Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 70.8x · EV/EBITDA 28.4x · ROE 12.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $28.3B | $17.1B | $10.7B | $5.9B | $6.5B | $6.8B | $5.0B | $4.9B | $3.2B | $4.0B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $30.7B | $19.5B | $13.0B | $8.8B | $9.6B | $8.7B | $6.1B | $6.5B | $4.6B | $5.4B | $4.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 70.78 | 42.87 | 66.09 | — | 203.17 | 20.74 | 15.57 | 12.41 | 12.44 | 11.60 | 23.76 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.98 | 1.20 | 0.87 | 0.49 | 0.66 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.47 | 0.61 | 0.61 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.47 | 5.13 | 3.59 | 2.16 | 2.37 | 2.68 | 2.50 | 2.71 | 2.32 | 2.81 | 2.80 |
| P/FCF | 99.00 | 59.87 | 11.04 | 11.88 | 73.09 | 10.95 | 6.95 | 11.48 | 9.26 | 122.67 | 35.19 |
| P/OCF | 51.84 | 31.35 | 9.57 | 8.54 | 18.45 | 8.60 | 5.36 | 8.84 | 6.11 | 25.79 | 15.14 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.36 | 1.05 | 0.74 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.42 | 18.07 | 13.75 | 11.70 | 15.25 | 10.43 | 7.79 | 7.95 | 6.51 | 9.13 | 9.29 |
| EV / EBIT | 47.02 | 28.34 | 29.20 | 58.25 | 62.10 | 18.09 | 12.57 | 10.99 | 9.82 | 12.38 | 14.83 |
| EV / FCF | — | 68.28 | 13.33 | 17.88 | 108.44 | 14.04 | 8.42 | 15.25 | 13.20 | 163.10 | 46.34 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 9.6% | 13.2% | 6.6% | 12.2% | 14.4% | 16.6% | 12.2% | 14.0% | 13.0% | 13.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 4.6% | 3.5% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 5.2% | — | 8.0% | 7.2% | 6.0% | 5.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.8% | 2.8% | 1.3% | -0.4% | 0.3% | 4.1% | 5.1% | 5.5% | 3.8% | 5.3% | 2.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.6% | 12.6% | 5.7% | -1.8% | 1.3% | 14.4% | 17.0% | 24.6% | 18.4% | 27.3% | 12.8% |
| ROA | 4.2% | 4.2% | 1.8% | -0.5% | 0.4% | 5.3% | 6.3% | 8.3% | 6.1% | 9.6% | 4.3% |
| ROIC | 8.9% | 8.9% | 6.0% | 2.0% | 1.8% | 8.3% | — | 14.1% | 13.4% | 12.3% | 10.2% |
| ROCE | 10.2% | 10.2% | 7.0% | 2.3% | 2.1% | 9.1% | — | 16.7% | 15.8% | 14.6% | 12.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.90 | 0.74 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 0.92 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.59 | 2.59 | 2.79 | 4.63 | 5.56 | 2.72 | 1.91 | 2.05 | 1.99 | 2.33 | 2.32 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.09 | 1.15 | 0.76 | 0.53 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.89 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.23 | 2.23 | 2.37 | 3.93 | 4.97 | 2.29 | 1.37 | 1.96 | 1.95 | 2.26 | 2.24 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.41 | 2.29 | 6.00 | 35.35 | 3.09 | 1.48 | 3.77 | 3.95 | 40.43 | 11.16 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.98 | 3.98 | 2.30 | 0.65 | 1.38 | 9.05 | 8.13 | 7.63 | 5.69 | 7.09 | 5.45 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.22 | 1.40 | 1.55 | 1.61 | 1.67 | 1.78 | 1.69 | 1.92 | 1.67 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.18 | 1.36 | 1.50 | 1.56 | 1.60 | 1.70 | 1.60 | 1.84 | 1.54 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.41 | 1.37 | 1.28 | 1.05 | 1.12 | 1.21 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.62 | 1.61 |
| Inventory Turnover | 115.00 | 115.00 | 99.45 | 103.65 | 72.78 | 73.50 | 58.80 | 63.01 | 52.23 | 74.62 | 40.01 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 90.49 | 87.14 | 95.13 | 116.82 | 103.15 | 101.30 | 95.27 | 101.64 | 88.28 | 82.17 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.4% | 2.3% | 1.5% | — | 0.5% | 4.8% | 6.4% | 8.1% | 8.0% | 8.6% | 4.2% |
| FCF Yield | 1.0% | 1.7% | 9.1% | 8.4% | 1.4% | 9.1% | 14.4% | 8.7% | 10.8% | 0.8% | 2.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 2.4% | 0.1% | 9.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 2.4% | 0.1% | 9.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $79M | $79M | $78M | $76M | $74M | $74M | $76M | $80M | $82M | $81M |
Project execution and integration
According to current market data, MasTec trades at a forward P/E of 44.89, which appears to price in significant future earnings expansion that may be difficult to sustain given the historical volatility in net margins observed in recent quarterly filings.
The valuation premium relative to peers like Primoris Services suggests the market is assigning a growth-oriented multiple to MasTec's infrastructure pipeline. However, investors should monitor whether this valuation is justified by organic growth or if it relies too heavily on the successful integration of recent large-scale acquisitions.
Based on reported financial figures, MasTec's ROIC has struggled to exceed 5% in most quarters, peaking at 4.8% in 2025Q3, which indicates that the company is currently failing to generate returns on invested capital that exceed typical industry cost-of-capital thresholds.
The low ROIC trend suggests that the capital-intensive nature of the business, combined with the integration of large acquisitions, is diluting overall returns. This warrants further investigation into whether the company can improve asset utilization to drive higher returns as the current project backlog matures.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated between 29 and 66 days, reflecting the inherent difficulty in managing billing and payment cycles across diverse, large-scale infrastructure projects in the energy and communications sectors.
The variability in the cash conversion cycle suggests that MasTec's liquidity is highly sensitive to project-specific billing milestones. Investors should monitor the DSO trend, which reached 85 days in 2025Q4, as rising receivables may indicate potential delays in project completion or client payment disputes.
As indicated by the company's reported figures, the current ratio has remained within a narrow range of 1.22 to 1.40 over the last ten quarters, suggesting a relatively thin liquidity buffer that may leave the firm vulnerable to sudden shifts in project-related cash requirements.
While the current ratio appears adequate for standard operations, the reliance on project-based cash flows means that any significant disruption in billing could quickly strain the company's liquidity position. This necessitates a cautious approach to assessing the firm's ability to fund ongoing capital expenditures during periods of project delays.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to MasTec, as it obscures the impact of non-cash charges and acquisition-related amortization that significantly distort reported earnings, making it a poor metric for evaluating the company's true underlying cash-generating capability in this capital-intensive industry.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or P/FCF to better capture the operational reality of the business, as these metrics are less susceptible to the accounting nuances of the percentage-of-completion method. Relying on P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's valuation relative to its peers.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MTZ stock.
MasTec, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 70.8x. The historical average is 21.3x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
MasTec, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 28.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.1x.
MasTec, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.6%. The historical average is 6.3%.
Based on historical data, MasTec, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 70.8x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MasTec, Inc. has 9.6% gross margin and 4.6% operating margin.
MasTec, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.