20 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.17 | 0.86 | 0.73 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 87.45 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 78.94 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 1.71 | 18.64 | 1.74 | 2.25 | — | 5.09 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 7.4% | 7.4% | 7.9% | 5.3% | 4.6% | 10.0% | 8.2% | 6.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.9% | -5.9% | -5.0% | -7.9% | -3.2% | 1.0% | -1.3% | -3.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -8.2% | -8.2% | -6.8% | -8.9% | -3.8% | 0.3% | -2.2% | -4.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -108.0% | -108.0% | -83.2% | -104.8% | -78.3% | 11.3% | — | -158.4% |
| ROA | -19.8% | -19.8% | -17.9% | -19.5% | -13.6% | 0.8% | -7.4% | -13.5% |
| ROIC | -13.8% | -13.8% | -12.7% | -16.0% | -10.6% | 2.7% | -6.0% | -7.1% |
| ROCE | -52.1% | -52.1% | -55.6% | -90.9% | -61.9% | 11.9% | -35.1% | -101.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.46 | 2.46 | 5.30 | 2.55 | 5.48 | 3.99 | — | 10.44 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 50.65 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.76 | 4.39 | 1.80 | 4.69 | 3.33 | — | 9.74 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 42.28 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.02 | 13.57 | 0.70 | 1.88 | — | 0.91 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -4.56 | -4.56 | -2.33 | -5.21 | -2.22 | 1.42 | -1.29 | -1.83 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.17 | 1.35 | 1.16 | 1.26 | 1.19 | 1.08 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.10 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 3.67 | 2.94 | 3.46 | 4.79 | 1.53 | 4.51 | 2.79 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.61 | 5.61 | 3.95 | 4.50 | 5.67 | 1.64 | 5.70 | 2.91 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.8% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 145.9% | 19.7% | 96.7% | 269.5% | — | 23.9% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 5.6% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 5.6% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4M | $3M | $3M | $2M | $954800 | $385767 | $335417 |
Liquidity and inventory turnover
Based on reported figures, Offerpad's P/FFO multiple of 9.92x in 2026Q1 appears to reflect significant market skepticism regarding the firm's ability to achieve profitability, especially when compared to the broader real estate services sector which often commands higher premiums for more stable, fee-based revenue streams.
The current valuation suggests that investors are pricing the company as a distressed asset manager rather than a growth-oriented technology platform. The lack of a positive FFO trajectory makes traditional REIT valuation metrics difficult to apply, as the market appears to be discounting the equity value to account for the high probability of further capital dilution.
As reported in financial statements, Offerpad's NOI margin has remained trapped between 6.1% and 8.9% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the core iBuying business model struggles to generate sufficient property-level profitability to offset the high fixed costs inherent in its operational structure.
The inability to expand margins suggests that the company's renovation-heavy approach is not yet achieving the economies of scale required to overcome the thin spreads of the residential housing market. Investors should monitor whether the company can successfully pivot toward higher-margin ancillary services to improve its overall profitability profile.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's debt-to-equity ratio reached 2.46x in 2025Q4, which, when combined with persistent negative interest coverage, suggests a highly vulnerable balance sheet that may struggle to refinance existing obligations if market liquidity for residential warehouse facilities continues to tighten.
The reliance on non-recourse, asset-backed warehouse facilities creates a direct link between inventory turnover and solvency. If the company cannot maintain a rapid pace of home sales, the interest expense on these facilities may continue to erode the remaining equity base, further limiting management's ability to pursue new growth initiatives.
As indicated by the company's financial disclosures, the use of standard P/E ratios to evaluate Offerpad is fundamentally misleading because it ignores the massive non-cash depreciation charges and the capital-intensive nature of inventory-based real estate transactions that characterize the firm's current business model.
Analysts should instead focus on FFO and AFFO to better understand the company's underlying cash-generating capacity, as these metrics strip away the accounting noise of property depreciation. Relying on P/E obscures the reality that the company is currently burning cash to maintain its inventory, making it a poor proxy for true operational performance.
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OPAD stock.
Offerpad Solutions Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.4x. The historical average is 128.0x.
Offerpad Solutions Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -108.0%. The historical average is -86.9%.
Based on historical data, Offerpad Solutions Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Offerpad Solutions Inc. has 7.4% gross margin and -5.9% operating margin.