Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -11.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -51.7%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.6B | $2.2B | $179M | $81M | $67M | $229M | $191M | $316M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3.1B | $1.6B | $209M | $101M | $71M | $190M | $173M | $325M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -11.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 71.83 | 42.67 | 24.88 | 5.14 | 31.60 | 78.90 | 88.09 | 987.04 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.43 | 4.56 | 4.98 | 1.79 | 1.15 | 2.04 | 12.64 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 31.20 | 29.10 | 6.44 | 33.29 | 65.49 | 79.75 | 1015.24 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.7% | 39.7% | 4.8% | 40.7% | 52.2% | 37.7% | 42.9% | 75.3% | 79.3% | -218.8% | -125.4% |
| Operating Margin | -115.1% | -115.1% | -481.2% | -253.2% | -3266.0% | -618.3% | -532.6% | -4798.0% | -4439.1% | -1569.3% | -627.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -260.2% | -260.2% | -528.4% | -285.8% | -3445.3% | -516.9% | -622.9% | -6052.2% | -6365.8% | -1569.3% | -627.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -51.7% | -51.7% | -93.8% | -86.8% | -85.9% | -23.6% | -1015.9% | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -21.2% | -21.2% | -37.7% | -47.2% | -68.0% | -20.6% | -82.2% | -560.0% | -906.3% | -647.9% | -504.8% |
| ROIC | — | — | -39.4% | -46.9% | -77.1% | -38.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -11.1% | -11.1% | -60.0% | -60.5% | -73.8% | -27.9% | -544.9% | — | — | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 1.68 | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.02 | 0.53 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.23 | 0.84 | 0.45 | 0.06 | -0.35 | -1.20 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -8.88 | -8.88 | -9.50 | -9.79 | -18.47 | -30.17 | -5.96 | -5.62 | -3.54 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($594M) exceeds total debt ($12M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.84 | 4.84 | 0.94 | 0.66 | 1.58 | 9.66 | 2.23 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.68 | 4.68 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 1.48 | 9.40 | 2.14 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.34 | 4.34 | 0.59 | 0.42 | 1.31 | 8.83 | 2.09 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.35 | 0.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.70 | 4.26 | 0.47 | 1.54 | 1.07 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 2.23 | 8.51 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 160.85 | 278.16 | 105.17 | 361.30 | 152.34 | 8.04 | 23.03 | 143.55 | 83.23 | 120.39 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $222M | $70M | $53M | $42M | $34M | $20M | $18M | $17M | $19M | $19M |
High Operating Burn Rate
According to recent market data, ONDS trades at a P/S ratio of 76.52, which significantly exceeds typical industrial equipment peers and suggests that investors are pricing in aggressive long-term adoption of the FullMAX platform rather than current trailing financial performance or near-term profitability metrics.
The current valuation appears to be disconnected from traditional fundamental anchors, implying that the market views ONDS as a high-growth technology option rather than a standard hardware manufacturer. Investors should monitor whether this premium can be sustained as the company transitions from project-based revenue to a more predictable, recurring service model.
Based on reported figures, ONDS's ROIC of -58.9% in 2026Q1 highlights the substantial drag of heavy R&D and acquisition-related costs, indicating that the company is currently destroying capital as it attempts to scale its proprietary wireless and drone technology platforms across the rail industry.
The negative return on invested capital suggests that the company has not yet reached the necessary scale to offset its high fixed-cost base. Future improvements in this metric will likely depend on the company's ability to transition from heavy infrastructure investment to high-margin software and data-as-a-service revenue streams.
As reported in financial statements, the cash conversion cycle reached 106 days in 2026Q1, reflecting the inherent challenges of managing long-lead-time industrial hardware projects and the complexities of integrating disparate technology acquisitions into a unified operational workflow for the company's rail and drone segments.
The volatility in the cash conversion cycle, particularly the fluctuations in days inventory outstanding, suggests that ONDS is still refining its supply chain and inventory management processes. Investors should watch for a stabilization in these metrics as a sign that the company is achieving operational maturity.
Based on the company's reported figures, the current ratio of 10.91 in 2026Q1 indicates a robust short-term liquidity position, which provides a significant, albeit likely temporary, cushion to fund ongoing high-burn operations and strategic initiatives without immediate reliance on external debt markets for survival.
While the current liquidity position appears strong, it is important to distinguish between operating cash and restricted funds that may be tied to specific project milestones. The company's ability to maintain this liquidity while scaling revenue will be a critical factor in avoiding further shareholder dilution.
As indicated by the company's negative TTM P/E of -12.63, traditional earnings-based valuation is fundamentally misapplied to ONDS, as it obscures the company's current phase of aggressive investment and the potential long-term value of its proprietary wireless spectrum rights and protocol moat.
Investors should instead focus on metrics like EV/Sales or backlog growth, which better capture the company's transition toward a software-defined infrastructure provider. Relying on P/E ratios in this context risks ignoring the strategic value of the company's intellectual property and its potential for future high-margin licensing revenue.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ONDS stock.
Ondas Holdings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -11.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Ondas Holdings Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -51.7%. The historical average is -68.4%.
Based on historical data, Ondas Holdings Inc. is trading at a P/E of -11.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ondas Holdings Inc. has 39.7% gross margin and -115.1% operating margin.