Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 5.3x · EV/EBITDA 0.6x · ROE 19.4%. (2022–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $172M | $181M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $27M | $35M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 5.34 | 5.60 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.10 | 1.16 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.87 | 0.92 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 3.28 | 3.44 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 3.18 | 3.34 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.23 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.64 | 0.85 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 0.76 | 0.91 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 0.67 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 30.3% | 33.9% | 28.8% | 24.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.4% | 22.4% | 29.4% | 20.4% | 12.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 20.7% | 20.7% | 22.0% | 12.0% | 14.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.4% | 19.4% | 53.1% | 55.0% | 103.5% |
| ROA | 15.8% | 15.8% | 33.1% | 12.6% | 10.0% |
| ROIC | 43.3% | 43.3% | 114.6% | 609.8% | — |
| ROCE | 19.7% | 19.7% | 64.4% | 57.0% | 24.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.52 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.47 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.74 | -0.49 | -0.72 | -1.56 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.53 | -3.53 | -1.02 | -1.11 | -1.40 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.77 | -1.74 | -0.89 | -1.31 |
| Interest Coverage | 96.04 | 96.04 | 212.85 | 12.12 | 12.74 |
Net cash position: cash ($152M) exceeds total debt ($6M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.65 | 6.65 | 5.11 | 1.26 | 0.90 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.08 | 6.08 | 3.77 | 1.11 | 0.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 5.10 | 5.10 | 2.98 | 0.49 | 0.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.66 | 1.19 | 0.97 | 0.67 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.34 | 6.34 | 4.14 | 7.34 | 3.53 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 54.56 | 28.78 | 128.11 | 112.83 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 18.7% | 17.9% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 30.5% | 29.0% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $42M | $42M | $44M | $44M |
Regional geographic concentration risk
Based on a forward P/E of 6.08 and an EV/EBITDA of 0.54, OMSE appears significantly undervalued relative to broader energy service peers, suggesting that the market is applying a substantial discount for its concentrated exposure to Middle Eastern state-owned energy entities and regional regulatory volatility.
The extremely low EV/EBITDA multiple indicates that the market may be pricing in a terminal decline or significant geopolitical risk rather than the company's recent 108% revenue growth. Investors should monitor whether this valuation gap narrows as the company demonstrates the sustainability of its service-heavy revenue model in its core operating territories.
According to reported financial figures, OMSE maintains an operating margin of 29.4%, which significantly outpaces the peer group average and suggests that the company's specialized threading and repair services provide a structural profitability advantage over competitors focused on high-volume, commoditized tubular goods manufacturing and distribution.
This high margin profile appears to be a direct result of the company's ability to integrate high-precision maintenance services with equipment sales, effectively creating a recurring revenue stream. The ability to sustain these margins during periods of rapid scaling suggests that the company possesses meaningful operating leverage and pricing power within its niche.
As reported in recent financial statements, OMSE operates with a negligible debt-to-equity ratio of 0.05%, signaling a structural insulation from rising interest rate environments that often constrain the capital expenditure plans of smaller, more leveraged independent energy service providers operating within the same regional drilling markets.
This conservative capital structure provides the firm with significant flexibility to navigate cyclical downturns in the energy sector without the pressure of debt service obligations. The lack of leverage appears to be a deliberate strategic choice, potentially prioritizing long-term operational stability over the pursuit of aggressive, debt-funded expansion.
Based on the company's financial snapshot, OMSE maintains a substantial cash reserve of $72.95 million, which provides a significant buffer against operational shocks but may also indicate a lack of high-return reinvestment opportunities, potentially diluting overall returns on equity if the capital remains idle.
While this liquidity position is undeniably strong, the accumulation of such a large cash pile without a clear disclosure of dividend or M&A strategy warrants further investigation by analysts. Investors should monitor whether this cash is eventually deployed for geographic expansion or if it remains a drag on the company's capital efficiency.
The market likely misapplies standard OCTG valuation multiples to OMSE, failing to account for the company's specialized service-moat, which obscures the durability of its earnings compared to pure-play tubular manufacturers that are highly sensitive to global steel price cycles and commodity-linked demand volatility.
By treating OMSE as a commoditized tubular goods provider, analysts may be ignoring the value of its 'authorized threader' status and localized repair infrastructure. A more appropriate analytical framework would focus on service-based metrics, such as recurring maintenance revenue growth and customer retention rates, rather than relying solely on cyclical P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OMSE stock.
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 5.3x. The historical average is 5.6x.
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 0.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 0.9x.
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 19.4%. The historical average is 57.8%.
Based on historical data, OMS Energy Technologies Inc. is trading at a P/E of 5.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
OMS Energy Technologies Inc. has 30.3% gross margin and 22.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.