Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.4x · EV/EBITDA 8.5x · ROE 5.8%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $48.1B | $34.9B | $18.3B | $24.0B | $24.0B | $35.3B | $26.1B | $17.8B | $21.1B | $33.1B | $20.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $56.0B | $42.8B | $23.5B | $27.0B | $26.3B | $39.5B | $33.7B | $27.4B | $31.2B | $43.2B | $32.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.37 | 11.09 | 13.69 | 26.05 | 2.58 | 1.72 | — | — | 4.10 | 7.24 | 11.77 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.48 | 0.37 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.81 | 0.65 |
| P/FCF | 102.05 | 74.11 | 40.93 | 7.91 | 3.56 | 5.11 | 15.89 | 7.27 | 23.69 | 18.97 | 79.22 |
| P/OCF | 10.00 | 7.26 | 3.77 | 3.14 | 2.35 | 3.56 | 6.40 | 2.95 | 5.03 | 7.25 | 7.72 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.70 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 0.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.52 | 6.52 | 3.95 | 5.65 | 2.05 | 2.02 | 6.65 | 11.21 | 3.34 | 5.27 | 4.65 |
| EV / EBIT | 15.43 | 14.47 | 6.85 | 8.60 | 2.26 | 2.37 | 14.66 | 30.57 | 5.51 | 7.34 | 8.22 |
| EV / FCF | — | 90.96 | 52.48 | 8.90 | 3.91 | 5.72 | 20.51 | 11.19 | 35.05 | 24.79 | 121.11 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 17.5% | 24.9% | 8.7% | 5.2% | 11.8% | 11.4% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | 5.9% | 5.3% | 3.4% | 12.9% | 22.2% | 4.0% | -0.9% | 8.6% | 7.9% | 7.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.1% | 5.1% | 2.1% | 1.3% | 11.7% | 19.5% | -1.4% | -3.5% | 6.8% | 6.7% | 3.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.8% | 5.8% | 2.5% | 1.6% | 17.4% | 33.0% | -1.8% | -5.8% | 12.1% | 12.5% | 5.9% |
| ROA | 3.4% | 3.4% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 10.1% | 17.3% | -0.9% | -2.7% | 5.8% | 5.7% | 2.3% |
| ROIC | 4.5% | 4.5% | 4.3% | 3.0% | 13.6% | 24.8% | 3.3% | -0.9% | 9.3% | 8.6% | 7.2% |
| ROCE | 5.1% | 5.1% | 4.7% | 3.2% | 14.8% | 27.0% | 3.3% | -0.9% | 9.9% | 9.0% | 7.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.42 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.04 | 2.04 | 1.95 | 2.23 | 0.91 | 0.43 | 2.60 | 5.88 | 1.34 | 1.58 | 1.99 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.34 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.87 | 0.63 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 1.50 | 3.93 | 1.08 | 1.24 | 1.61 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 16.85 | 11.55 | 0.99 | 0.35 | 0.61 | 4.62 | 3.92 | 11.37 | 5.82 | 41.89 |
| Interest Coverage | 9.97 | 9.97 | 6.72 | 4.39 | 29.06 | 46.57 | 4.82 | 1.29 | 8.25 | 6.70 | 3.32 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.53 | 1.66 | 1.45 | 1.23 | 1.34 | 1.38 | 1.25 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.76 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.98 | 2.98 | 3.43 | 3.33 | 3.28 | 2.90 | 3.94 | 3.87 | 3.23 | 3.38 | 3.42 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 20.68 | 33.06 | 27.78 | 28.41 | 33.77 | 28.71 | 27.15 | 26.05 | 24.81 | 22.89 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.9% | 1.2% | 2.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 13.4% | 13.4% | 29.4% | 40.2% | 3.6% | 2.1% | — | — | 4.3% | 3.1% | 3.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.5% | 9.0% | 7.3% | 3.8% | 38.8% | 58.1% | — | — | 24.4% | 13.8% | 8.5% |
| FCF Yield | 1.0% | 1.3% | 2.4% | 12.6% | 28.1% | 19.6% | 6.3% | 13.8% | 4.2% | 5.3% | 1.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.5% | 0.8% | 7.1% | 5.0% | 12.3% | 14.7% | 1.9% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.4% | 2.0% | 9.3% | 6.6% | 13.6% | 15.5% | 2.6% | 1.6% | 2.1% | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $766M | $791M | $845M | $914M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $955M |
Cyclical margin compression
Based on current market data, ArcelorMittal trades at a forward P/E of 12.77 and an EV/EBITDA of 5.75, suggesting that investors are applying a significant discount compared to US-based peers like Nucor, likely due to persistent concerns regarding European energy costs and global industrial demand volatility.
The valuation multiples appear to price in a cautious outlook for steel spreads, reflecting the market's skepticism toward the company's ability to maintain margins during the transition to green steel. This discount may be structural rather than temporary, as the market favors the more flexible, scrap-based EAF models of domestic competitors over MT's integrated blast furnace fleet.
According to recent financial statements, ArcelorMittal's ROIC has struggled to gain traction, hovering at a modest 0.9% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company's massive capital base is currently failing to generate returns that meaningfully exceed its cost of capital in the current cycle.
The low ROIC trend highlights the difficulty of compounding value in a capital-intensive, cyclical industry where maintenance capex consumes a large portion of operating cash flow. Investors should monitor whether the ongoing green steel investments will eventually drive higher returns or merely serve as a necessary, non-accretive cost of doing business.
As reported in quarterly filings, ArcelorMittal's cash conversion cycle remains highly inconsistent, with inventory days reaching 127 in 2025Q4, suggesting that the company faces significant challenges in optimizing its working capital efficiency amidst fluctuating global steel demand and raw material price swings.
The variability in DSO and DIO metrics implies that the company's operational leverage is frequently hampered by its inability to quickly adjust inventory levels to match shifting market conditions. This inefficiency likely contributes to the observed volatility in free cash flow, as capital remains tied up in inventory during periods of softening demand.
Based on the provided data, ArcelorMittal's current ratio has tightened to 1.39 in 2026Q1, reflecting a narrowing liquidity buffer that warrants monitoring as the company navigates the high capital requirements of its global blast furnace operations and the ongoing energy transition in its European segment.
While the current ratio appears adequate, the quick ratio of 0.54 suggests a heavy reliance on inventory to meet short-term obligations, which could become a liability if steel prices experience a sharp, sustained decline. The company's liquidity position appears sensitive to the timing of cash inflows, making it vulnerable to sudden disruptions in the industrial production cycle.
Investors frequently misinterpret ArcelorMittal's reported Debt/Equity ratio of 0.24 as a sign of a fortress balance sheet, failing to account for the significant off-balance-sheet liabilities, including pension obligations and environmental remediation costs, which are inherent to the company's legacy industrial footprint.
Relying solely on the D/E ratio obscures the true extent of the company's financial obligations and its long-term capital commitments. A more accurate assessment of leverage should incorporate these hidden liabilities, as they represent a structural claim on future cash flows that the standard D/E ratio fails to capture.
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MT stock.
ArcelorMittal S.A.'s current P/E ratio is 15.4x. The historical average is 11.4x. This places it at the 76th percentile of its historical range.
ArcelorMittal S.A.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.2x.
ArcelorMittal S.A.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.8%. The historical average is 11.2%.
Based on historical data, ArcelorMittal S.A. is trading at a P/E of 15.4x. This is at the 76th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ArcelorMittal S.A.'s current dividend yield is 0.87% with a payout ratio of 13.4%.
ArcelorMittal S.A. has 9.6% gross margin and 5.9% operating margin.
ArcelorMittal S.A.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.