Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 45.7x · EV/EBITDA 5.1x · ROE 2.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.7B | $4.5B | $4.6B | $6.7B | $6.8B | $4.0B | $1.9B | $4.4B | $4.1B | $5.4B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.5B | $6.3B | $6.2B | $8.5B | $9.1B | $6.9B | $5.5B | $7.5B | $6.9B | $7.3B | $7.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 45.67 | 43.40 | 11.21 | 10.11 | 7.02 | 81.59 | — | 23.30 | 9.91 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 17.34 | 16.55 | 1.51 | 1.94 | 1.60 | 1.44 | 1.06 | 1.57 | 1.58 | 2.55 | 2.96 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1.20 | 1.32 | 0.93 | 0.42 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 1.16 | 1.09 |
| P/FCF | 11.89 | 11.35 | 5.57 | 10.33 | 6.44 | 5.49 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 3.78 | 3.61 | 2.64 | 3.82 | 3.13 | 2.83 | 2.31 | 2.97 | 5.44 | 8.73 | 8.92 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 23.27 | 2.06 | 2.45 | 2.15 | 2.45 | 3.13 | 2.67 | 2.68 | 3.48 | 4.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.11 | 4.95 | 4.23 | 4.31 | 3.84 | 6.39 | — | 4.72 | 4.64 | 5.30 | 7.94 |
| EV / EBIT | 21.70 | 23.24 | 9.22 | 8.18 | 5.66 | 25.97 | — | 16.90 | 31.43 | 29.16 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.96 | 7.57 | 13.06 | 8.62 | 9.37 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 718.5% | 718.5% | 33.2% | 76.0% | 56.4% | 45.7% | -0.5% | 31.5% | 40.9% | 32.0% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | 110.8% | 110.8% | 20.0% | 30.2% | 37.6% | 10.0% | -77.8% | 15.8% | 24.3% | 15.3% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 38.3% | 38.3% | 13.5% | 19.2% | 22.9% | -2.6% | -65.6% | 40.8% | 15.9% | -14.9% | -15.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.0% | 2.0% | 7.5% | 12.4% | 20.4% | -1.7% | -22.5% | 20.9% | 8.4% | -6.5% | -5.4% |
| ROA | 1.1% | 1.1% | 4.2% | 6.6% | 9.4% | -0.7% | -10.3% | 10.1% | 3.9% | -3.1% | -2.5% |
| ROIC | 3.2% | 3.2% | 6.3% | 10.6% | 16.3% | 2.8% | -12.1% | 3.9% | 6.5% | 3.5% | -2.2% |
| ROCE | 3.4% | 3.4% | 6.8% | 11.6% | 17.4% | 3.0% | -13.2% | 4.2% | 6.5% | 3.6% | -2.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.61 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.41 | 1.07 | 1.18 | 3.13 | — | 2.14 | 2.17 | 2.11 | 3.18 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.83 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.43 | 1.43 | 1.12 | 0.90 | 0.97 | 2.64 | — | 1.95 | 1.91 | 1.41 | 2.25 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 4.60 | 2.00 | 2.74 | 2.18 | 3.88 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.83 | 2.83 | 6.36 | 9.20 | 10.62 | 1.19 | -8.14 | 1.84 | 1.22 | 1.00 | -2.33 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 1.40 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.64 | 1.04 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.30 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 1.52 | 0.96 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 1.16 | 0.66 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| Inventory Turnover | 12.31 | 12.31 | 36.76 | 15.19 | 33.77 | 28.08 | 26.63 | 25.34 | 17.38 | 13.56 | 12.70 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 380.92 | 32.95 | 36.41 | 33.83 | 33.64 | 54.60 | 55.28 | 32.15 | 42.36 | 72.03 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.9% | 4.1% | 3.9% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 5.2% | 3.7% | 4.2% | 3.2% | 3.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 178.7% | 178.7% | 44.2% | 25.8% | 13.3% | — | — | 14.2% | 42.1% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.2% | 2.3% | 8.9% | 9.9% | 14.3% | 1.2% | — | 4.3% | 10.1% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 8.4% | 8.8% | 18.0% | 9.7% | 15.5% | 18.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.2% | 2.3% | 6.6% | 2.2% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.1% | 6.4% | 10.5% | 4.8% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 5.2% | 15.0% | 4.4% | 3.4% | 3.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $144M | $151M | $157M | $157M | $154M | $154M | $165M | $174M | $173M | $172M |
Offshore regulatory and operational volatility
According to current market data, Murphy Oil trades at a forward P/E of 8.87, which suggests that investors are pricing in significant earnings volatility compared to the broader energy sector, despite the company's relatively low P/B ratio of 0.95 indicating a potential discount to its asset base.
The divergence between the trailing P/E of 48.08 and the forward multiple implies that the market anticipates a sharp mean reversion in earnings following recent anomalous accounting periods. This valuation gap warrants caution, as it suggests that current market sentiment is heavily influenced by the expectation of non-recurring gains fading rather than sustained organic growth.
Based on reported figures, Murphy Oil's ROIC has struggled to maintain momentum, hovering near 1.6% in recent quarters, which highlights the difficulty of generating superior returns on invested capital given the high capital intensity inherent in the company's offshore-heavy infrastructure-led exploration strategy.
The persistent low ROIC suggests that the company's capital allocation is currently failing to clear the hurdle rate required for long-term value creation. Investors should monitor whether the recent focus on infrastructure-led tie-backs can eventually improve these returns by reducing the massive upfront costs associated with deepwater development.
As reported in financial statements, Murphy Oil's asset turnover ratio has remained consistently low at approximately 0.07 to 0.08, reflecting the massive, long-lived nature of its offshore property, plant, and equipment base which dominates the company's balance sheet and limits rapid capital rotation.
The lack of meaningful improvement in asset turnover underscores the structural reality that Murphy is an asset-heavy operator where revenue growth is tied to long-cycle projects rather than operational velocity. The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle further suggests that management faces ongoing challenges in optimizing working capital across diverse geographic segments.
Based on recent quarterly filings, Murphy Oil has maintained a disciplined debt-to-equity ratio between 0.37 and 0.44, which appears to be a deliberate strategy to insulate the company from the inherent cyclicality and high financing costs associated with deepwater offshore exploration projects.
This conservative capital structure provides a significant degree of financial flexibility, potentially allowing the company to navigate commodity price downturns more effectively than more levered peers. However, the low interest coverage ratios in certain periods suggest that even with moderate debt, the company's earnings volatility can create temporary pressure on debt service capacity.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to Murphy Oil because it fails to account for the significant non-cash charges and one-time divestiture gains that distort net income, making it a poor indicator of the company's underlying operational earning power and cash-generating capability.
Analysts should prioritize EV/EBITDA or P/FCF metrics to better assess the company's performance, as these ratios are less sensitive to the accounting volatility inherent in the successful efforts method. Relying on P/E in this context risks misinterpreting accounting noise as fundamental operational success or failure.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MUR stock.
Murphy Oil Corporation's current P/E ratio is 45.7x. The historical average is 17.0x. This places it at the 96th percentile of its historical range.
Murphy Oil Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 5.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.3x.
Murphy Oil Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 2.0%. The historical average is 10.1%.
Based on historical data, Murphy Oil Corporation is trading at a P/E of 45.7x. This is at the 96th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Murphy Oil Corporation's current dividend yield is 3.93% with a payout ratio of 178.7%.
Murphy Oil Corporation has 718.5% gross margin and 110.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Murphy Oil Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.