Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -142.9%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7M | $40M | $248M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $53M | $86M | $258M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.06 | 0.32 | 2.91 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.11 | 0.43 | 1.04 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.68 | 3.02 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -1.2% | -1.2% | 3.5% | 8.6% | 5.7% | -1.9% | 16.6% |
| Operating Margin | -46.5% | -46.5% | -19.8% | -17.5% | -12.3% | -26.6% | -50.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -187.7% | -187.7% | -14.9% | -15.8% | -9.4% | -25.2% | -56.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -142.9% | -142.9% | -5.2% | -7.7% | -7.0% | -15.6% | -23.1% |
| ROA | -92.2% | -92.2% | -4.1% | -5.9% | -4.5% | -9.9% | -15.7% |
| ROIC | -22.7% | -22.7% | -5.0% | -6.3% | -6.5% | -12.4% | -23.1% |
| ROCE | -30.5% | -30.5% | -6.1% | -7.5% | -7.6% | -13.9% | -20.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.04 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.49 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.05 | -0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -111.37 | -111.37 | -27.01 | -26.63 | -12.14 | -14.54 | -16.29 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 1.10 | 1.02 | 1.15 | 0.87 | 0.98 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 1.10 | 1.01 | 1.13 | 0.87 | 0.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.77 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.63 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.23 | 0.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | 749.35 | 749.35 | 606.67 | 462.02 | 129.28 | 720.43 | 209.24 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 105.62 | 124.85 | 83.56 | 86.19 | 182.60 | 54.93 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1M | $1M | $934260 | $934260 | $934260 | $934260 |
Liquidity and solvency constraints
According to recent market data, NIPG trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.06, which, when compared to broader entertainment peers, suggests that investors are heavily discounting the company's future revenue potential due to the persistent lack of positive earnings and significant cash burn.
The extremely low P/S multiple indicates that the market is not pricing in a growth premium, but rather a high probability of continued financial distress. Investors should monitor whether this valuation floor holds as the company attempts to bridge its Western and Chinese operations without a clear path to profitability.
Based on reported financial figures, NIPG's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive territory, oscillating from 2.0% in 2022Q4 to -0.9% in 2023Q3, which highlights the company's inability to generate meaningful returns on the capital deployed through its aggressive acquisition-led growth strategy.
The decay in return on invested capital suggests that the assets acquired during the merger are not yet contributing to operational efficiency. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company can optimize its existing roster and talent assets to improve capital productivity.
As reported in recent filings, NIPG's cash conversion cycle fluctuated from 58 days in 2022Q4 to 14 days in 2023Q4, a shift that appears to be driven more by irregular sponsorship collection timing than by structural improvements in operational efficiency or supplier leverage.
The volatility in the cash conversion cycle suggests that the company lacks consistent control over its working capital, which is a significant risk given the tight liquidity position. Investors should monitor whether the recent compression in the cycle is sustainable or merely a temporary artifact of lumpy revenue recognition.
Based on the provided financial statements, NIPG's interest coverage ratio has shown extreme volatility, swinging from 30.04 in 2022Q4 to -24.77 in 2023Q3, which suggests that the company's ability to service its debt obligations is currently compromised by its negative operating income.
While the debt-to-equity ratio remains relatively low at 0.05, the lack of consistent operating cash flow makes even modest debt levels a potential burden. The company's reliance on external financing to cover operational shortfalls appears to be a structural vulnerability that could limit future strategic flexibility.
As indicated by the company's financial profile, the P/S ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for NIPG, as it obscures the underlying negative gross margins and the high cost of talent acquisition that currently render top-line growth value-destructive rather than value-accretive.
Investors should instead focus on the contribution margin per segment or the cash-burn-to-revenue ratio to better understand the company's true earning power. Relying on revenue multiples in this context may lead to an overestimation of the company's intrinsic value by ignoring the high fixed-cost structure inherent in esports.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NIPG stock.
NIP Group Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
NIP Group Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -142.9%. The historical average is -33.6%.
Based on historical data, NIP Group Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
NIP Group Inc. has -1.2% gross margin and -46.5% operating margin.