Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12M | $10M | $26M | $343M | $855M | $2.6B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $2.3B | $3.8B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $90M | $537M | $970M | $949M | $861M | $2.7B | $2.0B | $2.2B | $1.6B | $3.3B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13.76 | 15.55 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.67 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 1.07 | 9.21 | 79.19 | 278.69 | 1.33 | 1.81 | 3.89 | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | 1.95 | 89.99 | 117.98 | 3.33 | 5.06 | 12.15 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.54 | 12.89 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.07 | 10.91 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.29 | 4.83 | 2.96 | 9.27 | 79.31 | 317.83 | 1.41 | 1.26 | 3.44 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 39.41 | 6.03 | 67.94 | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11.43 | 6.46 | 128.69 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.24 | 11.41 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 85.9% | 85.9% | 44.1% | 27.7% | 6.6% | 11.6% | -6.2% | 54.6% | 54.7% | 53.3% | 48.9% |
| Operating Margin | -152.4% | -152.4% | -401.6% | -333.2% | -2651.0% | -759.4% | -1235.2% | -1.0% | 16.3% | -0.1% | 10.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -350.8% | -350.8% | -454.5% | -408.3% | -6073.8% | -778.6% | -1263.9% | 9.7% | 11.2% | -4.9% | 7.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | -661.3% | -2407.5% | -1184.0% | -25.0% | 27.8% | 37.3% | -13.4% | 9.3% |
| ROA | -79.7% | -79.7% | -86.4% | -101.7% | -878.1% | -212.0% | -5.4% | 5.8% | 6.7% | -2.8% | 3.8% |
| ROIC | — | — | -161.2% | -158.9% | -760.3% | -128.6% | -11.5% | -4.7% | — | -5.9% | 28.1% |
| ROCE | — | — | — | -136.6% | -514.9% | -604.8% | -32.6% | -1.2% | 21.5% | -0.1% | 9.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | 1.18 | 0.67 | 16.82 | 1.85 | 1.28 | 2.01 | 0.91 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.57 | 2.20 | 12.70 | 2.64 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | 0.01 | 0.14 | 16.57 | 0.21 | -1.54 | -1.39 | -0.66 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.33 | -2.65 | -8.81 | -1.91 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -2.30 | -1.48 | -1.37 |
| Interest Coverage | -12.05 | -12.05 | -23.39 | -34.16 | -53.31 | -231.58 | -253.74 | 5.54 | 7.34 | 0.97 | 14.67 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 1.40 | 4.84 | 1.12 | 0.04 | 0.88 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 0.93 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.32 | 1.37 | 5.52 | 0.77 | 0.04 | 0.87 | 1.09 | 1.10 | 0.92 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.65 | 2.67 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.81 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 0.84 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.47 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1035.80 | 1035.80 | 95.20 | 10.30 | — | 0.61 | — | 79.99 | 50.93 | 57.21 | 65.71 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 63.37 | 205.51 | 405.55 | 616.08 | 419.59 | 1282.92 | 1.78 | 3.66 | 4.22 | 0.50 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.3% | 6.4% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13.3% | 7.8% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.4% | 0.9% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.4% | 0.9% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $822109 | $706175 | $686555 | $669248 | $35254 | $36306 | $36213 | $31840 | $31250 |
Liquidity and solvency risk
As reported in recent financial filings, NaaS trades at a P/S ratio of 0.60, a multiple that appears to reflect significant market skepticism regarding the company's ability to reverse its -37.73% revenue decline and achieve a sustainable path toward positive earnings in the near term.
The low P/S multiple suggests that investors are pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-stage technology platform. This valuation discount is likely a direct response to the persistent net losses and the lack of a clear path to positive EBITDA, which renders traditional P/E or PEG metrics inapplicable.
Based on reported figures, NaaS has struggled with a consistently negative ROIC, which reached -11.0% in 2025Q2, indicating that the company is failing to generate adequate returns on the capital deployed to build its charging aggregator network.
The negative ROIC trend over the last ten quarters highlights a fundamental inability to achieve economies of scale. Investors should monitor whether the company can improve its capital efficiency, as the current trajectory suggests that further investment may continue to erode shareholder value rather than create it.
According to quarterly data, the company's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.05, suggesting that the platform's infrastructure is significantly underutilized relative to the capital invested in its development and maintenance over the past several years.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, which has swung wildly between negative and positive values, indicates poor control over working capital. This inefficiency suggests that NaaS lacks the bargaining power to optimize payment terms with suppliers or collect receivables effectively from its fragmented network of charging operators.
As indicated by the latest financial statements, the current ratio has plummeted to 0.35 as of 2025Q2, reflecting a precarious liquidity position where current assets are insufficient to cover short-term obligations, leaving the firm with limited flexibility to navigate ongoing operational cash requirements.
The rapid decline in the quick ratio confirms that the company is highly dependent on external financing to maintain operations. Without a significant improvement in cash generation, the company appears to face a high probability of a liquidity event or the need for dilutive capital raises.
The most commonly misapplied metric for NaaS is the gross margin, which, at 85.92%, creates a misleading impression of profitability that obscures the company's underlying inability to cover its massive fixed-cost base and high customer acquisition expenses.
Analysts should prioritize 'Cash Burn per Charging Session' over gross margin, as the latter is likely inflated by net-basis revenue recognition. Focusing on gross margin ignores the reality that the company acts as an intermediary with limited pricing power, making it vulnerable to competitive margin compression.
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NAAS stock.
NaaS Technology Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.2x. The historical average is 14.7x.
Based on historical data, NaaS Technology Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
NaaS Technology Inc. has 85.9% gross margin and -152.4% operating margin.