Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2023–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $516M | $256M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $413M | $153M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.48 | 0.47 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 9999.00 | 28433.53 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 17002.20 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -11.1% | -11.1% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -374444.4% | -374444.4% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | 5994444.4% | 5994444.4% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | 1015.3% | 1015.3% | -46.4% | -37.7% |
| ROIC | — | — | -5674.5% | — |
| ROCE | -65.4% | -65.4% | -370.0% | -2082.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -23.63 | -23.63 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($103M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 33.57 | 33.57 | 2.52 | 1.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 33.57 | 33.57 | 2.52 | 1.21 |
| Cash Ratio | 32.57 | 32.57 | 1.31 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 100.0% | 210.8% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $55M | $29M | $29M |
Regulatory and execution bottleneck
As reported in recent financial statements, NKLR's TTM P/E of 0.49 is fundamentally misleading, as the company remains a pre-revenue entity without an established earnings base or dividend yield to anchor its valuation against traditional utility sector benchmarks or interest rate-sensitive bond proxies.
The current P/E ratio appears to be a mathematical artifact of non-operating gains rather than a reflection of operational success. Investors should monitor the lack of forward P/E guidance, which suggests that the market is currently unable to price the company based on standard utility valuation methodologies.
Based on the 2025Q3 reported figures, NKLR generated a negative ROE of -2.7%, which highlights the absence of a constructive regulatory environment or an operational rate base capable of delivering the authorized returns typically expected from a regulated electric utility provider.
The gap between the company's current performance and the standard authorized ROE for utilities is absolute, as the firm has yet to reach commercial operations. This negative return profile warrants further investigation into how the company plans to transition from R&D-heavy spending to a regulated return-on-equity model.
According to the 2025Q4 financial statements, the company's equity position has deteriorated into negative territory, indicating that the firm's aggressive development spending is rapidly outpacing its ability to maintain a stable capital structure without constant reliance on external equity markets.
The lack of a positive equity base suggests that the company is currently operating in a highly vulnerable state. Investors should monitor the interest coverage ratio, which, at -45.79 in 2025Q4, indicates that the firm's current financial obligations are significantly disconnected from its operational cash-generating capacity.
As noted in industry analysis, the most commonly misapplied ratio for NKLR is the P/E multiple, which obscures the company's pre-revenue status and fails to account for the massive, non-recurring R&D expenditures that distort traditional earnings-based valuation models for regulated utility entities.
Applying a P/E ratio to a pre-revenue nuclear developer is fundamentally flawed because it ignores the 'regulatory burn rate' and the absence of a rate-regulated asset base. Analysts should instead focus on 'dollars per megawatt' of the future pipeline or the probability of achieving regulatory design acceptance.
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NKLR stock.
Terra Innovatum Global N.V. Ordinary shares's current P/E ratio is 0.5x. The historical average is 0.5x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Terra Innovatum Global N.V. Ordinary shares is trading at a P/E of 0.5x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Terra Innovatum Global N.V. Ordinary shares has -11.1% gross margin and -374444.4% operating margin.